Corrigendum to "Mapping carbon storage in urban trees with multi-source remote sensing data: Relationships between biomass, land use, and demographics in Boston neighborhoods" [Sci. Total Environ., 500-501, (2014), 72-83]. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.070.;Mapping carbon storage in urban trees with multi-source remote sensing data: Relationships between biomass, land use, and demographics in Boston neighborhoods

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 500-501, Issue , 2014, Pages 72-83

  Raciti, Steve M ^a,b   Hutyra, Lucy R ^b   Newell, Jared D ^b  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon cycle; Demographics; High resolution remote sensing; LiDAR; Urban tree canopy; Vegetation biomass

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; DIGITAL STORAGE; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HEATING; HOUSING; LAND USE; OPTICAL RADAR; POPULATION STATISTICS; REMOTE SENSING; SEWAGE; VEGETATION;

CARBON CYCLES; DEMOGRAPHICS; HIGH RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING; URBAN TREE CANOPIES; VEGETATION BIOMASS;

FORESTRY;

CARBON;

BIOMASS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DEMOGRAPHY; LAND USE; LIDAR; MAPPING; NEIGHBORHOOD; REMOTE SENSING; TREE; URBAN FORESTRY; VEGETATION;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CANOPY; CARBON STORAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; INCOME; INDUSTRIAL AREA; LAND USE; NATIONAL PARK; NEIGHBORHOOD; POPULATION DENSITY; RACE; REMOTE SENSING; RESIDENTIAL AREA; TREE; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; WETLAND; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BOSTON; MASSACHUSETTS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMASS; BOSTON; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CITIES; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; TREES;

EID: 84908042868     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.154     Document Type: Erratum

References (92)

1. Alberti M., Marzluff J.M., Shulenberger E., Bradley G., Ryan C., Zumbrunnen C. Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 2003, 52:1169-1179.
2. Angel S., Sheppard S., Civco D., Buckley R., Chabaeva A., Gitlin L., et al. The dynamics of global urban expansion, transport and urban development department 2005, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
3. Baatz M., Schäpe A. Multiresolution segmentation-an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Angewandte Geographische Informations-Verarbeitung XII 1999, 12-23. Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruh. J. Strobl, T. Blaschke, G. Griesebner (Eds.).
4. Baccini A., Laporte N., Goetz S.J., Sun M., Dong H. A first map of tropical Africa's above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery. Environ Res Lett 2008, 3(4):045011.
5. Baccini A., Goetz S.J., Walker W.S., Laporte N.T., Sun M., Sulla-Menashe D., et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat Clim Change 2012, 2(3):182-185.
6. Benz U.C., Hoffmann P., Willhauck G., Lingenfelder I., Heynen M. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 2004, 58:239-258.
7. Birdsey R.A. Carbon storage and accumulation in United States forest ecosystems. General Technical Report WO-59 1992, USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
8. Blackard J.A., Finco M.V., Helmer E.H., Holden G.R., Hoppus M.L., Jacobs D.M., et al. Mapping US forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information. Remote Sens Environ 2008, 112:1658-1677.
9. Boone C.G., Cadenasso M.L., Grove M.J., Schwarz K., Buckley G. Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosyst 2010, 13:225-271.
10. Boston Redevelopment Authority Boston in context: planning districts 2013, Boston Redevelopment Authority, Research Division, City of Boston, [August 15, 2013, http://www.bostonredevelopmentauthority.org/research-maps/research-publications/].
11. 2 and carbon fluxes across a Boston, MA urban gradient. Land 2013, 2(3):304-327.
12. Cadenasso M.L., Pickett T.A., Schwarz K. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ 2007, 5:80-88.
13. Câmara G., Souza R.C.M., Freitas U.M., Garrido J. Spring: integrating remote sensing and GIS by object-oriented data modeling. Comput Graph 1996, 20(3):395-403.
14. Card D.H. Using map category marginal frequencies to improve estimates of thematic map accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 1982, 49:431-439.
15. Chen Y., Su W., Li J., Sun Z. Hierarchical object oriented classification using very high resolution imagery and LIDAR data over urban areas. Adv Space Res 2009, 43:1101-1110.
16. Clemants S.E., Moore G. Patterns of species diversity in eight northeastern United States cities. Urban Habitats 2003, 1(1):4-16.
17. Cochran W.G. Sampling techniques 1977, Wiley, New York, NY.
18. Conway T.M., Shakeel T., Atallah J. Community groups and urban forestry activity: drivers of uneven canopy cover?. Landsc Urban Plan 2011, 101(4):321-329.
19. Davies Z.G., Edmondson J.L., Heinemeyer A., Leake J.R., Gaston K.J. Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. J Appl Ecol 2011, 48:1125-1134.
20. Davies Z.G., Dallimer M., Edmondson J.L., Leake J.R., Gaston K.J. Identifying potential sources of variability between vegetation carbon storage estimates for urban areas. Environ Pollut 2013, 183:133-142.
21. DeFries R.S., Rudel T., Uriarte M., Hansen M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 2010, 3:178-181.
22. Diem J.E., Ricketts C.E., Dean J.R. Impacts of urbanization on land-atmosphere carbon exchange within a metropolitan area in the USA. Climate Res 2006, 30:201-213.
23. Dobbs C., Escobedo F.J., Zipperer W.C. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 2011, 99(3):196-206.
24. Elliott J., Sharma B., Best N., Glotter M., Dunn J.B., Foster I., et al. A spatial modeling framework to evaluate domestic biofuel-induced potential land use changes and emissions. Environ Sci Technol 2014, 48(4):2488-2496.
25. Escobedo F.J., Nowak D.J., Wagner J.E., Luz De la Maza C., Rodríguez M., Crane D.E., et al. The socioeconomics and management of Santiago de Chile's public urban forests. Urban For Urban Green 2006, 4:105-114.
26. Fahey T.J., Knapp A.K. Principles and standards for measuring primary production 2007, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
27. Flocks J., Escobedo F., Wade J., Varela S., Wald C. Environmental justice implications of urban tree cover in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Environ Justice 2011, 4(2):125-134.
28. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309:570-574.
29. Fry J., Xian G., Jin S., Dewitz J., Homer C., Yang L., et al. Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States. PE&RS 2011, 77(9):858-864.
30. Galvin M.F., Grove M.J., O'Neil-Dunne J. A report on the Baltimore City present and potential urban canopy 2006, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD, [17pp.].
31. Goetz S.J., Smith A.J., Jantz C., Wright R.K., Prince S.D., Mazzacato M.E., et al. Monitoring and predicting urban land use change - applications of multi-resolution multi-temporal satellite data. IEEE International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings 2003, 1567-1569.
32. Golubiewski N.E. Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado front range. Ecol Appl 2006, 16:555-571.
33. Greenfield E.D., Nowak J., Walton J.T. Assessment of 2001 NLCD tree and impervious cover estimates. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 2009, 75:1279-1286.
34. Grimm N.B., Faeth S.H., Golubiewski N.E., Redman C.L., Wu J.G., Bai X.M., et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319:756-760.
35. Herold M., Liu X., Clarke K.C. Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 2003, 69:991-1001.
36. Heynen N., Perkins H.A., Roy P. The political ecology of uneven urban green space the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Aff Rev 2006, 42(1):3-25.
37. Hodgson M.E., Jensen J.R., Tullis J.A., Riordan K.D., Archer C.M. Synergistic use of LiDAR and color aerial photography for mapping urban parcel imperviousness. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 2003, 69:973-980.
38. Huang Y., Yu B.L., Zhou J.H., Hu C.L., Tan W.Q., Hu Z.M., et al. Toward automatic estimation of urban green volume using airborne LiDAR data and high resolution remote sensing images. Front Earth Sci 2013, 7:43-54.
39. Hutyra L.R., Yoon B., Hepinstall-Cymerman J., Alberti A. Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: a case study in the Seattle metropolitan region. Landsc Urban Plan 2011, 103:83-93.
40. Hutyra L.R., Yoon B., Alberti A. Terrestrial carbon stocks across a gradient of urbanization: a study of the Seattle, WA region. Glob Chang Biol 2011, 17:783-979.
41. Hyyppa J., Kelle O., Lehikoinen M., Inkinen M. A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2001, 39(5):969-975.
42. IEA World energy outlook 2008 available from. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/.
43. Imhoff M.A., Bounoua L., DeFries R., Lawrence W.T., Stutzer D., Tucker C.J., et al. The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sens Environ 2004, 89:434-443.
44. Iverson L.R., Cook E.A. Urban forest cover of the Chicago region and it relation to household density and income. Urban Ecosyst 2000, 4:105-124.
45. Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 2003, 49:12-35.
46. Jensen J.R. Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective 2000, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
47. Kaye J.P., Groffman P.M., Grimm N.B., Baker L.A., Pouyat R.V. A distinct urban biogeochemistry?. Trends Ecol Evol 2006, 21:192-199.
48. Kellndorfer J., Walker W., Kirsch K., Fiske G., Bishop J., LaPoint L., et al. NACP aboveground biomass and carbon baseline data, V. 2 (NBCD 2000), U.S.A., 2000 2013, ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A., [Data set, Available on-line [http://daac.ornl.gov] from]. 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1161.
49. Kirkpatrick J.B., Daniels G.D., Zagorski T. Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 2007, 79:314-322.
50. Landry S.M., Chakraborty J. Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environ Plan 2009, 41:2651-2670.
51. Lu D., Weng Q. Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+imagery in Marion County, Indiana. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 2005, 71:1275-1284.
52. Luck M., Wu J.G. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landsc Ecol 2002, 17:327-339.
53. Massachusetts Office of Geographic Information (MassGIS) Land use and impervious surface datalayers [Last accessed March 26, 2014]. http://www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/it-serv-and-support/application-serv/office-of-geographic-information-massgis/.
54. McHale M.R., Burke I.C., Lefsky M.A., Peper P.J., McPherson E.G. Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees?. Urban Ecosyst 2009, 12:95-113.
55. McPherson G.E., Nowak D., Heisler G., Grimmond S., Souch C., Grant R., et al. Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosyst 1997, 1:49-61.
56. McPherson G., Simpson J.R., Peper P.J., Maco S.E., Xiao Q.F. Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. J For 2005, 103:411-416.
57. McPherson G.E., Xiao Q., Aguaron E. A new approach to quantify and map carbon stored, sequestered and emissions avoided by urban forests. Landsc Urban Plan 2013, 120:70-84.
58. Myeong S., Nowak D.J., Duggin M.J. A temporal analysis of urban forest carbon storage using remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 2006, 101:277-282.
59. Nichol J., Wong M.S. Remote sensing of urban vegetation life form by spectral mixture analysis of high resolution IKONOS satellite images. Int J Remote Sens 2007, 28:985-1000.
60. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 2002, 116:381-389.
61. Nowak J.D., Greenfield E.J. Urban and community forests of New England (General Technical Report NRS-38) 2008, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Syracuse, NY.
62. Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J. Evaluating the National Land Cover Database tree canopy and impervious cover estimates across the conterminous United States: a comparison with photo-interpreted estimates. Environ Manag 2010, 46:378-390.
63. Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J. Tree and impervious cover change in US cities. Urban For Urban Green 2012, 11(1):21-30.
64. Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J., Hoehn R.E., Lapoint E. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut 2013, 178:229-236.
65. O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., MacFaden S.W., Royar A.R., Pelletier K.C. An object-based system for LiDAR data fusion and feature extraction 2012, Geocarto International. 10.1080/10106049.2012.689015.
66. Oke T.R. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 1982, 108:1-24.
67. Pataki D.E., Alig R.J., Fung A.S., Golubiewski N.E., Kennedy C.A., McPherson E.G., et al. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Glob Chang Biol 2006, 12:2092-2102.
68. Perkins H.A., Heynen N., Wilson J. Inequitable access to urban reforestation: the impact of urban political economy on 'and urban forests. Cities 2004, 21:291-299.
69. Popescu Sorin C., Wynne Randolph H., Scrivani John A. Fusion of small-footprint lidar and multispectral data to estimate plot-level volume and biomass in deciduous and pine forests in Virginia, USA. For Sci 2004, 50:551-565.
70. Potere D., Schneider A. A critical look at representations of urban area in global maps. GeoJournal 2007, 69:55-80.
71. Raciti S.M., Galvin M.F., Grove J.M., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Todd A., Claggett S. Urban tree canopy goal setting: a guide for communities 2006, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD.
72. Raciti S.M., Groffman P.M., Jenkins J.C., Pouyat R.V., Fahey T.J., Pickett S.T.A., et al. Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen in residential soils with different land use histories. Ecosystems 2011, 14(2):287-297.
73. Raciti S.M., Hutyra L.R., Rao P., Finzi A.C. Soil and vegetation carbon in urban ecosystems: the importance of importance of urban definition and scale. Ecol Appl 2012, 22(3):1015-1035.
74. Ruesch A., Gibbs H.K. New IPCC tier-1 global biomass carbon map for the year 2000 2008, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, [Available online from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center [[http://cdiac.ornl.gov]].
75. Sadik N. Meeting the urban population challenge. City Dev Strateg 1999, 1:16-23.
76. Schneider A., Woodcock C.E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in 25 global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud 2008, 45:659-692.
77. Schneider A., Friedl M.A., Potere D. Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: new methods and datasets based on 'urban ecoregions'. Remote Sens Environ 2010, 114:1733-1746.
78. Seto K.C., Fragkias M., Guneralp B., Reilly M.K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(8):e23777.
79. Seto K.C., Burak G., Hutyra L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109. [16083016088].
80. Smith M.L., Zhou W., Cadenasso M., Grove M., Band L.E. Evaluation of the National Land Cover Database for hydrologic applications in urban and suburban Baltimore, Maryland1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2010, 46(2):429-442.
81. Szantoi Z., Escobedo F., Wagner J., Rodriguez J.M., Smith S. Socioeconomic factors and urban tree cover policies in a subtropical urban forest. GISci Remote Sens 2012, 49(3):428-449.
82. Timilsina N., Staudhammer C.L., Escobedo F.J., Lawrence A. Tree biomass, wood waste yield, and carbon storage changes in an urban forest. Landsc Urban Plan 2014, 127:18-27.
83. Tooke T.R., Coops N.C., Goodwin N.R., Voogt J.A. Extracting urban vegetation characteristics using spectral mixture analysis and decision tree classifications. Remote Sens Environ 2009, 113:398-407.
84. UNFPA United Nations: state of the world population 2007.
85. Urban Ecology Institute State of the urban forest report [accessed July 19, 2009]. http://www.urbaneco.org/State%20of%20the%20Urban%20Forest%20Report.pdf.
86. 2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest. J Geophys Res 2007, 112. G02020.
87. Walker J.S., Briggs J.M. An object-oriented approach to urban forest mapping in Phoenix. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 2007, 73:577-583.
88. Woodcock C.E., Strahler A.H. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 1987, 21(3):311-332.
89. Xiao Q., Ustin S.L., McPherson E.G. Using AVIRIS data and multiple-masking techniques to map urban forest tree species. Int J Remote Sens 2004, 25:5637-5654.
90. Zhang X., Friedl M., Schaaf C.B., Strahler A.H., Schneider A. The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology. Geophys Res Lett 2004, 31:L12209.
91. Zhou W., Troy A. An object-oriented approach for analyzing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. Int J Remote Sens 2008, 29:3119-3135.
92. Zhou W.Q., Huang G.L., Cadenasso M.L. Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 2011, 102:54-63.