Exploring the relationship between self the relationship vocabulary learning and web-based collaboration

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 404-419

  Liu, Sarah Hsueh Jui ^a   Lan, Yu Ju ^a,b   Ho, Cloudia Ya Yu ^a  

^a KAINAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

English as a foreign language (EFL); Self regulated learning (SRL); Vocabulary strategy use; Web based collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908556831     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bedell, D. A., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Cross-cultural comparisons of language learning strategies in the People's Republic of China and other countries. In R. L. Oxford(Ed.) Language learning strategies around the worlds: Cross-cultural perspectives (Technical Report #13) (pp. 47-60). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai=i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre
2. Bown, J. (2009). Self-regulatory strategies and agency in self-instructed language learning: A situated view. The Modern Language Journal, 93(4), 570-583
3. Chang, M. M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a Web-based instruction - An investigation of Motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217-230
4. Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between students' self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9-15
5. Cho, M. H., & Jonassen, D. (2009). Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 117-138
6. Cho, M. H., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students' self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69-75
7. Chisholm, R. M. (1990). Coping with the problems of collaborative writing. Writing Across the Curriculum, 2, 90-108
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340
9. Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78
10. English Club. (2010). Memorandum. Retrieved August 26, 2011, from http://www.englishclub.com/esl-exams/ets-toeic-practice-7.htm
11. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE Publication Ltd
12. Gao, F. (2013). A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76-83
13. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning. The role of attitudes and motivation. London, UK: Edward Arnold
14. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers
15. Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers' technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367
16. Hsin, C. I., Lin, S. S. J., & Yeh, C. C. (2005). Pilot analysis of motivational strategies in learning calculus among technology college students: Motivational strategies in learning calculus. Journal of National University of Tainan, 39(2), 65-82
17. Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials. Computers & Education, 48, 680-699
18. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187
19. Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic Web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91-109
20. Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100-122
21. Lai, C., & Gu, M. Y. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317-335
22. Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students' use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2), 569-579
23. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. van Patten & J. William (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 201-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
24. Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, C. Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104
25. Levine, A., Reves, T., & Leaver, B. L. (1996). Relationship between language learning strategies and Israeli versus Russian cultural-educational factors. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (Technical Report13) (pp. 35-45). Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii
26. Liu, S. H. J., Lan, Y. J., & Jenkins, J. R. (in press). Technology-enhanced strategy use for second language vocabulary acquisition. English Teaching & Learning, 38(2), 105-132
27. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43
28. Mendenhall, A., & Johnson, T. E. (2010). Fostering the development of critical thinking skills, and reading comprehension of undergraduates using a Web 2.0 tool coupled with a learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 263-276
29. Mizumoto, A., & Takeuchi, O. (2009). Examining the effectiveness of explicit instruction of vocabulary learning strategies with Japanese EFL university students. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 425-449
30. Nyikos, M., & Fan, M. (2007). A review of vocabulary learning strategies: focus on language proficiency and learner voice. In Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (Eds.) Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 251-273). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
31. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle/Cengage
32. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson/Longman
33. Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291-300
34. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press
35. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407
36. Pintrich, R. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40
37. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813
38. Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 103-123
39. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
40. Schmitt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to the New Century (Technical Report #11) (pp. 9-70). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai=i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre
41. Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feedback via Instant Messenger learning activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS dyads. Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 22(3), 467-496
42. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
43. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251-274
44. Tsai, P. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). College students' experience of online argumentation: Conceptions, approaches and the conditions of using question prompts. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 38-47
45. Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78-102
46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
47. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 13(2&3), 7-26
48. Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2010). The effects of task type in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Journal of the European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 20-38
49. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339
50. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17