The effect of neighboring cells on the stiffness of cancerous and non-cancerous human mammary epithelial cells

New Journal of Physics

Volumn 16, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Guo, Xinyi ^a   Bonin, Keith ^a   Scarpinato, Karin ^b   Guthold, Martin ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOGRAPHIES; BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; CURVE FITTING; CYTOLOGY; DISEASES; ELASTIC MODULI; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MONOLAYERS; STIFFNESS;

CANCER PROGRESSION; CELL-CELL CONTACT; CELL-CELL INTERACTION; HUMAN MAMMARY EPITHELIAL CELLS; INDENTATION CURVE; MAMMARY EPITHELIAL CELLS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION;

CELLS;

EID: 84908069754     PISSN: 13672630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/105002     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Sadikovic B et al 2008 Cause and consequences of genetic and epigenetic alterations in human cancer Curr. Genomics 9 394-408
2. Ferlay J et al 2010 Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 Int. J. Cancer 127 2893-917
3. American Cancer Society 2013 Cancer Facts & Figures 2013 (Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society)
4. Suresh S 2007 Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells Acta Biomater. 3 11
5. Gupta G P and Massague J 2006 Cancer metastasis: building a framework Cell 127 679-95
6. Akiyama H et al 2009 Fabrication of complex three-dimensional tissue architectures using a magnetic force-based cell patterning technique Biomed. Microdevices 11 713-21
7. Bissell M J and Hines W C 2011 Why don't we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression Nat. Med. 17 320-9
8. Christofori G 2003 Changing neighbours, changing behaviour: cell adhesion molecule-mediated signalling during tumour progression EMBO J. 22 2318-23
9. Dalby M J et al 2007 The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder Nat. Mater. 6 997-1003
10. Agus D B et al 2013 A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells Sci. Rep. 3 1449
11. Guck J et al 2005 Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence Biophys. J. 88 3689-98
12. Remmerbach T W et al 2009 Oral cancer diagnosis by mechanical phenotyping Cancer Res. 69 1728-32
13. Suresh S 2007 Nanomedicine - elastic clues in cancer detection Nat. Nanotechnol. 2 748-9
14. Chaffer C L and Weinberg R A 2011 A perspective on cancer cell metastasis Science 331 1559-64
15. Carl P and Schillers H 2008 Elasticity measurement of living cells with an atomic force microscope: data acquisition and processing Pflugers Arch. 457 551-9
16. Cross S E et al 2007 Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients Nat. Nanotechnol. 2 780-3
17. Fuhrmann A et al 2011 AFM stiffness nanotomography of normal, metaplastic and dysplastic human esophageal cells Phys. Biol. 8 015007
18. Lekka M et al 1999 Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy Eur. Biophys. J. 28 312-6
19. Leporatti S et al 2006 Elasticity and adhesion of resting and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages FEBS Lett. 580 450-4
20. Li Q S et al 2008 AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374 609-13
21. Plodinec M et al 2012 The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 757-65
22. Rebelo L M et al 2013 Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy Nanotechnol. 24 055102
23. Rotsch C and Radmacher M 2000 Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study Biophys. J. 78 520-35
24. Faria E C et al 2008 Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM Analyst 133 1498-500
25. Ward K A et al 1991 Viscoelastic properties of transformed-cells - role in tumor-cell progression and metastasis formation Biorheology 28 301-13
26. Vassy J et al 2003 Weightlessness acts on human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 Adv. Space Res. 32 1595-603
27. Berdyyeva T K, Woodworth C D and Sokolov I 2005 Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: direct measurements Phys. Med. Biol. 50 81-92
28. Strobl J S, Nikkhah M and Agah M 2010 Actions of the anti-cancer drug suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) on human breast cancer cytoarchitecture in silicon microstructures Biomaterials 31 7043-50
29. Sharma S et al 2014 The role of Rho GTPase in cell stiffness and cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells Integr. Biol. 6 611-7
30. Markert C D et al 2013 Characterizing the micro-scale elastic modulus of hydrogels for use in regenerative medicine J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 27 115-27
31. Elenbaas B et al 2001 Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells Genes Dev. 15 50-65
32. Lekka M et al 2012 Cancer cell recognition - mechanical phenotype Micron 43 1259-66
33. Lekka M et al 1999 Local elastic properties of cells studied by SFM Appl. Surf. Sci. 141 345-9
34. Valderrama F, Thevapala S and Ridley A J 2012 Radixin regulates cell migration and cell-cell adhesion through Rac1 J. Cell Sci. 125 3310-9
35. Timoshenko S P and Goodier J N 1970 Theory of Elasticity (London: McGraw-Hill)
36. Lu Y B et al 2006 Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 17759-64
37. Mathur A B et al 2001 Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy J. Biomech. 34 1545-53
38. Costa K D 2003 Single-cell elastography: probing for disease with the atomic force microscope Dis. Markers 19 139-54
39. Carlisle C R et al 2009 The mechanical properties of individual, electrospun fibrinogen fibers Biomaterials 30 1205-13
40. Liu W et al 2006 Fibrin fibers have extraordinary extensibility and elasticity Science 313 634
41. Peng L et al 2007 A combined atomic force/fluorescence microscopy technique to select aptamers in a single cycle from a small pool of random oligonucleotides Microsc. Res. Tech. 70 372-81
42. Liu W, Bonin K and Guthold M 2007 An easy and direct method for calibrating AFM lateral force measurements Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 063707
43. Sader H S, Biedenbach D and Jones R N 1995 Evaluation of vitek and api-20s for species identification of enterococci Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22 315-9
44. Park S et al 2010 Effect of tip geometry of atomic force microscope on mechanical responses of bovine articular cartilage and agarose gel Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 11 129-36
45. Stolz M et al 2004 Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy Biophys. J. 86 3269-83
46. Buckley C T et al 2009 The effect of concentration, thermal history and cell seeding density on the initial mechanical properties of agarose hydrogels J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2 512-21
47. Nikkhah M et al 2011 Evaluation of the influence of growth medium composition on cell elasticity J. Biomech. 44 762-6
48. Liu R C, Roman M and Yang G L 2010 Correction of the viscous drag induced errors in macromolecular manipulation experiments using atomic force microscope Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81 063703
49. Dokukin M E, Guz N V and Sokolov I 2013 Quantitative study of the elastic modulus of loosely attached cells in AFM indentation experiments Biophys. J. 104 2123-31
50. Iyer S et al 2009 Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 389-93
51. Lekka M et al 2012 Cancer cell detection in tissue sections using AFM Arc. Biochem. Biophys. 518 151-6
52. Wong S Y and Hynes R O 2006 Lymphatic or hematogenous dissemination: how does a metastatic tumor cell decide? Cell Cycle 5 812-7
53. Tan D S P, Agarwal R and Kaye S B 2006 Mechanisms of transcoelomic metastasis in ovarian cancer Lancet Oncol. 7 925-34
54. Coughlin M F et al 2013 Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential Clin. Exp. Metastasis 30 237-50
55. Coughlin M F and Fredberg J J 2013 Changes in cytoskeletal dynamics and nonlinear rheology with metastatic ability in cancer cell lines Phys. Biol. 10 065001
56. Pajerowski J D et al 2007 Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 15619-24
57. Guilak F, Tedrow J R and Burgkart R 2000 Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269 781-6
58. Lee M H et al 2012 Mismatch in mechanical and adhesive properties induces pulsating cancer cell migration in epithelial monolayer Biophys. J. 102 2731-41
59. Levental K R et al 2009 Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling Cell 139 891-906
60. Schmidschonbein G W et al 1981 Passive mechanical-properties of human-leukocytes Biophys. J. 36 243-56
61. Zhou A H, McEwen G D and Wu Y Z 2010 Combined AFM/Raman microspectroscopy for characterization of living cells in near physiological conditions Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education Vol 1 ed A Méndez-Vilas and J Díaz (Badajoz: Formatex Research Center)
62. Pogoda K et al 2012 Depth-sensing analysis of cytoskeleton organization based on AFM data Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. 41 79-87
63. Ma L et al 2001 A hot-spot mutation alters the mechanical properties of keratin filament networks Nat. Cell Bio. 3 503-6
64. Sivaramakrishnan S et al 2008 Micromechanical properties of keratin intermediate filament networks Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 889-94
65. Swaminathan V et al 2011 Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines Cancer Res. 71 5075-80