Payments for ecosystem services in Nicaragua: Do market-based approaches work?

Development and Change

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 421-444

  Van Hecken, Gert ^a   Bastiaensen, Johan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE;

NICARAGUA;

EID: 77955045196     PISSN: 0012155X     EISSN: 14677660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01644.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agrawal A. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects 2005, Durham, NC, and, London, Duke University Press
2. Angelsen A, Kaimowitz D. Rethinking the Causes of Deforestation: Lessons from Economic Models. World Bank Research Observer 1999, 14(1):73-98.
3. Bastiaensen J, D'Exelle B, Famerée C. Political Arenas around Access to Land: A Diagnosis of Property Rights Practices in the Nicaraguan Interior. 2006, Antwerp, Institute of Development Policy and Management
4. Baumeister E, Fernandez E. Análisis de la tenencia de la tierra en Nicaragua a partir del censo agropecuario 2001 (Analysis of Land Tenure in Nicaragua based on the 2001 Agricultural Census) 2005, Managua, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Forestry; National Institute of Statistics and Censuses and United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization
5. Cleaver F. Reinventing Institutions and the Social Embeddedness of Natural Resource Management. European Journal of Development Research 2002, 14(2):11-30.
6. Coase RH. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 1960, 3:1-44.
7. Costanza R. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-60.
8. Dagang ABK, Nair PKR. Silvopastoral Research and Adoption in Central America: Recent Findings and Recommendations for Future Directions. Agroforestry Systems 2003, 59:149-55.
9. Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:663-75.
10. Ferraro PJ, Simpson RD. The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservation Payments. Land Economics 2002, 78(3):339-53.
11. Frey BS. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation 1997, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
12. Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F. The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. American Economic Review 1997, 87:746-55.
13. Frey BS, Stutzer A. Environmental Morale and Motivation. 2006, Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics
14. Geist H, Lambin E. Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation. Bioscience 2002, 52(2):143-50.
15. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research 1967, New York, Aldine De Gruyter
16. de Haan L, Zoomers A. Exploring the Frontier of Livelihood Research. Development and Change 2005, 36(1):27-47.
17. Heyman J, Ariely D. Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets. Psychological Science 2004, 15(11):787-93.
18. Jordan A, Wurtzel R, Zito AR. "New" Environmental Policy Instruments: An Evolution or a Revolution in Environmental Policy. Environmental Politics 2003, 12:201-24.
19. Kaimowitz D, Angelsen A. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review 1998, Bogor, Center for International Forestry Research
20. Landell-Mills N, Porras I. Silver Bullet or Fools' Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Impact on the Poor 2002, London, International Institute for Environment and Development
21. Lepper MR, Greene D. The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation 1978, eds, Hillsdale, NY, Erlbaum
22. Levard L, Lopez YM, Navarro I. Municipio de Matiguás: Potencialidades y Limitantes del Desarrollo Agropecuario (Municipality of Matiguás: Opportunities and Limitations of Agricultural Development) 2001, Managua, UCA, /FIDA/Nitlapán
23. Maldidier C, Marchetti R. El Campesino-Finquero y el Potencial Económico del Campesinado Nicaragüense (The Finquero Peasant and the Economic Potential of the Peasantry) 1996, Managua, Nitlapán
24. McAfee K. Selling Nature to Save it? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 1999, 17(2):133-54.
25. McAfee K, Shapiro EN. Payment for Environmental Services in Mexico: Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State. 2008, San Francisco, CA, 26 March
26. McCarthy J, Prudham S. Neoliberal Nature and the Nature of Neoliberalism. Geoforum 2004, 35:275-84.
27. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), Washington, DC, Island Press
28. Ostrom E. The Puzzle of Counterproductive Property Rights Reforms: A Conceptual Analysis. Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action 2002, 129-50. de Janvry AGordillo GPlatteau JPSadoulet E. eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press
29. Pagiola S, Bishop J, Landell-Mills N. Selling Forest Environmental Services. Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development 2002, eds, London, Earthscan
30. Pagiola S. Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes. 2004, Washington, DC, The World Bank
31. Pagiola S, Arcenas A, Platais G. Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America. World Development 2005, 33(2):237-53.
32. Pagiola S. Paying for the Environmental Services of Silvopastoral Practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics 2007, 64:374-85.
33. Pagiola S, Rios AR, Arcenas A. Can the Poor Participate in Payments for Environmental Services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua. Environment and Development Economics 2008, 13(3):299-325.
34. Pattanayak SK, Mercer DE, Sills E, Yang J-C. Taking Stock of Agroforestry Adoption Studies. Agroforestry Systems 2003, 57:173-86.
35. Pearce D. Environmental Market Creation: Saviour or Oversell. Portuguese Economic Journal 2004, 3(2):115-44.
36. Pearce D, Turner R. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment 1990, New York and London, Harvester
37. Perman R, Ma Y, McGilvray J, Common M. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics 1999, 2nd edn, Harlow, Longman
38. Ravnborg HM, Damsgaard MG, Raben K. Payments for Ecosystem Services. Issues and Pro-Poor Opportunities for Development Assistance. 2007, Copenhagen, Danish Institute for International Studies
39. Reeson A. Institutions, Motivations and Public Goods: Theory, Evidence and Implications for Environmental Policy. 2008, Canberra, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (Australia)
40. Reeson A, Tisdell J. When Good Incentives Go Bad: An Experimental Study of Institutions, Motivations and Crowding Out. 2006, Sydney, 8-10 February
41. Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data 2005, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
42. Salzman J. Creating Markets for Ecosystem Services: Notes from the Field. New York University Law Review 2005, 80:870-961.
43. Vaessen J, Van Hecken G. Assessing the Potential for Experimental Evaluation of Intervention Effects: The Case of the Regional Integrated Silvopastoral Approaches to Ecosystem Management Project (RISEMP). 2009, Washington, DC, World Bank, Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office
44. Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J. The Potential and Limitations of Markets and Payments for Ecosystem Services in Protecting the Environment: Critical Reflections Inspired by an Assessment of the RISEMP Program in Matiguás-Río Blanco, Nicaragua. 2009, Antwerp, Institute of Development Policy and Management
45. Vatn A. Rationality, Institutions and Environmental Policy. Ecological Economics 2005, 55:203-17.
46. Wells MP. Institutions and Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 1998, 7:815-35.
47. Colombia, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua Regional Integrated Silvopastoral Approaches to Ecosystem Management Project: Project Appraisal Document. 2002, World Bank, Washington, DC, The World Bank
48. Wunder S. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. 2005, Jakarta, Center for International Forestry Research
49. Wunder S, Vargas MT. Beyond "Markets": Why Terminology Matters. The Tale of Two Continents - Ecosystem Services in Latin America and East and Southern Africa 2005, 27-31. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com, Bayon R, Nathaniel CHawn A. eds, Ecosystem Marketplace
50. Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. Taking Stock: A Comparative Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services Programs in Developed and Developing Countries. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:834-52.
51. Young M, Shi T, Crosthwaite J. Duty of Care: An Instrument for Increasing the Effectiveness of Catchment Management. 2003, Melbourne, State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment