Separation of 3′-sialyllactose and lactose by nanofiltration: A trade-off between charge repulsion and pore swelling induced by high pH

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 138, Issue , 2014, Pages 77-83

  Nordvang, Rune T ^a   Luo, Jianquan ^a   Zeuner, Birgitte ^a   Prior, Rasmus ^a   Andersen, Mads F ^a   Mikkelsen, Jørn D ^a   Meyer, Anne S ^a   Pinelo, Manuel ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

3 Sialyllactose; Electrostatic repulsion; Nanofiltration; Pore swelling; Prebiotics

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTATICS; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; SEPARATION; SUGARS; SWELLING; WATER FILTRATION;

CHARGE DIFFERENCE; CHARGE REPULSION; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; INFANT FORMULA; NEGATIVE CHARGE; PREBIOTICS; RETENTION LEVELS; WATER PERMEABILITY;

FILTRATION;

EID: 84909594375     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. L. Bode, Human milk oligosaccharides: every baby needs a sugar mama, Glycobiology 22 (2012) 1147-1162, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cws074.
2. C. Jers, M. Michalak, D.M. Larsen, K.P. Kepp, H. Li, Y. Guo, et al., Rational design of a new Trypanosoma rangeli trans-sialidase for efficient sialylation of glycans, PLoS One 9 (2014) e83902, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083902.
3. M. Michalak, D.M. Larsen, C. Jers, J.R.M. Almeida, M. Willer, H. Li, et al., Biocatalytic production of 3′-sialyllactose by use of a modified sialidase with superior trans-sialidase activity, Process Biochem. 49 (2014) 265-270, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.10.023.
4. B. Zeuner, J. Luo, C. Nyffenegger, V. Aumala, J.D. Mikkelsen, A.S. Meyer, Optimizing the biocatalytic productivity of an engineered sialidase from Trypanosoma rangeli for 3′-sialyllactose production, Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 55 (2014) 85-93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.12.009.
5. J. Holck, D.M. Larsen, M. Michalak, H. Li, L. Kjærulff, F. Kirpekar, et al., Enzyme catalysed production of sialyllated human milk oligosaccharides and galactooligosaccharides by Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase, N. Biotechnol. 31 (2014) 156-165, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.11.006.
6. A.K. Goulas, P.G. Kapasakalidis, H.R. Sinclair, R.A. Rastall, A.S. Grandison, Purification of oligosaccharides by nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 321-335, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00362-9.
7. Y.M. Feng, X.L. Chang, W.H. Wang, R.Y. Ma, Separation of galactooligosaccharides mixture by nanofiltration, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 40 (2009) 326-332, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2008.12.003.
8. J. Luo, Y. Wan, Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration - a critical review, J. Membr. Sci. 438 (2013) 18-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.029.
9. J. Tanninen, Importance of Charge in Nanofiltration, 2004. 〈http://books.google.dk/books/about/Importance-of-Charge-in-Nanofiltration.html?id=nlt8AAAACAAJ&pgis=1〉 (accessed June 19, 2014).
10. A. Morao, A. Alves, M. Afonso, Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: influence of the membrane surface charge density on NF operation, J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 417-428, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.010.
11. V. Freger, Separation of concentrated organic/inorganic salt mixtures by nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 178 (2000) 185-193, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00516-0.
12. R. Hepsen, Y. Kaya, Optimization of membrane fouling using experimental design: an example from dairy wastewater treatment, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012) 16074-16084, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie302450s.
13. B. Van der Bruggen, Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground waters, Water Supply 17 (1999) 55-63.
14. C. Aydiner, Y. Kaya, Z. Beril Gönder, I. Vergili, Evaluation of membrane fouling and flux decline related with mass transport in nanofiltration of tartrazine solution, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 85 (2010) 1229-1240, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2422.
15. K. Boussu, B. Van der Bruggen, A. Volodin, C. Van Haesendonck, J.A. Delcour, P. Van der Meeren, et al., Characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes and comparison with self-made polyethersulfone membranes, Desalination 191 (2006) 245-253, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.025.
16. J. Cho, Effects of molecular weight cutoff, f/k ratio (a hydrodynamic condition), and hydrophobic interactions on natural organic matter rejection and fouling in membranes, J. Water Supply Res. Technol. - AQUA. 51 (2002) 109-123.
17. L. Puro, M. Mänttäri, A. Pihlajamäki, M. Nyström, Characterization of modified nanofiltration membranes by octanoic acid permeation and FTIR analysis, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 84 (2006) 87-96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1205/cherd.04036.
18. G. Bargeman, J.M. Vollenbroek, J. Straatsma, C.G.P.H. Schroën, R.M. Boom, Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention, J. Membr. Sci. 247 (2005) 11-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.05.022.
19. A. Bouchoux, H. Balmann, F. Lutin, Nanofiltration of glucose and sodium lactate solutions variations of retention between single- and mixed-solute solutions, J. Membr. Sci. 258 (2005) 123-132, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.002.
20. A. Escoda, P. Fievet, S. Lakard, A. Szymczyk, S. Déon, Influence of salts on the rejection of polyethyleneglycol by an NF organic membrane: pore swelling and salting-out effects, J. Membr. Sci. 347 (2010) 174-182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.021.
21. J. Luo, Y. Wan, Effect of highly concentrated salt on retention of organic solutes by nanofiltration polymeric membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 372 (2011) 145-153, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.066.
22. M. Dalwani, N.E. Benes, G. Bargeman, D. Stamatialis, M. Wessling, A method for characterizing membranes during nanofiltration at extreme pH, J. Membr. Sci. 363 (2010) 188-194, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.025.
23. P.-Y. Pontalier, A. Ismail, M. Ghoul, Mechanisms for the selective rejection of solutes in nanofiltration membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 12 (1997) 175-181, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(97)00047-6.
24. L. Xu, L.-S. Du, J. He, Effects of operating conditions on membrane charge property and nanofiltration, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 5 (2011) 492-499, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-011-1143-7.
25. C. Mazzoni, S. Bandini, On nanofiltration Desal-5 DK performances with calcium chloride-water solutions, Sep. Purif. Technol. 52 (2006) 232-240, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.04.004.
26. S. Veríssimo, K.-V. Peinemann, J. Bordado, New composite hollow fiber membrane for nanofiltration, Desalination 184 (2005) 1-11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.069.
27. J. Mmbaga, R.E. Hayes, W. Pikus, A. Afacan, D.C. Bressler, Numerical modelling and characterization of nanofiltration membranes for the separation of carbohydrate mixtures, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 89 (2011) 314-324, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20400.
28. R.R. de Souza, R. Bergamasco, S.C. da Costa, X. Feng, S.H.B. Faria, M.L. Gimenes, Recovery and purification of lactose from whey, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 49 (2010) 1137-1143, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.08.015.