On nanofiltration Desal-5 DK performances with calcium chloride-water solutions

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 232-240

  Mazzoni, Carolina ^a   Bandini, Serena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Amphoteric behaviour; Electrolytes; Membrane charge; Nanofiltration; pH

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; ELECTROLYTES; MIXTURES; PH EFFECTS;

AMPHOTERIC BEHAVIOR; MEMBRANE CHARGE; POLYAMIDE DESAL MEMBRANES; SALT CONCENTRATION;

NANOFILTRATION;

EID: 33750938486     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bowen W.R., and Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 263-274
2. Bowen W.R., and Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Inst. Chem. Eng. 76A (1998) 885-893
3. Bowen W.R., and Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 1121-1137
4. Bandini S., and Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 3303-3326
5. Nystrom M., Kaipia L., and Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 98 (1995) 249-262
6. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 117 (1998) 247-256
7. Xu Y., and Lebrun R.E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 93-104
8. Wang X., Wang W., and Wang D. Experimental investigation on separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for inorganic electrolyte solutions. Desalination 145 (2002) 115-122
9. Szoke S., Patzay G., and Weiser L. Characteristics of thin-film nanofiltration membranes at various pH-values. Desalination 151 (2002) 123-129
10. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., and Quéméneur F. Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 231 (2004) 37-46
11. Quin J., Oo M.H., Lee H., and Coniglio B. Effect of feed pH on permeate pH and ion rejection under acidic conditions in NF process. J. Membr. Sci. 232 (2004) 153-159
12. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti J. Retention of mineral salts by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 30 (2003) 47-55
13. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C., Mohammad A.W., and Bowen W.R. Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 169-179
14. Bandini S., Drei J., and Vezzani D. The role of pH and concentration on the ion rejection in polyamide nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 65-74
15. 2 membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 379-389
16. Condom S., Larbot A., Youssi S.A., and Persin M. Use of ultra- and nanofiltration ceramic membranes for desalination. Desalination 168 (2004) 207-213
17. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti J. Analysis of the salt rejection of a titania membrane using the "DSPM" model: effect of pH, salt concentration and nature. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 315-329
18. Bandini S. Modelling the mechanism of charge formation in NF membranes: theory and application. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 75-86
19. Bandini S., and Mazzoni C. Modelling the amphoteric behaviour of polyamide nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 184 (2005) 327-336
20. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., and Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge in nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
21. Afonso M.D., Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 529-541
22. Childress E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
23. Peeters J.M.M., Mulder M.H.V., and Strathmann H. Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 150 (1999) 247-259
24. Tay J.H., Liu J., and Sun D.D. Effect of solution physico-chemistry on the charge property of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 36 (2002) 585-598
25. Zhao Y., Xing W., Xu N., and Wong F. Effects of inorganic electrolytes on zeta potentials of ceramic microfiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 42 (2005) 117-121
26. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Mullet M., Reggiani J.C., and Pagetti J. Comparison of two electrokinetic methods - electroosmosis and streaming potential - to derermine the zeta-potential of plane ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 143 (1998) 189-195
27. Camera-Roda G., Boi C., Saavedra A., and Sarti G.C. Heat and mass transfer boundary layers in radial creeping flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 37 (1994) 2145-2153
28. Yaroshchuk A.E. Dielectric exclusion of ions from membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 85 (2000) 193-230
29. Yaroshchuk A.E. Non-steric mechanisms of nanofiltration: superposition of Donnan and dielectric exclusion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 143-158
30. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., and Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 126 (1997) 91-105
31. Deen W.M. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 33 (1987) 1409-1425
32. Porter M.C. Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration. I&EC Prod. Res. Dev. 11 (1972) 234-248