Users and nonusers: Interactions between levels of facebook adoption and social capital

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 809-819

  Lampe, Cliff ^a   Vitak, Jessica ^b   Ellison, Nicole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Facebook; Social capital; Social network sites; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

BONDING SOCIAL CAPITALS; COGNITIVE FACTORS; FACEBOOK; OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE; SOCIAL CAPITALS; SOCIAL NETWORK SITES; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; THREE DIMENSIONS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84874841252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441867     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Ackerman, M. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. in Carroll, J. ed. Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, ACM Press, New York, NY, 2001.
2. Backstrom, L., Bakshy, E., Kleinberg, J., Lento, T.M. and Rosenn, I., Center of Attention: How Facebook Users Allocate Attention Across Friends. in Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), (Barcelona, 2011).
3. Bagozzi, R.P. The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8 (4). 244-254.
4. Barkhuus, L. and Tashiro, J. Student socialization in the age of facebook Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010.
5. Brandtzaeg, P.B. Social networking sites: Their users and social implications-a longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17. 467-488.
6. Burke, M., Kraut, R. and Marlow, C. Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011, 571-580.
7. Burke, M., Marlow, C. and Lento, T., Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Technical Systems, (Boston, MA, 2009), ACM Press.
8. Burke, M., Marlow, C. and Lento, T. Social network activity and social well-being Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010.
9. Cheunga, C.M.K., Chiua, P.-Y. and Leeb, M.K.O. Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (4). 1337-1343.
10. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3). 319-340.
11. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5 (2).
12. Donath, J.S. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13 (1). 12.
13. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12 (4). article 1.
14. Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Gray, R., Lampe, C. and Brooks, B. Cultivating Social Resources on Facebook: Signals of Relational Investment and their Role in Social Capital Processes iCS-OII 2011 "A Decade in Internet Time" Symposium., Oxford, UK, 2011.
15. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. Connection Strategies: Social Capital Implications of Facebookenabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society, 13. 873-892.
16. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Boston, MA, USA, 2009.
17. Golder, S., Wilkinson, D. and Huberman, B.A., Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a Massive Online Network. in 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT2007). (East Lansing, MI, 2007), Springer.
18. Grudin, J. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37 (1). 93-104.
19. Grudin, J., Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces. in ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, (Portland, OR, 1988), ACM Press, 85-93.
20. Hampton, K., Sessions-Goulet, L., Marlow, C. and Rainie, L. Why most Facebook users get more than they give, Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC, 2012.
21. Hargittai, E. Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13 (1).
22. Johnson, T. and Perlmutter, D. The Facebook Election: New Media and the 2008 Election Campaign. Mass Communication and Society, 12 (3).
23. Joinson, A.N., Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM Press, 1027-1036.
24. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C., Changes in Use and Perception of Facebook. in ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), (San Diego, CA, 2008), ACM Press.
25. Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R. and Ellison, N., Perceptions of Facebook's Value as an Information Source in 30th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Austin, TX, 2012), ACM Press.
26. Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R. and Ellison, N., Perceptions of Facebook's Value as an Information Source. in CHI - Conference on Human Factors in Computing, (Austin, TX, 2012), ACM Press.
27. Lampe, C., Wohn, D.Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N.B. and Wash, R. Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning, 6 (3). 329-347.
28. LaRose, R. The Problem of Media Habits. Communication Theory, 20 (2). 194-222.
29. Larose, R., Mastro, D. and Eastin, M.S. Understanding Internet Usage. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (4). 395-413.
30. Madden, M. and Zickuhr, K. 65% of Online Adults Use Social Networking Sites, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2011.
31. Morris, M.R., Teevan, J. and Panovich, K. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010.
32. Panovich, K., Miller, R. and Karger, D. Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2012, 1057-1066.
33. Papacharissi, Z. and Mendelson, A. Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. in Papathanassopoulos, S. ed. Media perspectives for the 21st century, Routledge, New Tork, 2011, 212-230.
34. Putnam, R.D. Bowling Alone. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000.
35. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, 1995.
36. Rosenberg, M. Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT, 1989.
37. Selwyn, N. Faceworking: exploring students' educationrelated use of Facebook Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (2). 157-174.
38. Skeels, M.M. and Grudin, J. When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work, ACM, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2009.
39. Smith, A. Why Americans use social media, Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2011.
40. Smith, A. and Brenner, J. Twitter Use 2012, Pew Research Internet & American Life Project, Washington, D.C., 2012.
41. Smock, A.D., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C. and Wohn, D.Y. Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (6). 2322-2329.
42. Teevan, J., Morris, M.R. and Panovich, K., Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked via Social Network Status Messages. in ICWSM - International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (Barcelona, Spain, 2011).
43. Tufekci, Z. and Wilson, C. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62 (2). 363-379.
44. Valenzuela, S., Park, N. and Kee, K.F. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14. 875-901.
45. Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J. and Schouten, A.P. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9. 584-590.
46. Venkatash, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3). 425- 478.
47. Vitak, J. and Ellison, N. There's a network out there you might as well tap': Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. . New Media & Society.
48. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C.T., Ellison, N. and Lampe, C. It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14 (3). 107-114.
49. Williams, D. On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11 (2).
50. Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D. and Graham, L.T. A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences Perspectives on Psychological Science, in Press.