Evaluation of membrane fouling and flux decline related with mass transport in nanofiltration of tartrazine solution

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1229-1240

  Aydiner, Coskun ^a   Kaya, Yasemin ^b   Gönder, Zeren Beril ^b   Vergili, Ilda ^b  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Flux decline; Mass transport; Membrane fouling; Nanofiltration; Tartrazine

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC DYE; DYE CONCENTRATION; DYE MOLECULE; DYE SOLUTIONS; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; FLUX DECLINE; GEL LAYERS; MASS TRANSPORT; MATERIAL BALANCE; NEGATIVELY CHARGED MEMBRANES; PERMEATE FLUX; PERMEATION COEFFICIENTS; PORE DIFFUSION; TARTRAZINE; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

DYES; GELS; MASS TRANSFER; MEMBRANE FOULING; NANOFILTRATION; SURFACE DIFFUSION;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

DYE; TARTRAZINE;

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; FOULING PREVENTION; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NANOFILTRATION; PH MEASUREMENT; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 77956498798     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2422     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Safarik I, Rego LFT, Borovska M, Szablewsla EM, Weyda F and Safarikova M, New magnetically responsive yeast-based biosorbent for the efficient removal of water-soluble dyes. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:1551-1556 (2007).
2. Banerjee P, DasGupta S and De S, Removal of dye from aqueous solution using a combination of advanced oxidation process and nanofiltration. J Hazard Mater 140:95-103 (2007).
3. Bielska M and Prochaska K, Dyes separation by means of cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar solutions. Dyes Pigments 74:410-415 (2007).
4. Jain R, Bhargava M and Sharma N, Electrochemical studies on a pharmaceutical azo dye: tartrazine. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:243-247 (2003).
5. Akbari A, Remigy JC and Aptel P, Treatment of textile dye effluent using a polyamide-based nanofiltration membrane. Chem Eng Process 41:601-609 (2002).
6. Mittal A, Kurup L and Mittal J, Freundlich and langmuir adsorption isotherms and kinetics for the removal of tartrazine from aqueous solutions using hen feathers. J Hazard Mater 146:243-248 (2007).
7. Dizge N, Aydiner C, Demirbas E, Kobya M and Kara S, Adsorption of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions by fly ash: kinetic and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 150:737-746 (2008).
8. Modirshahla N, Behnajady MA and Kooshaiian S, Investigation of the effect of different electrode connections on the removal efficiency of tartrazine from aqueous solutions by electrocoagulation. Dyes Pigments 74:249-257 (2007).
9. Lin SH and Peng CF, Continuous treatment of textile wastewater by combined coagulation, electrochemical oxidation and activated sludge. Water Res 30:587-592 (1996).
10. 2/UV and biological treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1239-1245 (2006).
11. Kim TH, Park C, Yang J and Kim S, Comparison of disperse and reactive dye removals by chemical coagulation and Fenton oxidation. J Hazard Mater 112:95-103 (2004).
12. Golob V, Vinder A and Simonič M, Efficiency of the coagulation/ flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents. Dyes Pigments 67:93-97 (2005).
13. Faria PCC, Órfão JJM and Pereira MFR, Adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes on activated carbons with different surface chemistries. Water Res 38:2043-2052 (2004).
14. Bielska M and Prochaska K, Dyes separation by means of cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar solutions. Dyes Pigments 74:410-415 (2007).
15. Mo JH, Lee YH, Kim J, Jeong JY and Jegal J, Treatment of dye aqueous solutions using nanofiltration polyamide composite membranes for the dye wastewater reuse. Dyes Pigments 76:429-434 (2008).
16. Buckley CA, Membrane technology for the treatment of dye-house effluents. Water Sci Technol 25:203-209 (1992).
17. Watters JC, Biagtan E and Senler O, Ultrafiltration of a textile plant effluent. Sep Sci Technol 26:1295-1313 (1991).
18. Gomes AC, Gonçalves IC and De Pinho MN, The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes. J Membr Sci 255:157-165 (2005).
19. Koyuncu I, Direct filtration of Procion dye bath wastewaters by nanofiltration membranes: flux and removal characteristics. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:1219-1224 (2003).
20. Petrinic I, Andersen NPR, Sostar-Turk S and Marechal AML, The removal of reactive dye printing compounds using nanofiltration. Dyes Pigments 74:512-518 (2007).
21. Manttari M, Pihlajamaki A and Nyström M, Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration effiency of NF membranes at different pH. J Membr Sci 280:311-320 (2006).
22. Lazaridis NK, Blöcher C, Dorda J and Matis KA, A hybrid MF process based on flotation. J Membr Sci 228:83-88 (2004).
23. Mavrov V, Erwe T and Chmiel H, Selective separation of heavy metals from industrial wastewater streams by means of heavy metal bonding agents. Water Air Soil Poll 4:147-155 (2004).
24. AWWA-Membrane Technology Research Committee, Committee report: recent advances and research needs in membrane fouling. J Am Water Works Assoc 97:79-89 (2005).
25. Boussu K, Vandecasteele C and Van der Bruggen B, Study of characteristic and the performance of self-made nanoporous polyethersulfone membranes. Polymer 47:3464-3476 (2006).
26. Eliane CV, Willian FC and Cláudio CO, Development of a green chromatographic method for determination of colorants in food samples. Talanta 68:516-521 (2006).
27. ISO 7887 International Standard, Water quality-examination and determination of color, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, (1994).
28. Rahimi M, Madaeni SS and Abbasi K, CFD modeling of permeate flux in cross-flow microfiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 255:23-31 (2005).
29. Tu SC, Ravindran V and Pirbazari M, A pore diffusion transport model for forecasting the performance of membrane processes. J Membr Sci 265:29-50 (2005).
30. Koyuncu I and Topacik D, Effect of organic ion on the separation of salts by nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 195:247-263(2002).
31. Tu SC, Ravindran V, Den W and Pirbazari M, Predictive membrane transport model for nanofiltration processes in water treatment. AIChE Journal 47:1346-1362 (2001).
32. Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Al-Zoubi H and Darwish NA, Prediction of permeate fluxes and rejections of highly concentrated salts in nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 289:40-50 (2007).
33. Zabkova M, Da Silva EAB and Rodrigues AE, Recovery of vanillin from lignin/vanillin mixture by using tubular ceramic ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 301:221-237 (2007).
34. Timmer JMK, Kromkamp J and Robbertsen T, Lactic acid separation from fermentation broths by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. J Membr Sci 92:185-197 (1994).
35. Akay G and Wakeman RJ, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration of surfactant dispersions - an evaluation of published research. T I Chem Eng 71:411-420 (1993).
36. Gupta VK, Hwang ST, Krantz WB and Greenberg AR, Characterization of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane performance for aqueous salt solutions using irreversible thermodynamics. Desalination 208:1-18 (2008).
37. Gekas V and Hallström B, Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow: I. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing Sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J Membr Sci 30:153-170 (1987).
38. Nam S and Tratnyek PG, Reduction of azo dyes with zero-valent iron. Water Res 34:1837-1845 (2000).
39. Lyman WJ, Reehl WF and Rosenblatt DH, Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (1982).
40. Bader MSH, Nanofiltration for oil-fields water injection operations: analysis of concentration polarization. Desalination 201:106-113 (2006).
41. Bacchin P, Aimar P and Field RW, Review-critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications. J Membr Sci 281:42-69 (2006).
42. 4 anions from waters using surfactant enhanced hybrid PAC/MF process. Sep Purif Technol 48:270-280 (2006).
43. Danis U and Aydiner C, Investigation of process performance and fouling mechanisms in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel-contaminated waters. J Hazard Mater 162:577-587 (2009).