Classifying market-based instruments for ecosystem services: A guide to the literature jungle

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 9, Issue , 2014, Pages 106-114

  Pirard, Romain ^a   Lapeyre, Renaud ^b  

^a Center for International Forestry Research CIFOR   (Indonesia)

^b SCIENCES PO   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Incentives; Market based instruments; Payments for environmental services; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908367146     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abell J.M., Hamilton D.P., Paterson J. Reducing the external environmental costs of pastoral farming in New Zealand: experiences from the Te Arawa lakes, Rotorua. Australasian J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 18(3):139-154.
2. Abildtrup J., Jensen F., Dubgaard A. Does the Coase theorem hold in real markets? An application to the negotiations between waterworks and farmers in Denmark. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 93:169-176.
3. Ahlheim M., Frör O. Drinking and Protecting: A Market Approach to the Preservation of Cork Oak Landscapes. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2011, 1(2):179-196.
4. Armsworth P.R., Chan K.M.A, Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R., Kremen C., Ricketts T.H., Sanjayan M.A. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation (editorial). Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21(6):1383-1384.
5. Bennett M.T., Mehta A., Xu J. Incomplete property rights, exposure to markets and the provision of environmental services in China. China Econ. Rev. 2011, 22(4):485-498.
6. Biggs B., Courchamp F., Martin R., Possingham H.P. Legal trade of Africa[U+05F3]s rhino horns. Science 2013, 339:1038-1039.
7. Cashore B., Auld G., Newsom D. Governing Through Markets 2004, Yale University Press, New Haven.
8. Coggan A., Whitten S.M., Reeson A., Shelton D. Case Studies of Market Based Instruments for Ecosystem Services. RIRDC Publication No. 08/194 2009, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton, Australia.
9. Corbera E., Kosoy N., Miguel Martínez T. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Glob. Environ. Change 2007, 17(3-4):365-380.
10. Ebeling J., Yasue M. Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2008, 363(1498):1917-1924.
11. EC, 2011. Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: an EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (COM(2011) 244). European Commission, Brussels.
12. Eigenraam M., Strappazzon L., Lansdell N., Beverly C., Stoneham G. Designing frameworks to deliver unknown information to support market-based instruments. Agric. Econ. 2007, 37:261-269.
13. Emerton L., Bishop J., Thomas L. Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas: A Global Review of Challenges and Options 2006, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, (X+97 pp.).
14. Farooqui M.F., Schultz M. Co-chairs[U+05F3] Summary of Dialogue Seminar on Scaling up Biodiversity Finance 2012, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.
15. Feng H., Kurkalova L., Secchi S., Gassman P.W. The conservation reserve program in the presence of a working land alternative: implications for environmental quality, program participation, and income transfer. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87(5):1231-1238.
16. Ferraro P.J., Uchida T., Conrad J.M. Price premiums for eco-friendly commodities: are 'Green' markets the best way to protect endangered ecosystems?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2005, 32(3):419-438.
17. Fletcher R., Breitling J. Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica. GeoForum 2012, 43:402-411.
18. Gordon A., Langford W.T., White M.D., Todd J.A., Bastin L. Modelling trade-offs between public and private conservation policies. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144(1):558-566.
19. Gustafsson B. Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24:259-274.
20. Gutman, P., Davidson, S., 2007. A Review of Innovative International Financial Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation with a Special Focus on the International Financing of Developing Countries[U+05F3] Protected Areas. World Wildlife Fund's Macroeconomics for Sustainable Development Program Office (WWF-MPO), Document UNEP/CBD/WG-PA/2/INF/8.
21. IEEP, The Use of Market-based Instruments for Biodiversity Protection - The Case of Habitat Banking. Technical report for the European Commission DG Environment, 2010, Economics for the Environment Consultancy (eftec), Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels.
22. Jack B.K., Kousky C., Sims K.R.E. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105(28):9465-9470.
23. Jeanneaux, P., Aznar, O., de Mareschal, S., 2012. Une analyse bibliométrique pour éclairer la mise à l'agenda scientifique des « services environnementaux, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement (Online), vol. 12 numéro 3.
24. Kirkby C.A., Giudice-Granado R., Day B., Turner K., Velarde-Andrade L.M., Duenas-Duenas A., Lara-Rivas J.C., Yu D.W. The market triumph of ecotourism: an economic investigation of the private and social benefits of competing land uses in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:9.
25. Landell-Mills N., Porras I. Silver bullet or fool's gold? A global review of markets for environmental services and their impacts for the poor 2002, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
26. Lapeyre R., Pirard R., Kleitz G. Resource Mobilisation for Aichi Targets: Ambiguous Lessons from Research on Market-based Instruments. IDDRI Policy Brief 15/12 2012, Institute for Sustainable development and International Relations (IDDRI), Paris, (6 pp.).
27. Lapeyre R., Pirard R. Payments for environmental services and market-based instruments: next of kin or false friends? IDDRI Working Paper 14/13 2013, Institute for Sustainable development and International Relations (IDDRI), Paris, (16 pp.).
28. Lourival R., de Queiroz Caleman S.M., Martins Villar G.I., Ribeiro A.R., Elkin C. Getting fourteen for the price of one! Understanding the factors that influence land value and how they affect biodiversity conservation in central Brazil. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 67(1):20-31.
29. Lowell K., Drohan J., Haiek C., Beverly C., Lee M. A science-driven market-based instrument for determining the cost of environmental services: a comparison of two catchments in Australia. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64(1):61-69.
30. Lybbert T.J., Barrett C.B., Narjisse H. Market-based conservation and local benefits: the case of argan oil in Morocco. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(1):125-144.
31. Lybbert T.J., Aboudrare A., Chaloud D., Magnan N., Nash M. Booming markets for Moroccan argan oil appear to benefit some rural households while threatening the endemic argan forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108(34):13963-13968.
32. MacMillan D.C., Phillip S. Can economic incentives resolve conservation conflict: the case of wild deer management and habitat conservation in the Scottish Highlands. Hum. Ecol. 2010, 38(4):485-493.
33. Mattheiß V., Le Mat O., Strosser P. Which Role for Economic Instruments in the Management of Water Resources in Europe? In Search for Innovative Ideas for Application in the Netherlands. Report for the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management 2009, (unpublished).
34. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1202-1208.
35. OECD Scaling-up Finance Mechanisms for Biodiversity 2013, OECD Publishing. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Apris.
36. Pattanayak S.K., Wunder.S., Ferraro P.J. Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?. Revi. Environ. Econ. Policy 2010, 4(2):254-274.
37. Pawliczek J., Sullivan S. Conservation and concealment in SpeciesBanking.com, USA: an analysis of neoliberal performance in the species offsetting industry. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38(4):435-444.
38. Perfecto I., Vandermeer J., Mas A., Pinto L.S. Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54(4):435-446.
39. Pesche, D., 2013. Emergence and Scope of Market-based Instruments in Scientific Literature: Some Bibliometrics Elements. INVALUABLE Project Working Paper, April 2013 (Unpublished).
40. Pirard R. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19-20:59-68.
41. Pirard R., Dooley K., Pistorius T. Defining market-based approaches for REDD+. IDDRI Policy Brief No. 16/12 2012, Institute for Sustainable development and International Relations (IDDRI), Paris, (5 pp.).
42. Reeson A.F., Rodriguez L.C., Whitten S.M., Williams K., Nolles K., Windle J., Rolfe J. Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70(9):1621-1627.
43. Instrument Mixes for Biodiversity Policies. POLICYMIX Report 2011, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, (Issue No. 2/2011). I. Ring, C. Schröte-Schlaack (Eds.).
44. Robertson M.M. Emerging ecosystem service markets: trends in a decade of entrepreneurial wetland banking. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4(6):297-302.
45. Robertson M.M. The work of wetland credit markets: two cases in entrepreneurial wetland banking. Wetl. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 17(1):35-51.
46. Robertson M.M., Hayden N. Evaluation of a market in wetland credits: entrepreneurial wetland banking in Chicago. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 2(3):636-646.
47. Rolfe J., Windle J. Using auction mechanisms to reveal costs for water quality improvements in Great Barrier Reef catchments in Australia. Agric. Water Manage. 2011, 98(4):493-501.
48. Ruhl J.B., Kraft S.E., Lant C.L. The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services 2007, Island Press, Washington D.C.
49. Salzman J. Creating markets for ecosystem services: notes from the field. N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 2005, 80(6):870-962.
50. Sanchez-Azofeifa G.A., Pfaff A., Robalino J.A., Boomhower J.P. Costa Rica[U+05F3]s payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation and impact. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21(5):1165-1173.
51. Seidl I., Schelske O., Joshi J., Jenny M. Entrepreneurship in biodiversity conservation and regional development. Entrepr. Reg. Dev. 2003, 15(4):333-350.
52. TEEB, 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers - Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature, United Nations Environment Programme.
53. UNCED, 1992. Rio declaration on environment and development. In: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro.
54. Van Hecken G., Bastiaensen J. Payments for ecosystem services in Nicaragua: do market-based approaches work?. Dev. Change 2010, 41(3):421-444.
55. Vatn A., Barton N.D., Lindhjem H., Movik S., Ring I., Santos R. Can Markets Protect Biodiversity? An Evaluation of Different Financial Mechanisms 2011, (Noragric Report No. 60), International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB).
56. Walsh MJ. Maximizing financial support for biodiversity in the emerging Kyoto protocol markets. Sci. Total Environ. 1999, 240(1-3):145-156.
57. Wissel S., Wätzold F. A conceptual analysis of the application of tradable permits to biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24(2):404-411.
58. Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42. Center for International Forestry Research, Indonesia.
59. Wunder, S., Vargas, M.T., 2005. Beyond 'markets': Why terminology matters (Guest Editorial). The Ecosystem Marketplace, Katoomba Group.