Effects of operating conditions on membrane charge property and nanofiltration

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 492-499

  Xu, Li ^a   Du, Li Shun ^a   He, Jing ^b  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Lanpec Technologies Co Ltd   (China)

Author keywords

nanofiltration membrane; permeate flux; retention rate; streaming potential; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

EID: 83355165049     PISSN: 20950179     EISSN: 20950187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11705-011-1143-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bowen W R, Mohammad A W, Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 126(1): 91-105.
2. Bowen W R, Welfoot J S. Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimization. Desalination, 2002, 147(1-3): 197-203.
3. Labbez C, Fievet P, Szymczyk A, Thomas F, Simon C, Vidonne A, Pagetti J, Foissy A. A comparison of membrane charge of a low nanofiltration ceramic membrane determined from ionic retention and tangential streaming potential measurements. Desalination, 2002, 147(1-3): 223-229.
4. Navarro R, González M P, Saucedo I, Avila M, Prádanos P, Martínez F, Martín A, Hernández A. Effect of an acidic treatment on the chemical and charge properties of a nanofiltration membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 307(1): 136-148.
5. Teixeira M R, Rosa M J, Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 265(1-2): 160-166.
6. Zhao K S, Ni G Z. Dielectric analysis of nanofiltration membrane in electrolyte solutions: Influences of permittivity of wet membrane and volume charge density on ion permeability. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2011, 661(1): 226-238.
7. Ahmad A L, Ooi B S, Mohammad A W, Choudhury J P. Effect of constricted polymerization time on nanofiltration membrane characteristic and performance: a study using the Donnan steric pore flow model. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2004, 94(1): 394-399.
8. Levenstein R, Hasson D, Semiat R. Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1996, 116(1): 77-92.
9. Lapointe J F, Gauthier S F, Pouliot Y, Bouchard C. Fouling of a nanofiltration membrane by αβ-lactoglobulin tryptic hydrolysate: impact on the membrane sieving and electrostatic properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 253(1-2): 89-102.
10. Ricq L, Pierre A, Bayle S, Reggiani J C. Electrokinetic characterization of polyethersulfone UF membranes. Desalination, 1997, 109(3): 253-261.
11. Peeters J M M, Mulder M H V, Strathmann H. Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membrane. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1999, 150(1-3): 247-259.
12. Szymczyk A, Fievet P, Mullet M, Reggiani J C, Pagetti J. Comparison of two electrokinetic methods-electroosmosis and streaming potential-to determine the Zeta-potential of plane ceramic membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 143(1-2): 189-195.
13. Mo J X, Liu S M. Theory, experimental method and result of the streaming potential. Technology of Water Treatment, 1991, 17(3): 153-161.
14. Wang J, Wang X L. Experimental study of the streaming potential of porous polymer MF membranes. Journal of Lianyungang College of Chemical Technology, 2000, 13(3): 4-6 (in Chinese).
15. Liu X H, Wang X Q, Chen H. Synthesis of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl by non-phosgene method. Journal of Lianyungang College of Chemical Technology, 2000, 13(4): 13-15 (in Chinese).
16. Wang J, Ying A L, Wang X L, Yu B. z potentials and pore surface charge densities of the porous polymer membranes (PMP-013MF membrane). Journal of Lianyungang College of Chemical Technology, 2001, 14(1): 1-4 (in Chinese).
17. Wang J, Wang X L, Ying A L, Yu B. Study of the flow character of porous polymer UF membranes. Journal of Lianyungang College of Chemical Technology, 2001, 14(2): 5-7 (in Chinese).
18. Wang J, Wang X L. Determination of the streaming potential of porous polyacrylonitrile UF membranes. Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology, 2002, 11(1): 38-41 (in Chinese).
19. Xie H, Saito T, Hickner M A. Zeta potential of ion-conductive membranes by streaming current measurements. Langmuir, 2011, 27(8): 4721-4727 (in Chinese).
20. Huisman I H, Prádanos P, Calvo J I, Hernández A. Electroviscous effects, streaming potential, and zeta potential in polycarbonate track-etched membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 178(1-2): 79-92.
21. Pastor R, Calvo J I, Prádanos P, Hernández A. Surface charges and zeta potentials on polyethersulphone heteroporous membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 137(1-2): 109-119.
22. Huisman I H, Prádanos P, Hernández A. Electrokinetic characterisation of ultrafiltration membranes by streaming potential, electroviscous effect, and salt retention. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 178(1-2): 55-64.
23. Kim K J, Fane A G, Nystrom M, Pihlajamaki A, Bowen W R, Mukhtar H. Evaluation of electroosmosis and streaming potential for measurement of electric charges of polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1996, 116(2): 149-159.
24. Martínez F, Martín A, Malfeito J, Palacio L, Prádanos P, Tejerina F, Hernández A. Streaming potential through and on ultrafiltration membranes: influence of salt retention. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 206(1-2): 431-441.
25. Ye N. Research on the membrane streaming potential testing technique and application. Dissertation for the Master degree. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2002 (in Chinese).
26. van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environmental Pollution, 2003, 122(3): 435-445.