Perceptual incongruence influences bistability and cortical activation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Brouwer, Gijs Joost ^a,d   Tong, Frank ^b   Hagoort, Peter ^c   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN REGION; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NEUROIMAGING; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUBICULUM; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 63749128220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005056     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual Competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 13-21.
2. Hol K, Koene A, Van Ee R (2003) Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Vision 3: 486-498.
3. Suzuki S, Peterson MA (2000) Multiplicative effects of intention on the perception of bistable apparent motion. Psychological Science 11: 202-209.
4. Pettigrew JD, Miller SM (1998) A sticky interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder. Proc R Soc London Ser B 265: 2141-2148.
5. Tononi G, Edelman GM (2000) Schizophrenia and the mechanisms of conscious integration. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 31: 391-400.
6. Logothetis NK, Schall JD (1989) Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245: 761-763.
7. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1996) Activity changes in early visual cortex reflects monkey' precepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379: 549-553.
8. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280: 1930-1934.
9. Lumer ED, Rees G (1999) Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1669-1673.
10. Kleinschmidt A, Bushel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RS (1998) Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 2427-2433.
11. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21: 753-759.
12. Muckli L, Kriegeskorte N, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE, Singer W, et al. (2002) Apparent motion: event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of perceptual switches and states. J Neurosci 22: RC219 1-5.
13. Haynes JD, Rees G (2005) Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Curr Biol 15: 1301-1307.
14. Slotnick SD, Yantis S (2005) Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24: 97-108.
15. Sterzer P, Kleinschmidt A (2006) A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 323-328.
16. van Ee R, van Dam LCJ, Erkelens CJ (2002) Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. J Vis 2: 597-607.
17. van Ee R (2005) Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vis Res 45: 29-40.
18. Knapen THJ, van Ee R (2006) Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently. Vision Research 46: 3381-3492.
19. Brouwer GJ, van Ee R, Schwarzbach J (2005) Activation in visual cortex correlates with the awareness of stereoscopic depth. J Neurosci 25: 10403-10413.
20. van Ee R, Richards W (2002) A planar and a volumetric test for stereoanomaly. Perception 31: 51-64.
21. Brouwer GJ, van Ee R (2007) Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. J Neurosci 27: 1015-1023.
22. Tootell RB, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Ledden PJ, Liu AK, et al. (1997) Functional analysis of V3A and related areas in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 17: 7060-7078.
23. DeYoe EA, Carman GJ, Bandettini P, Glickman S, Wieser J, et al. (1996) Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2382-2386.
24. Tootell RB, Hadjikhani NK, Vanduffel W, Liu AK, Mendola JD, et al. (1998a) Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 811-817.
25. Malach R, Reppas JB, Benson RR, Kwong KK, Jiang H, et al. (1995) Objectrelated activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 8135-8139.
26. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Hendler T, Edelman S, Itzchak Y, et al. (1998) A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Hum Brain Mapp 6: 316-328.
27. Kurtz Z, Kanwisher N (2000) Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J Neurosci 20: 3310-3318.
28. van Dam LC, van Ee R (2005) The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vision Res 45: 2417-35.
29. Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R (2001) An efficient algorithm for topologically correct segmentation of the cortical sheet in anatomical MR volumes. NeuroImage 14: 329-346.
30. Wandell BA (2000) Computational neuroimaging of human visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 22: 145-173.
31. Slotnick SD, Yantis S (2003) Efficient acquisition of human retinotopic maps. Hum Brain Map 18: 22-29.
32. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.
33. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ (1996) Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 16: 4207-4221.
34. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline J.-P, Frith CD, et al. (1995) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Map 2: 189-210.
35. van Ee R, Adams WJ, Mamassian P (2003) Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bi-stability in stereoscopic slant perception. J Optical Society of America A 20: 1398-1406.
36. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cog Sci 3: 254-264.
37. Shikata E, Tanaka Y, Nakamura H, Taira M, Sakata H (1996) Selectivity of the parietal visual neurons in 3D orientation of surface of stereoscopic stimuli. Neuroreport 7: 2389-2394.
38. Shikata E, Hamzei F, Glauche V, Knab R, Dettmers C, et al. (2001) Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: an event-related fMRI study. J Neurophysiol 85: 1309-1314.
39. Shikata E, Hamzei F, Glauche V, Koch M, Weiler C, et al. (2003) Functional properties and interaction of the anterior and posterior intraparietal areas in humans, an event-related fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 17: 1105-1110.
40. Tsutsui K, Jiang M, Yara K, Sakata H, Taira M (2001) Integration of perspective and disparity cues in surface-orientation-selective neurons of area CIP. J Neurophysiol 86: 2865-2867.
41. Tsutsui K, Sakata H, Naganuma T, Taira M (2002) Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science 298: 409-412.
42. Taira M, Tsutsui K, Jiang M, Yara K, Sakata H (2000) Parietal neurons represent surface orientation form the gradient of binocular disparity. J Neurophysiol 83: 3140-3146.
43. Tsao DY, Vanduffel W, Sasaki Y, Fize D, Knutsen TA, et al. (2003) Stereopsis activates V3a and caudal intraparietal areas in macaques and humans. Neuron 39: 555-568.
44. Cusack L (2005) The intraparietal sulcus and perceptual organization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 641-651.
45. Tononi G, Srinivasan R, Russell DP, Edelman GM (1998) Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. PNAS 95: 3198-3203.
46. Raemaekers M, van der Schaaf ME, van Ee R, van Wezel RJA (2009) Widespread fMRI activity differences between perceptual states in rivalry are correlated with differences in observer biases. Brain Research 1252: 161-171.
47. Kamphuisen AP, Bauer M, van Ee R (2008) No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: Meg frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex. Journal of Vision 8(5): 41-8.
48. Backus BT, Fleet DJ, Parker AJ, Heeger DJ (2001) Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. J Neurophysiol 86: 2054-2068.
49. Neri P, Bridge H, Heeger DJ (2004) Stereoscopic processing of absolute and relative disparity in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 92: 1880-1891.
50. Kourtzi Z, Erb M, Grodd W, Bulthoff HH (2003) Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex 13: 911-920.
51. Hinkle DA, Connor CE (2002) Three-dimensional orientation tuning in macaque area V4. Nat Neurosci 5: 665-70.
52. Chandrasekaran C, Canon V, Dahmen CJ, Kourtzi Z, Welchman AE (2007) Neural correlates of disparity-defined shape discrimination in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 97: 1553-1565.
53. Georgieva S, Peeters R, Kolster H, Todd JT, Orban GA (2009) The processing of three-dimensional shape from disparity in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 727-742.
54. Preston TJ, Li S, Kourtzi Z, Welchman AE (2008) Multivoxel pattern selectivity for perceptually relevant binocular disparities in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 28: 11315-11327.
55. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (1999) Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for disparity-defined three-dimensional shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 8217-8222.
56. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (2000) Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron 27: 385-397.
57. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (2000) Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct area within macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 288: 2054-2056.
58. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (2001) Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for three-dimensional boundaries and surfaces. J Neurosci 21: 9419-9429.
59. Lui Y, Vogels R, Orban GA (2004) Convergence of depth from texture and depth from disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex. J Neurosci 24: 3795-3800.
60. Welchman AE, Deubelius A, Conrad V, Bulthoff HH, Kourtzi Z (2005) 3D Shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 8: 820-827.
61. Nguyenkim JD, DeAngelis GC (2003) Disparity-based coding of threedimensional surface orientation by macaque middle temporal neurons. J Neurosci 23: 7117-7128.
62. Adams WJ, Banks MS, van Ee R (2001) Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 4: 1063-1064.
63. van Ee R, Anderson BL (2001) Motion direction, speed, and orientation in binocular matching. Nature 410: 690-694.