Maximizing financial support for biodiversity in the emerging Kyoto Protocol markets

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 240, Issue 1-3, 1999, Pages 145-156

  Walsh, Michael J ^a  

^a LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural soils; Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; Climate change; Convention on biological diversity; Emissions trading; Kyoto protocol; Reforestation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL PROVISION; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MARKET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL;

EID: 0032882427     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00313-7     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Brown P., Kete N., Livernash R. Forest and land use projects. Goldemberg J. Issues & options: the clean development mechanism. 1998;United Nations Development Programme, New York.
2. Conservation Technology Information Center. Benefits of High-Residue Farming. West Lafayette, IN: 1998.
3. Fearnside P. Global warming response options in Brazil's forest sector: comparison of project-level cost and benefits. Biomass Energy. 8(5):1995;309-322.
4. International Energy Agency. Energy Environment Update, No.6, Autumn 1997, Paris.
5. Lal R., Kimble J.M., Follett R.F., Cole C.V. The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. 1998;Sleeping Bear Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
6. Reiber D. Climate change may promote alien species. EarthNews, Nov. 4, 1998.
7. Sandor R, Skees J. Creating a market for carbon emissions: opportunities for US farmers. Choices 1999:forthcoming.
8. Sandor RL, Walsh MJ. Market architecture, quality control and performance risk: can the commodity and capital markets inform the design of the clean development mechanism? US/Brazil Aspen Forum on the Clean Development Mechanism, 1998.
9. Schmalensee R., Joskow P., Ellerman A., Montero J., Bailey E. An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading. J Econ Perspect. 12(3):1998;53-68.
10. US Department of State. Biodiversity and the convention on biological diversity. Fact Sheet released by the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs. November 16, 1998.
11. Walsh M. Potential for derivative instruments on sulfur dioxide emission reduction credits. Derivatives Q. 1(1):1994;1-8.
12. World Resources Institute. Climate, biodiversity, and forests: issues and opportunities emerging from the Kyoto protocol. Washington, D.C. 1998.