New technology in corneal imaging

International Ophthalmology Clinics

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 177-189

  Belin, Michael W ^a   Khachikian, Stephen S ^a   McGhee, Charles N J ^a   Patel, Dipika ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; KERATITIS; KERATOMETRY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; CORNEAL DISEASES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 77954648004     PISSN: 00208167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3181e20ac0     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Binder PS, Lindstrom RL, Stulting RD, et al. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:749-752.
2. Rao SN, Raviv T, Majmudar PA, et al. Role of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1642-1646.
3. Belin MW, Khachikian SS. New devices & clinical implications for measuring corneal thickness. Clin & Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:729-731.
4. Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, Luz A, et al. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and cornealvolume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1851-1859.
5. Ambrósio R Jr, Klyce SD, Wilson SE. Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:24-29.
6. Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and Scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:75-80.
7. Holladay JT, Hill WE, Steinmueller A. Corneal power measurements using scheimpflug imaging in eyes with prior corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25: 862-868.
8. Scorcia V, Matteoni S, Scorcia GB, et al. Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1651-1655.
9. Huang D, Li Y, Radhakrishnan S, et al. Corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. In: Schuman JS, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG, eds. Optical Coherence To-mography of Ocular Diseases. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc; 2004:663-673.
10. Fukuda S, Kawana K, Yasuno Y, et al. Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:882-889.
11. Wong HT, Lim MC, Sakata LM, et al. High-definition optical coherence tomography imaging of the iridocorneal angle of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:256-260.
12. Wang J, Thomas J, Cox I, et al. Noncontact measurements of central corneal epithelial and flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1812-1816.
13. Cheng AC, Ho T, Lau S, et al. Measurement of LASIK flap thickness with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:879-884.
14. Lim LS, Aung HT, Aung T, et al. Corneal imaging with anterior segment optical coherence tomography for lamellar keratoplasty procedures. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145:81-90.
15. Tu EY, Joslin CE, Sugar J, et al. The relative value of confocal microscopy and superficial corneal scrapings in the diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 2008;27: 764-772.
16. Patel DV, McGhee CN. Mapping of the normal human corneal sub-basal nerve plexus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:4485-4488.
17. Patel DV, McGhee CN. Mapping the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in keratoconus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 1348-1351.
18. Yokogawa H, Kobayashi A, Sugiyama K. Mapping of normal corneal K-structures by in vivo laser confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2008;27:879-883.
19. Zhivov A, Stachs O, Stave J, et al. In vivo three-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy of corneal surface and epithelium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:667-672.
20. Stachs O, Zhivov A, Kraak R, et al. In vivo three-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy of the epithelial nerve structure in the human cornea. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:569-575.
21. Patel DV, McGhee CN. In vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy confirms that the human corneal sub-basal nerve plexus is a highly dynamic structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3409-3412.
22. Mehra S, Tavakoli M, Kallinikos PA, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration after pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2608-2612.
23. Bertelmann E, Pleyer U, Rieck P. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss post-keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:766-770.
24. Bourne WM. One-year observation of transplanted human corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:673-679.
25. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:857-865.
26. Tavakoli M, Kallinikos PA, Efron N, et al. Corneal sensitivity is reduced and relates to the severity of neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1895-1897. (Pubitemid 47036377)
27. Linna TU, Vesaluoma MH, Perez-Santonja JJ, et al. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves. Investigative Ophthalmol Visual Sc. 2000;41:393-397.
28. Perez-Gomez I, Efron N. Change to corneal morphology after refractive surgery (myopic laser in situ keratomileusis) as viewed with a confocal microscope. Optometry Vision Sc. 2003;80:690-697.
29. Lee SJ, Kim JK, Seo KY, et al. Comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and sensitivity between LASIK and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:1009-1015.
30. Niederer RL, McGhee CNJ. Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Progress Retina Eye Res. 2009;1:30-58.