Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: A comparison with oesophageal Doppler

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 596-602

  Lorne, E ^a,b   Mahjoub, Y ^a,b   Diouf, M ^a   Sleghem, J ^a   Buchalet, C ^a   Guinot, P G ^a   Petiot, S ^a   Kessavane, A ^a   Dehedin, B ^a   Dupont, H ^a,b  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary, monitoring; Monitoring; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; DESFLURANE; NORADRENALIN; PHENYLEPHRINE; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM; SEVOFLURANE;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPH; ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER MONITORING; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPH; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; AGED; CARDIOPULMONARY, MONITORING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING; OXIMETRY; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; VERY ELDERLY;

CARDIOPULMONARY, MONITORING; MONITORING; ULTRASOUND;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OXIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84908645029     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu136     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 820-6
2. Conway DH, Mayall R, Abdul-Latif MS, Gilligan S, Tackaberry C. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 845-9
3. Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 634-42
4. Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1069-76
5. Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 1997; 315: 909-12
6. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 65-71
7. NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence). Medical technologies guidance MTG3: CardioQODM oesophageal Doppler monitor, 2011. Available from http://guidance.nice.org.uk/MTG3/Guidance/pdf/English
8. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 904-9
9. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgeryand critical care: a meta-Analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220-35
10. Bernstein DP, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB. Limitations of impedance cardiography. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 659-60
11. Critchley LA, Calcroft RM, Tan PY, Kew J, Critchley JA. The effect of lung injury and excessive lung fluid, on impedance cardiac output measurements, in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 679-85
12. Fellahi JL, Caille V, Charron C, Deschamps-Berger PH, Vieillard-Baron A. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 1553-9
13. Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 293: H583-9
14. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2008; 22: 113-9
15. Fagnoul D, Vincent JL, Backer DD. Cardiac output measurements using the bioreactance technique in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012; 16: 460
16. Kober D, Trepte C, Petzoldt M, et al. Cardiac index assessment using bioreactance in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery in ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27: 621-7
17. Kupersztych-Hagege E, Teboul JL, Artigas A, et al. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 961-6
18. AroomKR, HartingMT,Cox CS Jr., RadharkrishnanRS, Smith C, Gill BS. Bioimpedance analysis: a guide to simple design and implementation. J Surg Res 2009; 153: 23-30
19. Lababidi Z, Ehmke DA, Durnin RE, Leaverton PE, Lauer RM. The first derivative thoracic impedance cardiogram. Circulation 1970; 41: 651-8
20. Singer M, Bennett ED. Noninvasive optimization of left ventricular filling using esophageal Doppler. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 1132-7
21. Bernardin G, Tiger F, Fouche R, Mattei M. Continuous noninvasive measurement of aortic blood flow in critically ill patients with a newesophageal echo-Doppler system. J Crit Care 1998; 13: 177-83
22. Guinot PG, de Broca B, Abou Arab O, et al. Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 28-33
23. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, et al. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-Abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1824-9
24. Fosgate GT. Practical sample size calculations for surveillance and diagnostic investigations. J Vet Diagn Invest 2009; 21: 3-14
25. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 536-46
26. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1180-92
27. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-Analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91
28. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altmanmethodtomeasure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 309-11
29. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Pulmonary-Artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2213-24
30. Zollner C, Goetz AE,Weis M, et al. Continuous cardiac output measurements do not agree with conventional bolus thermodilution cardiac output determination. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48: 1143-7
31. MihmFG, Gettinger A,HansonCWIII, et al.Amulticenterevaluation of a new continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter system. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1346-50
32. Valtier B, Cholley BP, Belot JP, de la Coussaye JE, Mateo J, Payen DM. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 77-83
33. Roeck M, Jakob SM, Boehlen T, Brander L, Knuesel R, Takala J. Changein strokevolumein responseto fluid challenge: assessment using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1729-35
34. Kim K, Kwok I, Chang H, Han T. Comparison of cardiac outputs of major burn patients undergoing extensive early escharectomy: esophageal Doppler monitor versus thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter. J Trauma 2004; 57: 1013-7
35. Monnet X, Rienzo M,OsmanD, et al. EsophagealDopplermonitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1195-201
36. Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperativehemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 340-53
37. Leather HA,Wouters PF. Oesophageal Doppler monitoring overestimates cardiac output during lumbar epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 794-7
38. Cariou A, Monchi M, Joly LM, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by aortic blood flow determination: evaluation of the Sometec Dynemo-3000 system. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 2066-72
39. Chytra I, Pradl R, Bosman R, Pelnar P, Kasal E, Zidkova A. Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11: R24
40. Fuller HD. The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: a meta-Analysis. Clin Invest Med 1992; 15: 103-12
41. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-Analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1203-13
42. Doering L, Lum E, Dracup K, Friedman A. Predictors of betweenmethod differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 1667-73
43. Genoni M, Pelosi P, Romand JA, Pedoto A, Moccetti T, Malacrida R. Determination of cardiac output during mechanical ventilation by electrical bioimpedance or thermodilution in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1441-5
44. Marik PE, Pendelton JE, Smith R. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1545-50
45. Young JD, McQuillan P. Comparison of thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for the measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 58-62
46. Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Rebet O, Massetti M, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL. A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26: 217-22
47. Critchley LA, Leung DH, Short TG. Abdominal surgery alters the calibration of bioimpedance cardiac output measurement. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1996; 13: 1-8
48. Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, James AE. The effect of peripheral resistance on impedance cardiography measurements in the anesthetized dog. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1708-12
49. Peng ZY, Critchley LA, Fok BS. An investigation to show the effect of lung fluid on impedance cardiac output in the anaesthetized dog. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 458-64
50. Bikker IG, Preis C, Egal M, Bakker J,GommersD. Electricalimpedance tomography measured at two thoracic levels can visualize the ventilation distribution changes at the bedside during a decremental positive end-expiratory lung pressure trial. Crit Care 2011; 15: R193
51. Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38: 963-74
52. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreementinmethodcomparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-60
53. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist 1979; 7: 1-26