Does the Coase theorem hold in real markets? An application to the negotiations between waterworks and farmers in Denmark

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 169-176

  Abildtrup, Jens ^a   Jensen, Frank ^b   Dubgaard, Alex ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Coase theorem; Farmers; Negotiations; Waterworks

Indexed keywords

GROUND WATER;

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CULTIVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; MARKET SYSTEM; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; TRANSACTION COST; VULNERABILITY; WATER ECONOMICS; WATER PLANNING; WATER QUALITY;

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ARTICLE; COASE THEOREM; CONTRACT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DENMARK; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

DENMARK;

EID: 80053441535     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderhub V., Gächter S., Königstein M. Efficient contracting and fair play in a simple principal-agent experiment. Exp. Econ. 1999, 5:5-27.
2. Anderson T.L. Donning Coase-coloured glasses: a property rights view of natural resource economics. Aust. J. Agr. Resour. Ec 2004, 48:445-462.
3. Anderson T.L., Libecap G.D. Forging a new environmental and resource economics paradigm: The contractual bases for exchange 2005, Working paper, University of Arizona., Available at:, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www.u.arizona.edu/%7elibecapg/downloads/ForgingNewEnviron.pdf.
4. Barraque B., Viavattene C. Eau des villes et eau des champs. Vers des accords coopératifs entre services publics et agriculteurs?. Économie rurale 2009, 310:5-10.
5. Governance of Water-related Conflicts in Agriculture: New Direction in Agri-environmental Water Policies in the EU. Environment & Policy Series 2003, vol.37. Kluwer Academic Publishers. F. Brouwer, I. Heinz, T. Zabel (Eds.).
6. Carraro C., Lévêque F. Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy 1999, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
7. Cheung S.N.S. The fable of the bees: an economic investigation. J. Law Econ. 1973, 16:11-33.
8. Coase R.C. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 1960, 3:1-44.
9. COWI Environmental Factors and Health. The Danish Experience 2001, Miljøstyrelsen, Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Available at:, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/2001/87-7944-519-5/pdf/87-7944-518-7.pdf.
10. The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Issues. Environment & Policy 2005, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. E. Croci (Ed.).
11. DANVA Vand i tal. DANVA's Benchmarking og Vandstatistik 2007, DANVA, Dansk Vand- og Spildevandsforening, Available at:, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www.danva.dk/Default.aspx%3fID%3d219%26TokenExist%3dno.
12. Déprés C., Grolleau G., Mzoughi N. Contracting for environmental property rights: the case of Vittel. Economica 2008, 75:412-434.
13. Dubgaard A., Mortensen L.O. Dyrkningsaftaler og kompensationer. Jordrentetab ved bortfald af pesticider og reduceret kvælstofanvendelse 2000, FVD, Institut for Oekonomi, Skov og Landskab. KVL, Available at:, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www.fvd.dk/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx%3fFile%3d%252fFiles%252fFiler%252f1FVD_Filer%252fVejledninger%252f174_-_Dyrkningsaftaler_og_kompensationer-KVL-rappo.pdf.
14. Ellickson R.C. Of Coase and cattle: dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Rev. 1986, 38:623-687.
15. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:663-674.
16. Farley J., Costanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:2060-2068.
17. Ferraro P.J. Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:810-821.
18. Glachant M. Non-binding voluntary agreements. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2007, 54:32-48.
19. Hanley N., Summer C. Bargaining over common property resources: applying the Coase theorem to red deer in the Scottish Highlands. J. Environ. Manage. 1993, 43:87-95.
20. Hanley N., Shogren J.F., Whie B. Environmental Economics. Theory and Practice 1997, Macmillan, London.
21. Hansen L.G. Environmental regulation through voluntary agreements. Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy 1999, 27-54. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht. C. Carraro, F. Lévêque (Eds.).
22. Harrison G., McKee M. Experimental evaluation of the Coase theorem. J. Law Econ. 1985, 28:653-670.
23. Hasler B., Lundhede T., Martinsen L. Protection versus purification - assessing the benefits of drinking water quality. Hydrol. Res. 2007, 38:373-386.
24. Heinz I. Co-operative agreements and the EU water framework Directive in conjunction with the common agricultural policy. Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sc 2008, 12:715-726.
25. Hoffman E., Spitzer M. The Coase theorem: some experimental tests. J. Law Econ. 1982, 25:73-98.
26. Hoffman E., Spitzer M. Experimental Tests of the Coase theorem with large bargaining groups. J. Leg. Stud. 1986, 15:149-171.
27. Kemkes R.J., Farley J., Koliba C.J. Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:2069-2074.
28. Kristensen L.H. Varige dyrkningsdeklarationer, frivillige aftaler og ekspropriation: Erfaringer fra Aalborg, ATV Jord og Grundvand. Praktiske erfaringer med indsatser til grundvandsbeskyttelse - de første 10 år. Odense 21. maj 2008 2008, Available at ATV, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www.atv-jord-grundvand.dk/Afholdte_moeder/080521/LiseH%25C3%25B8jmoseKristensen.pdf.
29. Dansk Landbrug Vejledning til dyrkningsaftaler. Dansk Landbrug 2001, Available at Landbrugsinfo, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www.landbrugsinfo.dk/Planteavl/Filer/vejl_dyrkn_aftale.pdf.
30. Lyon T.P., Maxwell J.W. " Voluntary" approaches to environmental regulation: a survey. Economic Institutions and Environmental Policy 2002, 142-174. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot, Hampshire. M. Franzini, A. Nicita (Eds.).
31. Miljøministeriet Lov om ændring af lov om vandforsyning m.v., lov om miljøbeskyttelse og lov om planlægning. Act no. 479 of 01/07/1998 1998, Miljøministeriet, Copenhagen.
32. Miljøstyrelsen Drikkevandsudvalgets betænkning. Betænkning fra Miljøstyrelsen nr. 1. Miljø- og Energiministeriet 1998, Available at:, MST(accessed 05.11.11.). http://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/1998/87-7810-942-6/pdf/87-7810-942-6.pdf.
33. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy K., May P.H. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1202-1208.
34. Nijkamp P., Oltmer K. The regional self-Organizing potential in Sustainable agriculture 2004, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2004-116/3.
35. Noe E., Nielsen A.H., Thorup H.S., Bliksted T. Frivillige dyrkningsaftaler i indsatsområder Grundlag og muligheder belyst ud fra kvælstofproblematikken. Miljøprojekt no. 812 2003, Available at MST, Miljøstyrelsen, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2003/87-7972-680-1/pdf/87-7972-682-8.pdf.
36. OECD Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy. Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Usage in Policy Mixes 2003, OECD, Paris.
37. Periot-Maitre D., Davis P. Case Studies of Markets and Innovative Financial Mechanisms for Water Services from Forests 2001, Available at Forest Trends, (accessed 05.11.11.). http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_134.pdf.
38. Pigou A.C. The Economics of Welfare 1920, Macmillan and Co, London.
39. Salzman J. Creating markets for ecosystem services: notes from the field. New York U. Law Rev. 2005, 80:800-961.
40. Shogren J. An experiment on Coasian bargaining over ex ante lotteries and ex post rewards. J. Econ. Behav. Organ 1992, 17:153-169.
41. Shogren J., Kask S. Exploring the boundaries of the Coase theorem: efficiency and rationality given imperfect contract enforcement. Econ. Lett. 1992, 39:155-161.
42. Slonim R., Roth A.L. Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: an experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica 1998, 66:569-596.
43. Stigler G.J. The Theory of Price 1966, The Macmillan Company, New York. third ed.
44. Vangsgaard C. Personal Communication 2010, Consultant at DANVA.
45. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1245-1252.
46. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting 1985, The Free Press, New York.
47. Williamson O.E. The economics of governance. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005, 95:1-18.
48. Wu J., Babcock B.A. Contract design for the purchase of environmental goods from agriculture. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 1996, 78:935-945.
49. Wunder S. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts, Occasional Paper No. 42 2005, Center for International Forestry Research, Nairobi, Kenya.