Actions of the anti-cancer drug suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) on human breast cancer cytoarchitecture in silicon microstructures

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 27, 2010, Pages 7043-7050

  Strobl, Jeannine S ^a,b   Nikkhah, Mehdi ^b   Agah, Masoud ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b State University   (United States)

Author keywords

3 D; Cancer; Cytoskeleton; MDA MB 231 cells; SAHA; Silicon microstructures

Indexed keywords

3-D; ANTI-CANCER AGENTS; ANTICANCER DRUG; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RESEARCH; CELL EXTENSION; CELL LENGTHS; CONTROL-CELL; CYTOARCHITECTURE; CYTOSKELETAL ELEMENTS; CYTOSKELETONS; HUMAN BREAST CANCER; HUMAN BREAST CANCER CELLS; HYDROXAMIC ACIDS; MAMMARY CANCER; MICRO-CHAMBERS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; MICROTUBULE NETWORKS; SILICON MICROSTRUCTURES; SILICON SURFACES; SINGLE ETCH; SINGLE-MASK;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; MICROSTRUCTURE; ORGANIC ACIDS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CELLS;

SILICON; VORINOSTAT; ACTIN; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; HYDROXAMIC ACID; TUBULIN;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; CYTOPLASM; DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NANOFABRICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TUMOR CELL LINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACTINS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS; HUMANS; HYDROXAMIC ACIDS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROTUBULES; TUBULIN;

EID: 77954384251     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Jain K.K. Recent advances in nanooncology. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2008, 7:1-13.
2. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., Peddi B., Agah M. Cytoskeletal role in differential adhesion patterns of normal fibroblasts and breast cancer cells inside silicon microenvironments. Biomed Microdevices 2009, 11:585-595.
3. Kwon K.W., Choi S.S., Lee S.H., Kim B., Lee S.N., Park M.C., et al. Label-free, microfluidic separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells by adhesion difference. Lab Chip 2007, 7:1461-1468.
4. Saadi W., Wang S.J., Lin F., Jeon N.L. A parallel-gradient microfluidic chamber for quantitative analysis of breast cancer cell chemotaxis. Biomed Microdevices 2006, 8:109-118.
5. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., Agah M. Attachment and response of human fibroblast and breast cancer cells to three dimensional silicon microstructures of different geometries. Biomed Microdevices 2009, 11:429-441.
6. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., DeVita R., Agah M. The cytoskeletal organization of breast carcinoma and fibroblast cells inside three dimensional (3-D) isotropic silicon microstructures. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4552-4561.
7. Torisawa Y.S., Shiku H., Yasukawa T., Nishizawa M., Matsue T. Multi-channel 3-D cell culture device integrated on a silicon chip for anticancer drug sensitivity test. Biomaterials 2005, 26:2165-2172.
8. Aggeler J., Ward J., Blackie L.M., Barcellos-Hoff M.H., Streuli C.H., Bissell M.J. Cytodifferentiation of mouse mammary epithelial cells cultured on a reconstituted basement membrane reveals striking similarities to development in vivo. J Cell Sci 1991, 99(Pt 2):407-417.
9. Bissell M.J. Modelling molecular mechanisms of breast cancer and invasion: lessons from the normal gland. Biochem Soc Trans 2007, 35:18-22.
10. Lee G.Y., Kenny P.A., Lee E.H., Bissell M.J. Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Nat Methods 2007, 4:359-365.
11. Keely P. Cell matrix adhesions in three dimensions. Cell junctions. adhesion, development, and disease 2008, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, p. 135-52.
12. Petersen O.W., Ronnov-Jessen L., Howlett A.R., Bissell M.J. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992, 89:9064-9068.
13. Thery M., Piel M. Adhesive micropatterns for cells: a microcontact printing protocol. CSH Protoc 2009, 10.1101/pdb prot5255.
14. Park E.S., Brown A.C., Difeo M.A., Barker T.H., Lu H. Continuously perfused, non-cross-contaminating microfluidic chamber array for studying cellular responses to orthogonal combinations of matrix and soluble signals. Lab Chip 2010, 10:571-580.
15. den Braber E.T., de Ruijter J.E., Ginsel L.A., von Recum A.F., Jansen J.A. Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Biomaterials 1996, 17:2037-2044.
16. Turner A.M., Dowell N., Turner S.W., Kam L., Isaacson M., Turner J.N., et al. Attachment of astroglial cells to microfabricated pillar arrays of different geometries. J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 51:430-441.
17. Hughes L., Malone C., Chumsri S., Burger A.M., McDonnell S. Characterisation of breast cancer cell lines and establishment of a novel isogenic subclone to study migration, invasion and tumourigenicity. Clin Exp Metastasis 2008, 25:549-557.
18. Dawood S., Broglio K., Kau S.W., Green M.C., Giordano S.H., Meric-Bernstam F., et al. Triple receptor-negative breast cancer: the effect of race on response to primary systemic treatment and survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:220-226.
19. Lane A.A., Chabner B.A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:5459-5468.
20. Richon V.M., Garcia-Vargas J., Hardwick J.S. Development of vorinostat: current applications and future perspectives for cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 2009, 280:201-210.
21. Boyault C., Sadoul K., Pabion M., Khochbin S. HDAC6, at the crossroads between cytoskeleton and cell signaling by acetylation and ubiquitination. Oncogene 2007, 26:5468-5476.
22. Zhou Q., Chaerkady R., Shaw P.G., Kensler T.W., Pandey A., Davidson N.E. Screening for therapeutic targets of vorinostat by SILAC-based proteomic analysis in human breast cancer cells. Proteomics 2010, 10:1029-1039.
23. Valenzuela-Fernandez A., Cabrero J.R., Serrador J.M., Sanchez-Madrid F. HDAC6: a key regulator of cytoskeleton, cell migration and cell-cell interactions. Trends Cell Biol 2008, 18:291-297.
24. Cailleau R., Young R., Olive M., Reeves W.J. Breast tumor cell lines from pleural effusions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1974, 53:661-674.
25. Mierke C.T. The role of vinculin in the regulation of the mechanical properties of cells. Cell Biochem Biophys 2009, 53:115-126.
26. Ezzell R.M., Goldmann W.H., Wang N., Parashurama N., Ingber D.E. Vinculin promotes cell spreading by mechanically coupling integrins to the cytoskeleton. Exp Cell Res 1997, 231:14-26.
27. Brew C.T., Aronchik I., Kosco K., McCammon J., Bjeldanes L.F., Firestone G.L. Indole-3-carbinol inhibits MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell motility and induces stress fibers and focal adhesion formation by activation of Rho kinase activity. Int J Cancer 2009, 124:2294-2302.
28. Rosen P.P. Rosen's breast pathology 2008, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 3rd ed.
29. Maurin B., Cañadas P., Baudriller H., Montcourrier P., Bettache N. Mechanical model of cytoskeleton structuration during cell adhesion and spreading. J Biomech 2008, 41:2036-2041.
30. Doughty M.J., Bergmanson J.P., Blocker Y. Shrinkage and distortion of the rabbit corneal endothelial cell mosaic caused by a high osmolality glutaraldehyde-formaldehyde fixative compared to glutaraldehyde. Tissue Cell 1997, 29:533-547.
31. Cox B. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates. Eur J Cancer Prev 2008, 17:306-311.
32. Tabar L., Duffy S.W., Vitak B., Chen H.H., Prevost T.C. The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?. Cancer 1999, 86:449-462.
33. Vignjevic D., Montagnac G. Reorganisation of the dendritic actin network during cancer cell migration and invasion. Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18:12-22.
34. Yamaguchi H., Condeelis J. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1773:642-652.
35. Bauerle T., Adwan H., Kiessling F., Hilbig H., Armbruster F.P., Berger M.R. Characterization of a rat model with site-specific bone metastasis induced by MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and its application to the effects of an antibody against bone sialoprotein. Int J Cancer 2005, 115:177-186.
36. Guarino M. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumour invasion. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007, 39:2153-2160.
37. Wolf K., Friedl P. Mapping proteolytic cancer cell-extracellular matrix interfaces. Clin Exp Metastasis 2009, 26:289-298.
38. Ammer A.G., Weed S.A. Cortactin branches out: roles in regulating protrusive actin dynamics. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2008, 65:687-707.
39. Zhang Y., Zhang M., Dong H., Yong S., Li X., Olashaw N., et al. Deacetylation of cortactin by SIRT1 promotes cell migration. Oncogene 2009, 28:445-460.
40. Etienne-Manneville S. From signaling pathways to microtubule dynamics: the key players. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010, 22:104-111.
41. Brangwynne C.P., MacKintosh F.C., Kumar S., Geisse N.A., Talbot J., Mahadevan L., et al. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J Cell Biol 2006, 173:733-741.
42. Hubbert C., Guardiola A., Shao R., Kawaguchi Y., Ito A., Nixon A., et al. HDAC6 is a microtubule-associated deacetylase. Nature 2002, 417:455-458.
43. Azuma K., Urano T., Horie-Inoue K., Hayashi S.-I., Sakai R., Ouchi Y., et al. Association of estrogen receptor {alpha} and histone deacetylase 6 causes rapid deacetylation of tubulin in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2009, 69:2935-2940.
44. Palmieri D., Lockman P.R., Thomas F.C., Hua E., Herring J., Hargrave E., et al. Vorinostat inhibits brain metastatic colonization in a model of triple-negative breast cancer and induces DNA double-strand breaks. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:6148-6157.
45. Gilchrist K.W., Kalish L., Gould V.E., Hirschl S., Imbriglia J.E., Levy W.M., et al. Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer. An ECOG study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1985, 5:3-10.
46. Kronqvist P., Kuopio T., Collan Y. Morphometric grading of invasive ductal breast cancer. I. Thresholds for nuclear grade. Br J Cancer 1998, 78:800-805.
47. King M.R. Principles of cellular engineering: understanding the biomolecular interface 2005, Burlington Elsevier Academic Press.
48. Wang N., Tolic-Norrelykke I.M., Chen J.X., Mijailovich S.M., Butler J.P., Fredberg J.J., et al. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002, 282:C606-C616.
49. Tan J.L., Tien J., Pirone D.M., Gray D.S., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:1484-1489.
50. Haga H., Sasaki S., Kawabata K., Ito E., Ushiki T., Sambongi T. Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of the cytoskeleton. Ultramicroscopy 2000, 82:253-258.
51. Laurent V.M., Fodil R., Canadas P., Fereol S., Louis B., Planus E., et al. Partitioning of cortical and deep cytoskeleton responses from transient magnetic bead twisting. Ann Biomed Eng 2003, 31:1263-1278.
52. Ananthakrishnan R., Guck J., Wottawah F., Schinkinger S., Lincoln B., Romeyke M., et al. Quantifying the contribution of actin networks to the elastic strength of fibroblasts. J Theor Biol 2006, 242:502-516.