Comparative systems biology: From bacteria to man

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 518-532

  Teusink, Bas ^a,b,c   Westerhoff, Hans V ^a,b,d   Bruggeman, Frank J ^a,e,f  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Netherlands Institute Systems Biology (NISB)   (Netherlands)

^c Kluyver Center for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e NISB   (Netherlands)

^f CWI   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PROKARYOTA;

ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GLYCOLYSIS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DISCOVERY; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; GENOMICS; GLYCOLYSIS; HUMANS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 79952117091     PISSN: 19395094     EISSN: 1939005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.74     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Warnecke F, Luginbuhl P, Ivanova N, Ghassemian M, Richardson TH, et al. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 2007, 450:560-565.
2. Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 2004, 304:66-74.
3. Vieites JM, Guazzaroni ME, Beloqui A, Golyshin PN, Ferrer M. Metagenomics approaches in systems microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2009, 33:236-255.
4. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 2008 322:104-110.
5. Huynen MA, Snel B, van Noort V. Comparative genomics for reliable protein-function prediction from genomic data. Trends Genet 2004, 20:340-344.
6. van Noort V, Snel B,HuynenMA. Predicting gene function by conserved co-expression. Trends Genet 2003, 19:238-242.
7. Kensche PR, van Noort V, Dutilh BE, Huynen MA. Practical and theoretical advances in predicting the function of a protein by its phylogenetic distribution. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface/the Royal Society 2008, 5:151-170.
8. Jiang Z. Protein function predictions based on the phylogenetic profile method. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 2008, 28:233-238.
9. Molenaar D, Bringel F, Schuren FH, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ, et al. Exploring Lactobacillus plantarum genome diversity by using microarrays. J Bacteriol 2005, 187:6119-6127.
10. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009, 458:337-341.
11. Rao CV, Kirby JR, Arkin AP. Phosphatase localization in bacterial chemotaxis: divergent mechanisms, convergent principles. Phys Biol 2005, 2:148-158.
12. Alon U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:450-461.
13. Bruggeman FJ, Westerhoff HV. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol 2007, 15:45-50.
14. Kelley BP, Yuan B, Lewitter F, Sharan R, Stockwell BR, et al. PathBLAST: a tool for alignment of protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:W83-W88.
15. Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407:651-654.
16. DurotM, Bourguignon PY, Schachter V. Genome-scale models of bacterial metabolism: reconstruction and applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2009, 33:164-190.
17. Feist AM, Herrgard MJ, Thiele I, Reed JL, Palsson BO. Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009, 7:129-143.
18. Francke C, Siezen RJ, Teusink B. Reconstructing the metabolic network of a bacterium from its genome. Trends Microbiol 2005, 13:550-558.
19. Teusink B, Van Enckevort FHJ, Francke C, Wiersma A, Wegkamp A, et al. In silico reconstruction of the metabolic pathways of Lactobacillus plantarum: comparing predictions of nutrient requirements with those from growth experiments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:7253-7262.
20. Green ML, Karp PD. A Bayesian method for identifying missing enzymes in predicted metabolic pathway databases. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:76.
21. Feist AM, Henry CS, Reed JL, Krummenacker M, Joyce AR, et al. A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:121.
22. Poolman MG, Bonde BK, Gevorgyan A, Patel HH, Fell DA. Challenges to be faced in the reconstruction of metabolic networks from public databases. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 2006, 153:379-384.
23. Notebaart RA, van Enckevort FH, Francke C, Siezen RJ, Teusink B. Accelerating the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:296.
24. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:75.
25. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, et al. The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D623-D631.
26. Herrgard MJ, Swainston N, Dobson P, Dunn WB, Arga KY, et al. A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1155-1160.
27. Price ND, Reed JL, Palsson BO. Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004, 2:886-897.
28. Blank LM, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Large-scale 13C-flux analysis reveals mechanistic principles of metabolic network robustness to null mutations in yeast. Genome Biol 2005, 6:R49.
29. Notebaart RA, Teusink B, Siezen RJ, Papp B. Coregulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than network distance. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4.
30. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD. Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast. Nature 2004, 429:661-664.
31. Bro C, Nielsen J. Impact of 'ome' analyses on inverse metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 2004, 6:204-211.
32. Ibarra RU, Edwards JS, Palsson BO. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature 2002, 420:186-189.
33. Ihmels J, Levy R, Barkai N. Principles of transcriptional control in the metabolic network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:86-92.
34. Kharchenko P, Church GM, Vitkup D. Expression dynamics of a cellular metabolic network. Mol Syst Biol 2005, 1:2005 0016.
35. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, et al. STRING 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D412-D416.
36. Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:326-332.
37. Pfeiffer T, Sanchez-Valdenebro I, Nuno JC, Montero F, Schuster S. METATOOL: for studying metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 1999, 15:251-257.
38. Poolman MG, Sebu C, Pidcock MK, Fell DA. Modular decomposition of metabolic systems via null-space analysis. J Theor Biol 2007, 249:691-705.
39. Reed JL, Palsson BO. Genome-scale in silico models of E. coli have multiple equivalent phenotypic states: assessment of correlated reaction subsets that comprise network states. Genome Res 2004, 14:1797-1805.
40. Rossell S, van der Weijden CC, Lindenbergh A, van Tuijl A, Francke C, et al. Unraveling the complexity of flux regulation: a new method demonstrated for nutrient starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:2166-2171.
41. Daran-Lapujade P, Rossell S, van Gulik WM, Luttik MA, de Groot MJ, et al. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:15753-15758.
42. Burgard AP, Nikolaev EV, Schilling CH, Maranas CD. Flux coupling analysis of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions. Genome Res 2004, 14:301-312.
43. Notebaart RA, Kensche PR, Huynen MA, Dutilh BE. Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution. Genome Biol 2009, 10:R19.
44. Dandekar T, Schuster S, Snel B, Huynen M, Bork P. Pathway alignment: application to the comparative analysis of glycolytic enzymes. Biochem J 1999, 343(Pt 1):115-124.
45. Kauffman KJ, Prakash P, Edwards JS. Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003, 14:491-496.
46. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:119.
47. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:125-130.
48. Teusink B, Wiersma A, Molenaar D, Francke C, de Vos WM, et al. Analysis of growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a complex medium using a genome-scale metabolic model. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:40041-40048.
49. van Dijken JP, Weusthuis RA, Pronk JT. Kinetics of growth and sugar consumption in yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1993, 63:343-352.
50. Vemuri GN, Altman E, Sangurdekar DP, Khodursky AB, Eiteman MA. Overflow metabolism in Escherichia coli during steady-state growth: transcriptional regulation and effect of the redox ratio. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:3653-3661.
51. Teusink B, Wiersma A, Jacobs L, Notebaart RA, Smid EJ. Understanding the adaptive growth strategy of L. plantarum on glycerol by in silico optimization. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5(6).
52. Selinger DW, Saxena RM, Cheung KJ, Church GM, Rosenow C. Global RNA half-life analysis in Escherichia coli reveals positional patterns of transcript degradation. Genome Res 2003, 13:216-223.
53. Rosenfeld N, Young JW, Alon U, Swain PS, Elowitz MB. Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Science 2005, 307:1962-1965.
54. Cai L, Dalal CK, Elowitz MB. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature 2008, 455:485-490.
55. Acar M, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat Genet 2008, 40:471-475.
56. Fell D. Understanding the Control ofMetabolism. London: Portland Press; 1997.
57. Heinrich R, Schuster S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems. New York: Chapman Hall; 1996..
58. Fell DA. Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. Biochem J 1992, 286:313-330.
59. Bruggeman FJ, Snoep JL, Westerhoff HV. Control, responses and modularity of cellular regulatory networks: a control analysis perspective. IET Systems Biology 2008, 2:397-410.
60. Van Aelst L, Hohmann S, Bulaya B, de Koning W, Sierkstra L, et al. Molecular cloning of a gene involved in glucose sensing in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 1993, 8:927-943.
61. Hohmann S, Huse K, Valentin E, Mbonyi K, Thevelein JM, et al. Glucose-induced regulatory defects in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae byp1 growth initiation mutant and identification of MIG1 as a partial suppressor. J Bacteriol 1992, 174:4183-4188.
62. Bell W, Klaassen P, Ohnacker M, Boller T, Herweijer M, et al. Characterization of the 56-kDa subunit of yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and cloning of its gene reveal its identity with the product of CIF1, a regulator of carbon catabolite inactivation. Eur J Biochem 1992, 209:951-959.
63. Hohmann S, Bell W, Neves MJ, Valckx D, Thevelein JM. Evidence for trehalose-6-phosphate-dependent and -independent mechanisms in the control of sugar influx into yeast glycolysis. MolMicrobiol 1996, 20:981-991.
64. Thevelein JM, Hohmann S. Trehalose synthase: guard to the gate of glycolysis in yeast? Trends Biochem Sci 1995, 20:3-10.
65. Teusink B, Walsh MC, van Dam K, Westerhoff HV. The danger of metabolic pathways with turbo design. Trends Biochem Sci 1998, 23:162-169.
66. Melendez-Hevia E, Waddell TG, Heinrich R, Montero F. Theoretical approaches to the evolutionary optimization of glycolysis-chemical analysis. Eur J Biochem 1997, 244:527-543.
67. Stephani A, Nuno JC, Heinrich R. Optimal stoichiometric designs of ATP-producing systems as determined by an evolutionary algorithm. J Theor Biol 1999, 199:45-61.
68. Teusink B, Passarge J, Reijenga CA, Esgalhado E, van der Weijden CC, et al. Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. Eur J Biochem 2000, 267:5313-5329.
69. Teusink B, Westerhoff HV. 'Slave' metabolites and enzymes. A rapid way of delineating metabolic control. Eur J Biochem 2000, 267:1889-1893.
70. Hofmeyr JH. Metabolic regulation: a control analytic perspective. J Bioenerg Biomembr 1995, 27:479-490.
71. Hofmeyr JS, Cornish-Bowden A. Regulating the cellular economy of supply and demand. FEBS Lett 2000, 476:47-51.
72. Kahn D, Westerhoff HV. The regulatory strength: how to be precise about regulation and homeostasis. Acta Biotheor 1993, 41:85-96.
73. Jansen ML, Daran-Lapujade P, de Winde JH, Piper MD, Pronk JT. Prolonged maltose-limited cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae selects for cells with improved maltose affinity and hypersensitivity. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70:1956-1963.
74. Wilson JE. Hexokinases. Reviews of Physiology, BIochemistry and Pharmacology 1995, 126:65-198.
75. Agius L. Glucokinase and molecular aspects of liver glycogen metabolism. Biochem J 2008, 414:1-18.
76. Berman HK, Newgard CB. Fundamental metabolic differences between hepatocytes and islet beta-cells revealed by glucokinase overexpression. Biochemistry 1998, 37:4543-4552.
77. Wang H, Iynedjian PB. Acute glucose intolerance in insulinoma cells with unbalanced overexpression of glucokinase. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:25731-25736.
78. Wang H, Iynedjian PB. Modulation of glucose responsiveness of insulinoma beta-cells by graded overexpression of glucokinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:4372-4377.
79. Iynedjian PB. Glycolysis, turbo design and the endocrine pancreatic beta cell. Trends Biochem Sci 1998, 23:467-468.
80. Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006, 70:939-1031.
81. Neves AR, Pool WA, Kok J, Kuipers OP, Santos H. Overview on sugar metabolism and its control in Lactococcus lactis - the input from in vivo NMR. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005, 29:531-554.
82. Gancedo JM. The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008, 32:673-704.
83. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR. How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annual review of genetics 2008, 42:27-81.
84. Hellemond JJ, Bakker BM, Tielens AG. Energy metabolism and its compartmentation in Trypanosoma brucei. Adv Microb Physiol 2005, 50:199-226.
85. Bakker BM, Mensonides FI, Teusink B, van Hoek P, Michels PA, et al. Compartmentation protects trypanosomes from the dangerous design of glycolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:2087-2092.
86. Haanstra JR, van Tuijl A, Kessler P, Reijnders W, Michels PA, et al. Compartmentation prevents a lethal turbo-explosion of glycolysis in trypanosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:17718-17723.
87. Gerber S, Assmus H, Bakker B, Klipp E. Drug-efficacy depends on the inhibitor type and the target position in a metabolic network-a systematic study. J Theor Biol 2008, 252:442-455.
88. Hornberg JJ, Bruggeman FJ, Bakker BM, Westerhoff HV. Metabolic control analysis to identify optimal drug targets. Progress in drug research Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung 2007, 64(171):173-189.
89. Bakker BM, Michels PA, Opperdoes FR, Westerhoff HV. What controls glycolysis in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei? J Biol Chem 1999, 274:14551-14559.
90. Bakker BM, Assmus HE, Bruggeman F, Haanstra JR, Klipp E, et al.Network-based selectivity of antiparasitic inhibitors.Mol Biol Rep 2002, 29:1-5.
91. VicecontiM, ClapworthyG, Van Sint Jan S. The Virtual Physiological Human - A European Initiative for in silicoHumanModelling. J Physiol Sci 2008, 58:441-446.
92. Lazebnik Y. Can a biologist fix a radio?-Or, what I learned while studying apoptosis. Cancer cell 2002, 2:179-182.
93. Pedersen PL. Warburg, me and Hexokinase 2: Multiple discoveries of key molecular events underlying one of cancers' most common phenotypes, the "Warburg Effect", i.e., elevated glycolysis in the presence of oxygen. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2007, 39:211-222.
94. Deberardinis RJ, Sayed N, Ditsworth D, Thompson CB. Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2008, 18:54-61.
95. Kelloff GJ, Hoffman JM, Johnson B, Scher HI, Siegel BA, et al. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11:2785-2808.