Corneal assessment technologies: Current status

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 599-614

  Rio Cristobal, Ana ^a,b   Martin, Raul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Confocal microscopy; Corneal morphology assessment; Dynamic applanation procedures; Optical coherence tomography (OCT); Orbscan topography; Placido disk; Scheimpflug imaging; Specular microscopy; Ultrasound pachymetry; Very high frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound biomicroscopy

Indexed keywords

ANALYZER; BIOMICROSCOPY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEA TOPOGRAPHER; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EYE EXAMINATION; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GALILEI DUAL SCHEIMPFLUG ANALYZER; HUMAN; KERATOSCOPY; OPHTHALMIC CAMERA; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SCHEIMPFLUG IMAGING; SLIT LAMP; SLIT SCANNING ELEVATION TOPOGRAPHY; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; ACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; KERATOMETRY; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84908211203     PISSN: 00396257     EISSN: 18793304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Acar B.T., Buttanri I.B., Sevim M.S., et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss in post-penetrating keratoplasty patients after cataract surgery: phacoemulsification versus planned extracapsular cataract extraction. JCataract Refract Surg 2011, 37:1512-1516.
2. Almubrad T.M., Osuagwu U.L., Alabbadi I., et al. Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter. Clin Ophthalmol 2011, 5:871-876.
3. Ambrósio R., Nogueira L.P., Caldas D.L., et al. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011, 51:11-38.
4. Bald M., Li Y., Huang D. Anterior chamber angle evaluation with fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. JOphthalmol 2012, 2012. 103704.
5. Baum G., Greenwood I. The application of ultrasonic locating techniques to ophthalmology. II. Ultrasonic slit-lamp in the ultrasonic visualization of soft tissues. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1958, 60:263-279.
6. Belin M.W., Khachikian S.S. An introduction to understanding elevation-based topography: how elevation data are displayed - a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009, 37:14-29.
7. Belin M.W., Khachikian S.S., McGhee C.N., et al. New technology in corneal imaging. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2010, 50:177-189.
8. Bohnke M., Masters B.R. Long term contact lens wear induces a corneal degeneration with micro-dot deposits in the corneal stroma. Ophthalmology 1997, 104:1887-1896.
9. Bourges J.L., Alfonsi N., Laliberté J.F., et al. Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas. Ophthalmology 2009, 116:2064-2071.
10. Bourne W.M. Corneal endothelium: past, present, and future. Eye Contact Lens 2010, 36:310-314.
11. Bourne W.M., McLaren J.W. Clinical responses of the corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res 2004, 78:561-572.
12. Brody J., Waller S., Wagoner M. Corneal topography: history, technique and clinical uses. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1994, 34:197-207.
13. Brooks A.M., Grant G., Gillies W.E. Specular microscopy in the identification of deep corneal opacities. Surv Ophthalmol 1992, 36:351-356.
14. Buehl W., Stojanac D., Sacu S., et al. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol 2006, 141:7-12.
15. Cairns G., McGhee C.N.J. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. JCataract Refract Surg 2005, 31:205-220.
16. Cavanagh H.D., El-Agha M.S., Petroll W.M., Jester J.V. Specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy: diagnostic tools of the past quarter century. Cornea 2000, 19:712-722.
17. Chakrabarti H.S., Craig J.P., Brahma A., et al. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. JCataract Refract Surg 2001, 27:1823-1828.
18. Cheng A., Rao A.K., Lau S., et al. Central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound, Orbscan II, and Visante OCT after LASIK for myopia. JRefrac Surg 2008, 24:361-365.
19. Chetoni P., Burgalassi S., Monti D., et al. Ocular toxicity of some corneal penetration enhancers evaluated by electrophysiology measurements on isolated rabbit corneas. Toxicol InVitro 2003, 17:497-504.
20. Courville C.B., Smolek M.K., Klyce S.D. Contribution of the ocular surface to visual optics. Exp Eye Res 2004, 78:417-425.
21. Cruzat A., Pavan-langston D., Hamrah P. Invivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves: analysis and clinical correlation. Semin Ophthalmol 2010, 25:171-177.
22. Daniels J.T., Harris A.R., Mason C. Corneal epithelial stem cells in health and disease. Stem Cell Rev 2006, 2:247-254.
23. Doors M., Berendschot T.T., de Brabander J., et al. Value of optical coherence tomography for anterior segment surgery. JCataract Refract Surg 2010, 36:1213-1229.
24. Doughty M.J., Jonuscheit S. The orbscan acoustic (correction) factor for central corneal thickness measures of normal human corneas. Eye Contact Lens 2010, 36:106-115.
25. Doughty M.J., Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000, 44:367-408.
26. Drews R.C. Fundus photography by electronic flash III. A new fundus-anterior segment camera. Am J Ophthalmol 1957, 44:522-525.
27. Drews R.C. Depth of field in slit image photography. An optical solution using the Scheimpflug principle. Ophthalmologica 1964, 148:143-150.
28. Dupps W.J., Qian Y., Meisler D.M. Multivariate model of refractive shift in Descemet-stripping automated endothe- lial keratoplasty. JCataract Refract Surg 2008, 34:578-584.
29. Efron N. Contact lens-induced changes in the anterior eye as observed invivo with the confocal microscope. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007, 26:398-436.
30. Efron N. The Glenn A. Fry award lecture 2010: Ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci 2011, 88:661-683.
31. Erie J.C., McLaren J.W., Patel S.V. Confocal microscopy in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol 2009, 148:639-646.
32. Flanagan J.G., Prokopich C.L. Indirect fundus biomicroscopy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995, 2:38-41.
33. Friedman D.S., He M. Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques. Surv Ophthalmol 2008, 53:250-273.
34. Gatinel D., Hoang-Xuan T. Measurement of combined corneal, internal, and total ocular optical quality analysis in anterior segment pathology with the OPD-scan and OPD-station. JRefract Surg 2006, 22:1014-1020.
35. González-Pérez J., González-Méijome J.M., Rodríguez Ares M.T., et al. Central corneal thickness measured with three optical devices and ultrasound pachometry. Eye Contact Lens 2011, 37:66-70.
36. Gualdi L., Cappello V., Giordano C. The use of NIDEK OPD Scan II wavefront aberrometry in toric intraocular lens implantation. JRefract Surg 2009, 25:110-115.
37. Gupta A.K., Krishna V. Corneal topography and wavefront sensing. Clinical Ophthalmology: Contemporary Perspectives 1993, 4-20. Elsevier India, Delhi, India. ed 1. A.K. Gupta, V. Krishna (Eds.).
38. Guthoff R.F., Zhivov A., Stachs O. Invivo confocal microscopy, an inner vision of the cornea - a major review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009, 37:100-117.
39. Ha B.J., Kim S.W., Kim S.W., et al. Pentacam and Orbscan II measurements of posterior corneal elevation before and after photorefractive keratectomy. JRefract Surg 2009, 25:290-295.
40. Hamilton K. Midperipheral corneal thickness affects noncontact tonometry. JGlaucoma 2009, 18:623-627.
41. Hara M., Morishige N., Chikama T., et al. Comparison of confocal biomicroscopy and non-contact specular microscopy for evaluation of the corneal endothelium. Cornea 2003, 22:512-515.
42. Hashemi H., Mehravaran S. Day to day clinically relevant corneal elevation, thickness, and curvature parameters using the orbscan II scanning slit topographer and the pentacam scheimpflug imaging device. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010, 17:44-55.
43. Hassell J.R., Birk D.E. The molecular basis of corneal transparency. Exp Eye Res 2010, 91:326-335.
44. Hodson S.A., Sherrard E.S. The specular microscope: its impact on laboratory and clinical studies of the cornea. Eye 1988, 2:81-97.
45. Hollingsworth J.G., Bonshek R.E., Efron N. Correlation of the appearance of the keratoconic cornea invivo by confocal microscopy and invitro by light microscopy. Cornea 2005, 24:397-405.
46. Holt M., Cogan D.G. The cornea; permeability of the excised cornea to ions, as determined by measurements of impedance. Arch Ophthal 1946, 35:292-298.
47. Ishikawa H., Liebmann J.M., Ritch R. Quantitative assessment of the anterior segment using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000, 11:133-139.
48. Izatt J.A., Hee M., Swanson E.A., et al. Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye invivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1994, 112:1584-1589.
49. Jain R., Grewal S. Pentacam: principle and clinical applications. Curr J Glaucoma Pract 2009, 3:20-32.
50. Jonuscheit S., Doughty M.J. Discrepancy between central and midperipheral corneal thickness measurements obtained with slit-scanning pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy. JCataract Refract Surg 2009, 35:2127-2135.
51. Jonuscheit S., Doughty M.J. Regional repeatability measures of corneal thickness: Orbscan II and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2007, 84:52-58.
52. Jonuscheit S., Doughty M.J., Button N.F. On the use of Orbscan II to assess the peripheral corneal thickness in humans: a comparison with ultrasound pachometry measures. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007, 27:179-189.
53. Jürgens I., Rosell J., Riu P.J. Electrical impedance tomography of the eye: invitro measurements of the cornea and the lens. Physiol Meas 1996, 17:187-195.
54. Kanellopoulos A.J., Aslanides I.M., Asimellis G. Correlation between epithelial thickness in normal corneas, untreated ectatic corneas, and ectatic corneas previously treated with CXL; is overall epithelial thickness a very early ectasia prognostic factor?. Clin Ophthalmol 2012, 6:789-800.
55. Kitzmann A.S., Winter E.J., Nau C.B., et al. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell images from a noncontact specular microscope and a scanning confocal microscope. Cornea 2005, 24:980-984.
56. Klais C.M., Bühren J., Kohnen T. Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy. Ophthalmologica 2003, 217:99-103.
57. Klyce S.D. Computer-assisted corneal topography. High-resolution graphic presentation and analysis of keratoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984, 25:1426-1435.
58. Knupp C., Pinali C., Lewis P.N., et al. The architecture of the cornea and structural basis of its transparency. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 2009, 78:25-49.
59. Konstantopoulos A., Hossain P., Anderson D.F. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis?. Br J Ophthalmol 2007, 91:551-557.
60. Kotecha A., Elsheikh A., Roberts C.R., et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006, 47:5337-5347.
61. Laganowski H.C., Sherrard E.S., Muir M.G., et al. Distinguishing features of the iridocorneal endothelial syndrome and posterior polymorphous dystrophy: value of endothelial specular microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol 1991, 75:212-216.
62. Leem H.S., Lee K.J., Shin K.C. Central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell changes caused by contact lens use in diabetic patients. Yonsei Med J 2011, 52:322-325.
63. Li Y., Shekhar R., Huang D. Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006, 113:792-799.
64. Li Y., Tang M., Zhang X., et al. Pachymetric mapping with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. JCataract Refract Surg 2010, 36:826-831.
65. Lim J.J., Fischbarg J. Electrical properties of rabbit corneal endothelium as determined from impedance measurements. Biophys J 1981, 36:677-695.
66. Liu Z., Pflugfelder S.C. The effects of long-term contact lens wear on corneal thickness, curvature, and surface regularity. Ophthalmology 2000, 107:105-111.
67. Luce D.A. Determining invivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. JCataract Refract Surg 2005, 31:156-162.
68. Martin R., Ortiz S., Rio-San Cristobal A. White-to-white corneal diameter differences in moderately and highly myopic eyes: partial coherence interferometry versus scanning-slit topography. JCataract Refract Surg 2013, 39:585-589.
69. Martin R., de Juan V., Rodríguez G., et al. Measurement of corneal swelling variations without removal of the contact lens during extended wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007, 48:3043-3050.
70. Martin R., de Juan V., Rodriguez G., et al. Contact lens-induced corneal peripheral swelling: Orbscan repeatability. Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86:340-349.
71. Martin R., Izquierdo M., Saber A. Investigation of posterior corneal curvature in CL-induced corneal swelling. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009, 32:288-293.
72. Martin R., Nuñez L., Sastre J., et al. Constancy of the Orbscan acoustic factor to detect contact lens-induced corneal swelling. Clin Exp Optom 2011, 94:352-360.
73. Martin R., Rachidi H. Stability of posterior corneal elevation one year after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Clin Exp Optom 2012, 95:177-186.
74. Martin R., Vecilla G. Exploración del polo anterior. Manual de Optometría 2010, 313-330. Editorial Médica Panamericana, Madrid, Spain. ed 1. R. Martin, G. Vecilla (Eds.).
75. Maurice D.M. Cellular membrane activity in the corneal endothelium of the intact eye. Experientia 1968, 24:1094-1095.
76. McCarey B.E., Edelhauser H.F., Lynn M.J. Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 2008, 27:1-16.
77. McLaren J.W., Nau C.B., Erie J.C., et al. Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods. Am J Ophthalmol 2004, 137:1011-1020.
78. Meinhardt B., Stachs O., Stave J., et al. Evaluation of biometric methods for measuring the anterior chamber depth in the non-contact mode. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006, 244:559-564.
79. Miller D., Greiner J.V. Corneal measurements and tests. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Clinical Practice 1994, 4-13. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA. ed 1. D.M. Albert, F.A. Jakobiec (Eds.).
80. Minsky M. Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope. Scanning 1998, 10:128-138.
81. Mundt G.H., Hughes W.F. Ultrasonics in ocular diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1956, 41:488-498.
82. Nemeth G., Hassan Z., Modis L., et al. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements conducted with Pentacam HR and IOL Master. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011, 42:144-147.
83. Niederer R.L., McGhee C.N.J. Clinical invivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010, 29:30-58.
84. Ogbuehi K.C., Osuagwu U.L. Repeatability and interobsever reproducibility of Artemis-2 high-frequency ultrasound in determination of human corneal thickness. Clin Ophthalmol 2012, 6:761-769.
85. Oliveira C.M., Ribeiro C., Franco S. Corneal imaging with slit-scanning and Scheimpflug imaging techniques. Clin Exp Optom 2011, 94:33-42.
86. Parmar D.N., Awwad S.T., Petroll W.M., et al. Tandem scanning confocal corneal microscopy in the diagnosis of suspected acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 2006, 113:538-547.
87. Patel D.V., McGhee C.N. Mapping the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in keratoconus by invivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006, 47:1348-1351.
88. Patel D.V., McGhee C.N. Contemporary invivo confocal microscopy of the living human cornea using white light and laser scanning techniques: a major review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007, 35:71-88.
89. Patel S., McLaren J., Hodge D., et al. Normal human keratocyte density and corneal thickness measurement by using confocal microscopy invivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001, 42:333-339.
90. Popper M., Morgado A.M., Quadrado M.J., et al. Corneal cell density measurement invivo by scanning slit confocal microscopy: method and validation. Ophthalmic Res 2004, 36:270-276.
91. Prospero Ponce C.M., Rocha K.M., Smith S.D., et al. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. JCataract Refract Surg 2009, 35:1055-1062.
92. Qazi Y., Wong G., Monson B., et al. Corneal transparency: genesis, maintenance and dysfunction. Brain Res Bull 2010, 81:198-210.
93. Ramos J.L.B., Li Y., Huang D. Clinical and research applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography-a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009, 37:81-89.
94. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J. Combined Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound-assisted transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and wavefront-guided treatment following multiple corneal refractive procedures. JCataract Refract Surg 2006, 32:1870-1876.
95. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. JRefract Surg 2009, 25:604-610.
96. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M. Improved effectiveness of transepithelial PTK versus topography-guided ablation for stromal irregularities masked by epithelial compensation. JRefract Surg 2013, 29:526-533.
97. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M. LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound. JRefract Surg 2011, 27:417-426.
98. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M., et al. Very high-frequency digital ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmic Ultrasonography 2012, 43-62. Elsevier, Philadelphia, USA. ed 1. A. Singh, B. Hayden (Eds.).
99. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M., et al. Epithelial thickness after hyperopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. JRefract Surg 2010, 26:555-564.
100. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M., et al. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. JRefract Surg 2008, 24:571-581.
101. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M., et al. Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner. JRefract Surg 2010, 26:646-659.
102. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M., et al. Stromal thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. JRefract Surg 2009, 25:776-786.
103. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Silverman R.H., et al. Correlation of anterior chamber angle and ciliary sulcus diameters with white-to-white corneal diameter in high myopes using artemis VHF digital ultrasound. JRefract Surg 2009, 25:185-194.
104. Reinstein D.Z., Couch D.G., Archer T. Direct residual stromal thickness measurement for assessing suitability for LASIK enhancement by Artemis 3D very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc scanning. JCataract Refract Surg 2006, 32:1884-1888.
105. Reinstein D.Z., Gobbe M., Archer T.J. Anterior segment biometry: a study and review of resolution and repeatability data. JRefract Surg 2012, 28:509-520.
106. Reinstein D.Z., Silverman R.H., Raevsky T., et al. Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. JRefract Surg 2000, 16:414-430.
107. Reinstein D.Z., Srivannaboon S., Archer T.J., et al. Probability model of the inaccuracy of residual stromal thickness prediction to reduce the risk of ectasia after LASIK part I: quantifying individual risk. JRefract Surg 2006, 22:851-860.
108. Rondeau M.J., Barcsay G., Silverman R.H., et al. Very high frequency ultrasound biometry of the anterior and posterior chamber diameter. JRefract Surg 2004, 20:454-464.
109. Rosales P., Marcos S. Pentacam Scheimpflug quantitative imaging of the crystalline lens and intraocular lens. JRefract Surg 2009, 25:421-428.
110. Rosas Salaroli C.H., Li Y., Zhang X., et al. Repeatability of laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness measurement by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. JCataract Refract Surg 2011, 37:649-654.
111. Seitz B., Behrens A., Langenbucher A. Corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1997, 8:8-24.
112. Shah S., Laiquzzaman M., Yeung I., et al. The use of the ocular response analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009, 32:123-128.
113. Somodi S., Hahnel C., Slowik C., et al. Confocal invivo microscopy and confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy in keratoconus. Ger J Ophthalmol 1996, 5:518-525.
114. Stefano V.S., Melo Junior L.A., Mallmann F., et al. Interchangeability between Placido disc and Scheimpflug system: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2010, 73:363-366.
115. Swartz T., Marten L., Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007, 18:325-333.
116. Tang M., Wang L., Koch D.D., et al. Intraocular lens power calculation after previous myopic laser vision correction based on corneal power measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. JCataract Refract Surg 2012, 38:589-594.
117. Uematsu M., Kumagami T., Kusano M., et al. Acute corneal epithelial change after instillation of benzalkonium chloride evaluated using a newly developed invivo corneal transepithelial electric resistance measurement method. Ophthalmic Res 2007, 39:308-314.
118. Ursea R., Feng M., Urs R., et al. Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles. JRefract Surg 2013, 29:36-41.
119. Wegener A., Laser-Junga H. Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug's principle: options and limitations - a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009, 37:144-154.
120. Wong A., Leung C.K., Weinreb R.N., et al. Quantitative assessment of lens opacities with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2009, 93:61-65.
121. Zhang Q., Jin W., Wang Q. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy. JCataract Refract Surg 2010, 36:941-946.