Phyllosphere microbiota composition and microbial community transplantation on lettuce plants grown indoors

mBio

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Williams, Thomas R ^a   Marco, Maria L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BETAPROTEOBACTERIA; CELL DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI O157; FOOD SAFETY; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; HABITAT; INCUBATION TIME; LETTUCE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROFLORA; NONHUMAN; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PLANT GROWTH; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PYROSEQUENCING; VALIDITY; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; FOOD CONTROL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAF;

LACTUCA;

BACTERIA; BETAPROTEOBACTERIA; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI O157; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; LETTUCE; MICROBIOTA; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAVES;

EID: 84908262674     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01564-14     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Morris CEK, Kinkel LL. 2002. Fifty years of phyllosphere microbiology: significant contributions to research in related fields, p 365-375. In Lindow SE, Hecht-Poinar EI, Elliott VJ (ed), Phyllosphere microbiology. APS Publishing, St. Paul, MN.
2. Knief C, Ramette A, Frances L, Alonso-Blanco C, Vorholt JA. 2010. Site and plant species are important determinants of the Methylobacterium community composition in the plant phyllosphere. ISME J 4:719-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.9.
3. Delmotte N, Knief C, Chaffron S, Innerebner G, Roschitzki B, Schlapbach R, von Mering C, Vorholt JA. 2009. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:16428-16433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905240106.
4. Kim M, Singh D, Lai-Hoe A, Go R, Abdul Rahim R, Ainuddin AN, Chun J, Adams JM. 2012. Distinctive phyllosphere bacterial communities in tropical trees. Microb. Ecol. 63:674-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9953-1.
5. Finkel OM, Burch AY, Lindow SE, Post AF, Belkin S. 2011. Geographical location determines the population structure in phyllosphere microbial communities of a salt-excreting desert tree. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:7647-7655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05565-11.
6. Ottesen AR, Pena AG, White JR, Pettengill JB, Li C, Allard S, Rideout S, Allard M, Hill T, Evans P, Strain E, Musser S, Knight R, Brown E. 2013. Baseline survey of the anatomical microbial ecology of an important food plant: Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). BMC Microbiol. 13:114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-114.
7. Ottesen AR, White JR, Skaltsas DN, Newell MJ, Walsh CS. 2009. Impact of organic and conventional management on the phyllosphere microbial ecology of an apple crop. J. Food Prot. 72:2321-2325.
8. Lopez-Velasco G, Carder PA, Welbaum GE, Ponder MA. 2013. Diversity of the spinach (Spinacia oleracea) spermosphere and phyllosphere bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 346:146-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12216.
9. Maignien L, Deforce EA, Chafee ME, Eren AM, Simmons SL. 2014. Ecological succession and stochastic variation in the assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana phyllosphere communities. mBio 5(1):e00682-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00682-13.
10. Rastogi G, Sbodio A, Tech JJ, Suslow TV, Coaker GL, Leveau JH. 2012. Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce. ISME J. 6:1812-1822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.32.
11. Redford AJ, Bowers RM, Knight R, Linhart Y, Fierer N. 2010. The ecology of the phyllosphere: geographic and phylogenetic variability in the distribution of bacteria on tree leaves. Environ. Microbiol. 12:2885-2893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02258.x.
12. Reisberg EE, Hildebrandt U, Riederer M, Hentschel U. 2013. Distinct phyllosphere bacterial communities on Arabidopsis wax mutant leaves. PLoS One 8:e78613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078613.
13. Williams TR, Moyne AL, Harris LJ, Marco ML. 2013. Season, irrigation, leaf age, and Escherichia coli inoculation influence the bacterial diversity in the lettuce phyllosphere. PLoS One 8:e68642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068642.
14. Knief C, Delmotte N, Chaffron S, Stark M, Innerebner G, Wassmann R, von Mering C, Vorholt JA. 2012. Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J. 6:1378-1390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.192.
15. Gourion B, Rossignol M, Vorholt JA. 2006. A proteomic study of Methylobacterium extorquens reveals a response regulator essential for epiphytic growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:13186-13191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603530103.
16. Okinaka Y, Yang CH, Perna NT, Keen NT. 2002. Microarray profiling of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937 genes that are regulated during plant infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 15:619-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.7.619.
17. Vorholt JA. 2012. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10:828-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2910.
18. Gourion B, Francez-Charlot A, Vorholt JA. 2008. PhyR is involved in the general stress response of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J. Bacteriol. 190:1027-1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.01483-07.
19. Zwielehner J, Handschur M, Michaelsen A, Irez S, Demel M, Denner EBM, Hasiberger AG. 2008. DGGE and real-time PCR analysis of lactic acid bacteria in bacterial communities of the phyllosphere of lettuce. Mol. Nutr. Foods Res. 52:614-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200700158.
20. Lindow SE, Brandl MT. 2003. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1875-1883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003.
21. Bunster L, Fokkema NJ, Schippers B. 1989. Effect of surface-active Pseudomonas spp. on leaf wettability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55: 1340-1345.
22. Schreiber L, Krimm U, Knoll D, Sayed M, Auling G, Kroppenstedt RM. 2005. Plant-microbe interactions: identification of epiphytic bacteria and their ability to alter leaf surface permeability. New Phytol. 166:589-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01343.x.
23. Marco ML, Legac J, Lindow SE. 2005. Pseudomonas syringae genes induced during colonization of leaf surfaces. Environ. Microbiol. 7:1379-1391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00825.x.
24. Innerebner G, Knief C, Vorholt JA. 2011. Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77: 3202-3210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00133-11.
25. Paternoster T, Défago G, Duffy B, Gessler C, Pertot I. 2010. Selection of a biocontrol agent based on a potential mechanism of action: degradation of nicotinic acid, a growth factor essential for Erwinia amylovora. Int. Microbiol. 13:195-206.
26. Wilson M, Lindow SE. 1993. Interactions between the biological-control agent Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 and Erwinia amylovora in pear blossoms. Phytopathology 83:117-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-83-117.
27. Teplitski M, Warriner K, Bartz J, Schneider KR. 2011. Untangling metabolic and communication networks: interactions of enterics with phytobacteria and their implications in produce safety. Trends Microbiol. 19:121-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2010.11.007.
28. Brandl MT. 2006. Fitness of human enteric pathogens on plants and implications for food safety. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 44:367-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143359.
29. Moyne AL, Harris LJ, Marco ML. 2013. Assessments of total and viable. Escherichia coli O157:H7 on field and laboratory grown lettuce. PLoS One 8:e70643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070643.
30. Reisberg EE, Hildebrandt U, Riederer M, Hentschel U. 2012. Phyllosphere bacterial communities of trichome-bearing and trichomeless Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 101:551-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10482-011-9669-8.
31. Schreiter S, Ding GC, Heuer H, Neumann G, Sandmann M, Grosch R, Kropf S, Smalla K. 2014. Effect of the soil type on the microbiome in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce. Front. Microbiol. 5:144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00144.
32. Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Schulze-Lefert P. 2013. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64:807-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106.
33. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11:789-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109.
34. Hunter PJ, Hand P, Pink D, Whipps JM, Bending GD. 2010. Both leaf properties and microbe-microbe interactions influence within-species variation in bacterial population diversity and structure in the lettuce (Lactuca species) phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:8117-8125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01321-10.
35. Kadivar H, Stapleton AE. 2003. Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity. Microb. Ecol. 45:353-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-1065-5.
36. Vokou D, Vareli K, Zarali E, Karamanoli K, Constantinidou HI, Monokrousos N, Halley JM, Sainis I. 2012. Exploring biodiversity in the bacterial community of the Mediterranean phyllosphere and its relationship with airborne bacteria. Microb. Ecol. 64:714-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0053-7.
37. Bezanson G, Delaquis P, Bach S, McKellar R, Topp E, Gill A, Blais B, Gilmour M. 2012. Comparative examination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival on Romaine lettuce and in soil at two independent experimental sites. J. Food Prot. 75:480-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-306.
38. Erickson MC, Webb CC, Diaz-Perez JC, Phatak SC, Silvoy JJ, Davey L, Payton AS, Liao J, Ma L, Doyle MP. 2010. Surface and internalized Escherichia coli O157:H7 on field-grown spinach and lettuce treated with spray-contaminated irrigation water. J. Food Prot. 73:1023-1029.
39. Islam M, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang XP. 2004. Persistence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and on leaf lettuce and parsley grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation water. J. Food Prot. 67:1365-1370.
40. Moyne AL, Sudarshana MR, Blessington T, Koike ST, Cahn MD, Harris LJ. 2011. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in field-inoculated lettuce. Food Microbiol. 28:1417-1425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.02.001.
41. Solomon EB, Pang HJ, Matthews KR. 2003. Persistence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on lettuce plants following spray irrigation with contaminated water. J. Food Prot. 66:2198-2202.
42. Erlacher A, Cardinale M, Grosch R, Grube M, Berg G. 2014. The impact of the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and its beneficial counterpart Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the indigenous lettuce microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 5:175. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00175.
43. McCann KS. 2000. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35012234.
44. Lopez-Velasco G, Tydings HA, Boyer RR, Falkinham JO, Ponder MA. 2012. Characterization of interactions between Escherichia coli O157:H7 with epiphytic bacteria in vitro and on spinach leaf surfaces. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 153: 351-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.026.
45. Barnett SJ, Roget DK, Ryder MH. 2006. Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 induced disease on wheat by the interaction between Pantoea, Exiguobacterium, and Microbacteria. Aust. J. Soil Res. 44:331-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SR05113.
46. Pereira P, Nesci A, Etcheverry MG. 2009. Efficacy of bacterial seed treatments for the control of Fusarium verticillioides in maize. BioControl 54:103-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9148-3.
47. Pedersen JC. 1992. Natamycin as a fungicide in agar media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:1064-1066.
48. Sakai M, Matsuka A, Komura T, Kanazawa S. 2004. Application of a new PCR primer for terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the bacterial communities in plant roots. J. Microbiol. Methods 59:81-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.06.005.
49. Rastogi G, Tech JJ, Coaker GL, Leveau JH. 2010. A PCR-based toolbox for the culture-independent quantification of total bacterial abundances in plant environments. J. Microbiol. Methods 83:127-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.08.006.
50. Triplett EW, Chelius MK. 2001. The diversity of archaea and bacteria in association with the roots of Zea mays L. Microb. Ecol. 41:252-263.
51. Lane D. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p 115-147. In Stackebrandt EGM (ed), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
52. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7:335-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303.
53. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460-2461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461.
54. Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R. 2010. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26:266-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636.
55. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490.
56. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM. 2009. The ribosomal Database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:141-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp353.
57. Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R. 2006. UniFrac—an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformatics 7:371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-371.