Social networking sites: Their users and social implications - A longitudinal study

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 467-488

  Brandtzæg, Petter Bae ^a  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

Face to face interactions; Loneliness; Social capital; Social networking sites; User types

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION; LONELINESS; SOCIAL CAPITALS; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; USER TYPE;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84863759731     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01580.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(4), 573-590.
2. Barkhuus, L., & Tashiro, J. (2010). Student socialization in the age of Facebook. In Proceedings of CHI, 133-142. New York: ACM Press.
3. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
4. Brandtzæg, P. B. (2010). Towards a unified media-user typology (MUT): A meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media-user typologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 940-956.
5. Brandtzæg, P. B., & Heim, J. (2011). A typology of social networking sites users. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(1), 28-51.
6. Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social implications of Internet and social networking sites: A user typology approach. Doctoral thesis submitted for the degree of PhD. University of Oslo.
7. Brandtzæg, P. B., & Lüders, M. (2009). Privacy 2.0: Privacy and consumer issues in the new media reality. SINTEF report on behalf of the Consumer Council, Oslo, Norway.
8. Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook "friends"? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11), 123-138.
9. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
11. Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71.
12. Dunbar, R.I.M. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4).
14. Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. New York: Polity Press.
15. Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2010). From dabblers to omnivores: A typology of social network site usage. In Z. Papacharissi, Ed.: A networked self. London: Routledge.
16. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 14.
17. Internet World Stats. (2010). Retrieved March 12, 2011 from
18. Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., & Reese, D. D. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 3.
19. Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 441-458.
20. Kraut, R. E., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1032.
21. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
22. Kaare, B. H., Brandtzæg, P. B., Endestad, T., & Heim, J. (2007). In the borderland between family orientation and peer-culture: The use of communication technologies among Norwegian tweens. New Media & Society, 9(4), 603-624.
23. Ling, R. (2005). The Socio-linguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. Telenor R&D. Retrieved June 24, 2011 from
24. Morris, J. (2010). Computer-mediated communication and the self. CURE, 1(1), 35-41. Retrieved February 20, 2011 from
25. New York Times. (2010, April 30). AntiSocial Networking. Retrieved January 14, 2011 from
26. NielsenWire. (2010, April 30). What Americans do online: Social media and games dominate activity. Retrieved October 1, 2011 from
27. Nie, N., & Hillygus, D. S. (2002). The impact of Internet use on sociability. Time-diary findings. IT and Society, 1(1), 1-29.
28. Norstat. (2010). Retrieved 12.12.2011 from
29. Pajak, K. (2006). A tool for measuring bridging social capital. Conference of the ESA Research Network for the Sociology of Culture and the Cultural Policy Research Centre Re-Creatief Vlaanderen Changing Cultures: European Perspectives, Ghent, 15-17/11/2006.
30. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
31. Russel, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472-480.
32. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445.
33. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 420-433.
34. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
35. Tillema, T., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2010). Face to face communications in maintaining social networks: The influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content. New Media & Society, 12(6), 965-983.
36. TNS Gallups (2010). Interbuss Q2 and Q3. Retrieved online 12.12.2010 from
37. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
38. Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet changing social life? It seems that the more things change the more they stay the same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195-205.
39. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
40. Van Dijck, J. D. (2009). Wikinomics and its discontents: A critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos. New Media & Society, 11(5), 855-874.
41. Wang, H., & Wellman, B. (2010). Social connectivity in America: Change in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1148-1169.
42. Wacquant, L.J.D., & Wilson, J. (1989). The cost of racial and class exclusion in the inner city. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501, 8-25.
43. Wellman, B., Quan Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Science, 45(3), 437-56.
44. Weiss, R. (1975). Loneliness: The experience of social and emotional isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.