Social network site use, mobile personal talk and social capital among teenagers

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue , 2014, Pages 228-235

  Xie, Wenjing ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Facebook; Mobile communication; Mobile phone; Smartphone; Social capital; Social media; Social network site; Teenager

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR TELEPHONES; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

FACEBOOK; MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS; SOCIAL CAPITALS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK SITES; TEENAGER;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84908456256     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.042     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adler, E. (2014). Social media engagement: The surprising facts about how much time people spend on the major social networks. 〈http:// www.businessinsider.com/social-media-engagement-statistics-2013-12〉 Retrieved 21.08.14.
2. Adler, P., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
3. Ahn, J. (2011). Digital divides and social network sites: Which students participate in social media? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 147-163.
4. Ahn, J. (2012). Teenagers' experiences with SNSs: Relationships to bridging and Bonding Social Capital. Information Society, 28, 99-109.
5. Allan, G. (1979). A sociology of friendship and kinship. London: Unwin Hyman.
6. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. Social Education, 67(6), 333-337.
7. Boase, J., & Kobayashi, T. (2008). Kei-Tying teens: Using mobile phone e-mail to bond, bridge, and break with social ties - A study of Japanese adolescents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(12), 930-943.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
9. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. P. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Brandtzæg, P. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications - A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 467-488.
11. Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In CHI'11 Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 571-580).
12. Campbell, S., & Kwak, N. (2010a). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60, 536-555.
13. Campbell, S., & Kwak, N. (2010b). Mobile communication and social capital: An analysis of geographically differentiated usage patterns. New Media & Society, 12(3), 435-451.
14. Campbell, S., & Kwak, N. (2011a). Political involvement in "mobilized" society: The interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1005-1024.
15. Campbell, S., & Kwak, N. (2011b). Mobile communication and civil society: Linking patterns and places of use to engagement with others in public. Human Communication Research, 37, 207-222.
16. Carpini, D. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
17. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
18. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Collins, N., & Miller, L. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457-475.
20. Dekker, P., & Uslaner, E. (2001). Introduction. In E. M. Uslander (Ed.), Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge.
21. Donath, J., & boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
22. Doutherty, H. (2010). Facebook reaches top U.S. ranking. 〈http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/05/facebook-reaches-top- ranking-in-us/〉 Retrieved 05.03.10.
23. Eagle, N. (2004). Can serendipity be planned. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 10-14.
24. Ellison, N., & boyd, D. (2013). Sociality through Social Network Sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151-172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends: Social capital and college students' use of online SNSs. Journal of Computer-MediatedCommunication, 12(4). article 1.
26. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873-892.
27. Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
28. Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2011). Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 19-32). Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
29. Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 217-251.
30. Facebook (2014). Facebook statistics. 〈http://www.statisticbrain.com/facebookstatistics/〉 Retrieved 01.07.14.
31. Gergen, K. (2008). Mobile communication and the transformation of the democratic process. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 297-310). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32. Goldsmith, D. J., & Baxter, L. A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk a taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 87-114.
33. Goodman, J. (2005). Linking mobile phone ownership and use to social capital in rural South Africa and Tanzania. Intermedia, 33(4), 26-41.
34. Habuchi, I., Dobashi, S., Tsuji, I., & Iwata, K. (2005). Ordinary usage of new media: Internet usage via mobile phone in Japan. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 14(1), 94-108.
35. Hampton, K., Goulet, L., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and out lives. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. 〈http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks/Summary.aspx〉 Retrieved 16.06.11.
36. Hampton, K., Sessions, L., & Her, E. (2011). Core networks, social isolation, and new media. Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 130-155.
37. Hancock, J., Toma, C., & Fenner, K. (2008). I know something you don't: The use of symmetric personal information for interpersonal advantage. In Proc. CSCW' 08: ACM (pp. 413-416), New York.
38. Hanrath, J., & Leggewie, C. (2013). Revolution 2.0? The role of digital media in political mobilization and protest. 〈http://www.globale-trends.de/fileadmin/ Redaktion/Globale-Trends- 2013/gt-2013-hanrath-leggewie-en.pdf〉.
39. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276-297.
40. Johnston, K., Tanner, M., Lalla, N., & Kawalski, D. (2013). Social capital: The benefit of Facebook 'friends'. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24-36.
41. Johnson, T., & Perlmutter, D. (Eds.). (2011). New media, campaigning and the 2008 Facebook election. New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Jung, J., Chan-Olmsted, S., & Kim, Y. (2013). From access to utilization factors affecting smartphone application use and its impacts on social and human capital acquisition in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 715-735.
43. Kann, M. E., Berry, J., Grant, C., & Zager, P. (2007). The Internet and youth political participation. First Monday, 12(8). 〈http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/ article/view/1977/1852 〉 Retrieved 06.08.07.
44. Kavanaugh, A., & Patterson, S. (2001). The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 496-509.
45. Kwak, N., Campbell, S. W., Choi, J., & Bae, S. Y. (2011). Mobile communication and public affairs engagement in Korea: An examination of non-linear relationships between mobile phone use and engagement across age groups. Asian Journal of Communication, 21 (5), 485-503.
46. Lampe, C., Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. (2013). Users and nonusers: Interactions between levels of Facebook adoption and social capital. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 809-820). New York, ACM.
47. Law, P. L., & Peng, Y. (2008). Mobile networks: Migrant workers in southern China. In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 55-64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting. 〈http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/ Teens-and-Sexting.aspx〉 Retrieved 04.07.10.
49. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. 〈http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Social-Networking-Websites-and- Teens.aspx〉 Retrieved 07.01.07.
50. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
51. Lin, K., & Lu, H. (2010). Why people use social network sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1152-1161.
52. Ling, R. (2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Ling, R., & Campbell, S. W. (Eds.). (2010). The reconstruction of space and time: Mobile communication practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
54. Ling, R., Yttri, B., Andersen, B., & DiDuca, D. (2003). Mobile Communication and social capital in Europe. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self, and politics (pp. 359- 373). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
55. Lopez, M. H., & Kirby, E. (2003). Voter turnout among young women and men [Fact sheet]. College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
56. Lynch, M. (2006). Voices of the new Arab public: Iraq, Al-Jazeera, and Middle East politics today. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
57. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., Smith, A., & Beaton, M. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. 〈http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teens-Social-Media-And-Privacy/Main- Report/Part-1.aspx〉 Retrieved 21.05.13.
58. Panovich, K., Miller, R., & Karger, D. (2012, February). Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1057-1066). ACM.
59. Park, N., Kee, K., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 729-733.
60. Pasek, J., more, e., & Romer, D. (2009). Realizing the social Internet? Online social network meets office civic engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6, 197-215.
61. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1-24.
62. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Turning in, turning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS. Political Science & Politics, 28, 664-683.
63. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
64. Satyanarayanan, M. (2001). Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Personal Communications, 10-17.
65. Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145-168.
66. Scott, M. (October 12, 2013). 5 surprising social media statistics for 2013. 〈http:// socialmediatoday.com/docmarkting/1818611/five-surprising-social-media-statistics-2013〉 Retrieved 12.10.13.
67. Seongyi, Y., & Woo-Young, C. (2011). Political participation of teenagers in the information era. Social Science Computer Review, 29(2), 242-249.
68. Shah, D., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. (2001). Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
69. Shah, D., Rojas, H., & Cho, J. (2009). Media and civic participation: On understanding and misunderstanding communication effects. In J. Bryant & M. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 207-227). New York, NY: Routledge.
70. Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (2), 330-348.
71. Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of the Fourth Communities and Technologies Conference, 245-254.
72. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online SNSs: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434-445.
73. Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1102-1112.
74. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won't assimilate? Information, Communication & Society, 11 (4), 544-564.
75. Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363-379.
76. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. (2009). Is there social capital in a SNS? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875-901.
77. Van Dijk, J. A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4), 221-235.
78. Vangelisti, A. L. (2002). Interpersonal processes in romantic relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 643-679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79. Vitak, J., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2011, January). Re-examining the relationship between Facebook use and bonding social capital: A focus on social provisions. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, HI.
80. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14, 107-114.
81. Wilson, R., Gosling, S., & Graham, L. (2013). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220.
82. Wohn, D., Ellison, N., Khan, M., Fewins-Bliss, R., & Gray, R. (2013). The role of social media in shaping first-generation high school students' college aspirations: A social capital lens. Computers & Education, 63, 424-436.
83. Wohn, D., Lampe, C., Vitak, J. & Ellison, N. (2011). Coordinating the ordinary: Social information uses of Facebook by adults. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual iConference. New York: ACM.
84. Young, K. (2011). Social ties, social networks and the Facebook experience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 9(1), 20-34.
85. Zuniga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319-336.