Designing frameworks to deliver unknown information to support market-based instruments

Agricultural Economics

Volumn 37, Issue S1, 2007, Pages 261-269

  Eigenraam, Mark ^a   Strappazzon, Loris ^a   Lansdell, Nicola ^a   Beverly, Craig ^a   Stoneham, Gary ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auction; Biodiversity; Carbon; EcoTender; Multiple environmental outcomes; Salinity; Water quality

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON; CATCHMENT; DESIGN; LAND USE PLANNING; MARKET; SALINITY; WATER QUALITY;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

EID: 37349113863     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: 15740862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00250.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Babcock, B., P. Lakshminarayan, J. Wu, and D. Zilberman Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities Land Economics 73 (1997 325 339.
2. Beverly, C., M. Bari, B. Christy, M. Hocking, and K. Smettem Predicted Salinity Impacts from Land Use Change: Comparison between Rapid Assessment Approaches and Detailed Modelling Framework Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45 (2005 1453 1469.
3. Department of Sustainability and Envirnment (DSE), Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual - Guidelines for applying the habitat hectares scoring method. Version 1.3 (Victorian Government: East Melbourne, 2004).
4. Eigenraam, M., L. Strappazzon, N. Lansdell, A. Ha, C. Beverly, and J. Todd EcoTender: Auction for Multiple Environmental Outcomes. National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality National Market Based Instruments Pilot Program. Project Final Report (2006).
5. Grafton, Q. Evaluation of Round One of the Market Based Instrument Pilot Program National Market Based Instruments Working Group (2005).
6. Griffin, R., and D. Bromley Agricultural Runoff as a Non-point Externality: A Theoretical Development American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1982 668 677.
7. Just, R., and J. Antle Interactions Between Agricultural and Environmental Policies: A Conceptual Framework American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 80 (1990 197 202.
8. McDonald, M. C., and A. W. Harbaugh MODFLOW, A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Ground-Water Flow Model Chapter A1 Open-file report 83-875 (US Geological Survey: Washington, DC, 1988).
9. Natural Resources and Environment (NRE), Victoria's Native Vegetation Management: A Framework for Action (The State of Victoria, Department of NRE: East Melbourne, 2002).
10. NMBIWG National Market-based Instruments Pilot Program: Round 1 An Interim Report (National Market Based Instrument Working Group, December, 2005) http://www.napswq.gov.au/mbi/pubs/interim-report.pdf.
11. Parkes, D., G. Newell, and D. Cheal Assessing the Quality of Native Vegetation: The 'Habitat Hectares' Approach Ecological Management and Restoration 4 (2003 S29 S38.
12. Shortle, J., and J. Dunn The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Polcies American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986 668 677.
13. Stoneham, G., V. Chaudhri, A. Ha, and L. Strappazzon Auctions for Conservation Contracts: An Empirical Examination of Victoria's Bush Tender Trial Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47 (2003 477 500.
14. Strappazzon, L., A. Ha, M. Eigenraam, C. Duke, and G. Stoneham The Efficiency of Alternative Property Right Allocations When Farmers Produce Multiple Environmental Goods under the Condition of Economies of Scope Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47 (2003 1 27.
15. Wu, J., and W. G. Boggess The Optimal Allocation of Conservation Funds Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38 (1999 302 321.
16. Wu, J. W., and K. Skelton-Groth Targeting Conservation Efforts in the Presence of Threshold Effects and Ecosystem Linkages Ecological Economics 42 (2002 313 331.