A complex system approach to address world challenges in food and agriculture

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-32

  van Mil, H G J ^a   Foegeding, E A ^b   Windhab, E J ^c   Perrot, N ^d   van der Linden, E ^a,e  

^a TOP INSTITUTE FOOD AND NUTRITION   (Netherlands)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

^e WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURE; FOOD SUPPLY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LAND USE;

GLOBAL CHALLENGES; GLOBAL RESOURCES; INTERVENTION STRATEGY; POLITICAL STABILITY; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; SUSTAINABLE USE; SYSTEM APPROACH;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84908480697     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.07.005     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Ahn Y.-Y., Ahnert S.E., Bagrow J.P., Barabasi A.L. Flavor network and the principles of food pairing. Scientific Reports 2011, 1(196).
2. Ahnert S.E. Network analysis and data mining in food science: the emergence of computational gastronomy. Flavour 2013, January 9, 2(1):2-4.
3. Allen P.M., McGlade J.M. Modelling complex human systems: a fisheries example. European Journal of Operational Research 1987, 30(2):147-167.
4. Alon U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nature Reviews. Genetics 2007, 8(6):450-461.
5. Bakker B.M., van Eunen K., Jeneson J.A.L., van Riel N.A.W., Bruggeman F.J., Bruggeman T.B. System biology from microorganisms to human metabolic diseases - the role of detailed kinetic. Biochemical Society Transactions 2010, 38(5):1294-1301.
6. Barabási A.-L., Oltvai Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews. Genetics 2004, 5(2):101-113.
7. Barenblatt G.I. Scaling 2003, Cambridge University Press. 1st ed.
8. Barrière O., Lutton E., Wuillemin P.-H., Baudrit C., Sicard M., Perrot N. Cooperative coevolution for agrifood process modeling. Studies in computational intelligence 2013, Vol. 447:247-287. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. E. Tantar, A.-A. Tantar, P. Bouvry, P. Del Moral, P. Legrand, C.A. Coello Coello (Eds.).
9. Bartoshuk L.M. Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chemical Senses 2000, 25(4):447-460.
10. Bar-Yam Y. Dynamics of complex systems studies in nonlinearity 1997, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusets. R.L. Devaney (Ed.).
11. Bar-Yam Y. About engineering complex systems: multiscale analysis and evolutionary engineering. Engineering self-organising systems: Methodologies and applications 2005, Vol. 3464:16-31. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
12. Bar-Yam Y., Harmon D., Bar-Yam Y. Computationally tractable pairwise complexity profile. Complexity 2013, 18(5):20-27.
13. Baudrit C., Sicard M., Wuillemin P.H., Perrot N. Towards a global modelling of the camembert-type cheese ripening process by coupling heterogeneous knowledge with dynamic Bayesian networks. Journal of Food Engineering 2010, 98(3):283-293.
14. Berry T.K., Yang X., Foegeding E.A. Foams prepared from whey protein isolate and egg white protein: 2. Changes associated with angel food cake functionality. Journal of Food Science 2009, 74(5):E269-E277.
15. Bettencourt L.M., Lobo J., Strumsky D., West G.B. Urban scaling and its deviations: revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS One 2010, 5(11):e13541.
16. Bonabeau E., Meyer C. Swarm intelligence - a whole new way to think about business. Harvard business Review 2001, 79(5):106-114.
17. Brattico P. Shallow reductionism and the problem of complexity in psychology. Theory & Psychology 2008, 18(4):483-504.
18. Chavalarias D., Cointet J.-P. Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical science mapping, methodology and case study. Scientometrics 2008, 75(1):37-50.
19. Coppens M.-O. A nature-inspired approach to reactor and catalysis engineering. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2012, 1(3):281-289.
20. Crutchfield J.P. Between order and chaos. Nature Physics 2011, 8(1):17-24.
21. Crutchfield J.P., Machta J. Introduction to focus issue on "randomness, structure, and causality: measures of complexity from theory to applications". Chaos 2011, 21(3):037101.
22. Csete M.E., Doyle J.C. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2002, 295(5560):1664-1669.
23. French S. Decision theory: An introduction to the mathematics of rationality 1986, 448. Ellis Horwood, Ltd.
24. Frenken K. Techological innovation and complexity theory. Economics of Innovation, New Technologies 2006, 15(2):137-155.
25. Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and bioconductor 2005, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. R. Gentleman, V. Carey, W. Huber, R. Irizarry, S. Dudoit (Eds.).
26. Helbing D. Pluralistic modeling of complex systems 2010, 1-20. Retrieved from, Accessed 03.02.13. http://web.sg.ethz.ch/wps/pdf/CCSS-10-009.pdf.
27. Helbing D. Quantitative sociodynamics 2010, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1st ed.
28. Jaynes E.T. Probability theory the logic of science 2003, Cambridge University Press. 1st ed.
29. Kello C.T., Brown G.D.a., Ferrer-I-Cancho R., Holden J.G., Linkenkaer-Hansen K., Rhodes T., et al. Scaling laws in cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14(5):223-232.
30. Kitano H. Biological robustness. Nature Reviews. Genetics 2004, 5(11):826-837.
31. Lagi M., Bertrand K.Z., Bar-yam Y. The food crises and political instability in North Africa and the Middle East 2011, arXiv:1108.2455 1-15.
32. Liu A.J., Nagel S.R. Jamming is not just cool any more. Nature 1998, 396:21-22.
33. Lutton E., Paris-sud U., Cedex F.O., Team A., Île-de-france I.S., Graphdice U.S. Visual analytics of EA data. GECCO'11 Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2011, 145-146. N. Krasnogor (Ed.).
34. MacKay D.J.C. Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms 2003, Cambridge University Press.
35. Meydani M., Hasan S.T. Dietary polyphenols and obesity. Nutrients 2010, 2(7):737-751.
36. Murphy R. The complexity of the problem of obesity. Medical Clinics of North America 1960, 44(2):439-445.
37. Oono Y. The nonlinear world - conceptual analysis and phenomenology 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
38. Pernell C.W., Luck P.J., Foegeding E.A., Daubert C.R. Heat-induced changes in angel food cakes containing egg-white protein or whey protein isolate. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67(8):2945-2951.
39. Perrot N., Trelea I.C., Baudrit C., Trystram G., Bourgine P. Modelling and analysis of complex food systems: state of the art and new trends. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2011, 22(6):304-314.
40. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. The influence of the feel of product packaging on the perception of the oral-somatosensory texture of food. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26(1):67-73.
41. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Velasco C., Spence C. Exploring implicit and explicit crossmodal colour-flavour correspondences in product packaging. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25(2):148-155.
42. Razavi A., Moschoyiannis S., Krause P. An open digital environment to support business ecosystems. Peer-to-peer Networking and Applications 2009, 2(4):367-397.
43. Rolls E.T. Taste, olfactory and food texture reward processing in the brain and obesity. International Journal of Obesity 2011, 35(4):550-561.
44. Sambrook T., Whiten A. On the nature of complexity in cognitive and behavioural science. Theory & Psychology 1997, 7(2):191-213.
45. Sornette D. Critical phenomena in natural sciences 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
46. Spence C., Harrar V., Piqueras-Fiszman B. Assessing the impact of the tableware and other contextual variables on multisensory flavour perception. Flavour 2012, 1(1):7.
47. Teusink B., Westerhoff H.V., Bruggeman F.J. Comparative systems biology: from bacteria to man. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-systems Biology and Medicine 2010, 2(5):518-532.
48. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1974, 185:1124-1131.
49. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 1983, 90:293-315.
50. Wagner A. The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 2012, 279(1732):1249-1258. 10.1098/rspb.2011.2293.
51. Waldrop M.M. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos 1993, Simon & Schuster. 1st ed.
52. Wolfram S. A new kind of science 2002, Wolfram Media. 1st ed.
53. Yang X., Foegeding E.A. The stability and physical properties of egg white and whey protein foams explained based on microstructure and interfacial properties. Food Hydrocolloids 2011, 25(7):1687-1701.
54. P. Allen, 2012, http://ezines.tifn.nl/intouch/july2012/06-peter-allen. html.
55. Hersher, R. (2012). Nature blog: FoldIt game's next play: Crowdsourcing better drug design. http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/2012/04/foldit-games-next-play-crowdsourcing-betterdrug- design.html?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureBlogs Accessed date 31.07.13.
56. M. Lagi, Y. Bar-Yam, K. Z. Bertrand, Y. Bar-Yam, UPDATE February 2012 d The food crises: Predictive validation of a quantitative model of food prices including speculators and ethanol conversion. arXiv:1203.1313, Accessed date: 31.07.13.
57. Sankar, S. (2012). TED lecture: The rise of human computer cooperation. http://www.ted.com/talks/shyam_sankar_the_rise_of_human_computer_cooperation.html Accessed date 31.07.13.
58. Rosling, H. (2011). TED lecture: New insights on poverty. http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_reveals_new_insights_on_poverty.html Accessed date 31.07.13.
59. Windhab, E. J. (Sep 30, 2008). A process engineering approach. Dialogue on food, health and society. Sept. 29 e 30, 2008. Swiss Research Centre. http://www.zhaw.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/life_sciences/Dateien/News_Veranstaltungen/Tagungen/Dialogue_Food_Health_Society/Presentation_Erich_Windhab.pdf Accessed date 31.07.13.