A new approach to quantify and map carbon stored, sequestered and emissions avoided by urban forests

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 120, Issue , 2013, Pages 70-84

  McPherson, E Gregory ^a   Xiao, Qingfu ^b   Aguaron, Elena ^c  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon density; Climate action planning; Transfer function; Urban forest structure; Urban tree canopy; Wood density

Indexed keywords

CARBON; ENERGY CONSERVATION; HARDWOODS; REMOTE SENSING; SURVEYS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

ACTION PLANNING; CARBON DENSITY; URBAN FORESTS; URBAN TREE CANOPIES; WOOD DENSITY;

FORESTRY;

ACTION PLAN; BASAL AREA; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECIDUOUS FOREST; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; MAP; REMOTE SENSING; URBAN FORESTRY;

CARBON; DENSITY; FOREST CANOPY; FORESTRY; HARDWOODS; SURVEYS; WOOD DENSITY;

CALIFORNIA; LOS ANGELES [CALIFORNIA]; SACRAMENTO; UNITED STATES;

QUERCUS;

EID: 84886558464     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aguaron E., McPherson E.G. Comparison of methods for estimating carbon dioxide storage by Sacramento's urban forest. Carbon sequestration in urban ecosystems 2012, 43-71. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. R. Lal, B. Augustin (Eds.).
2. Berland A. Long-term urbanization effects on tree canopy cover along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 2012, 10 1007/s11252-012-0224-9.
3. Brack C.L., Richards G.P. Carbon accounting model for forests in Australia. Environmental Pollution 2002, 116:S187-S194. 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00250-0.
4. Brookshire D.S., Neill H.R. Benefit transfers: Conceptual and empirical issues. Water Resources Research 1992, 28(3):651-655. 10.1029/91wr02590.
5. Cairns M.A., Brown S., Helmer E.H., Baumgardner G.A. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia 1997, 111.
6. California Air Resources Board Climate change scoping plan 2008, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
7. California Air Resources Board Compliance offset protocol: Urban forest projects 2011, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
8. Chaparro L., Terradas J. Ecological services of urban forest in Barcelona 2009, Centre de Recerca Ecologica i, Aplicacions Forestals, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
9. Climate Action Reserve Urban forest project protocol. Version 1.1 2010, Climate Action Reserve, Los Angeles.
10. Conway T.M., Shakeel T., Atallah J. Community groups and urban forestry activity: drivers of uneven canopy cover?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 101(4):321-329. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.037.
11. Cox W. New US urban area data released 2012, Newgeography, Retrieved from newgeography website: http://www.newgeography.com/content/002747-new-us-urban-area-data-released.
12. Downing M., Ozuna T. Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1996, 30:316-322.
13. Escobedo F., Varela S., Zhao M., Wagner J.E., Zipperer W. Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environmental Science and Policy 2010, 13(5):362-372. 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.009.
14. Gillespie T.J., Pincetl S., Brossard S., Smith J., Saatchi S., Pataki D., et al. A time series of urban forestry in Los Angeles. Urban Ecosystems 2012, 15(1):233-246. 10.1007/s11252-011-0183-6.
15. Grove J.M., Cadenasso M.L., Burch W.R., Pickett S.T., Schwarz K., O'Neil-Dunne J., et al. Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland. Society and Natural Resources 2006, 19:117-136.
16. Heath L.S., Smith J.E., Skog K.E., Nowak D.J., Woodall C.W. Managed forest carbon estimates for the US greenhouse gas inventory 1990-2008. Journal of Forestry 2011, 109(3):167-173.
17. Hildebrandt E.W., Sarkovich M. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of SMUD's shade tree program. Atmospheric Environment 1998, 32:85-94.
18. Hope D., Gries C., Zhu W., Fagan W.F., Redman C.L., Grimm N.B., et al. Socio-economics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003, 100.
19. Husch B., Miller C.I., Beers T.W. Forest mensuration 1982, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
20. Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R.A. Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species 2003, (Gen. Tech. Rep/NE-319), US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
21. Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R.A. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science 2003, 49(1):12-35.
22. Jo H.K. Impacts of urban greenspace on offsetting carbon emissions for middle Korea. Journal of Environmental Management 2002, 64(2):115-126. 10.1006/jema.2001.0491.
23. Jo H.K., McPherson E.G. Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. Journal of Environmental Management 1995, 45:109-133.
24. Ketterings Q.M., Coe R., van Noordwijk M., Ambagau' Y., Palm C.A. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2001, 146(1-3):199-209. 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00460-6.
25. Kohavi R., Provost F. Glossary of terms. Machine Learning 1998, 30:271-274.
26. Lefsky M., McHale M. Volume estimates of trees with complex architecture from terrestrial laser scanning. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2008, 2:023521. 10.1117/1.2939008.
27. Lieth H., Lieth H., Whittaker R.H. Modeling the primary productivity of the world. Primary productivity of the biosphere 1975, 237-263. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York.
28. Liu C.F., Li X.M. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2012, 11(2):121-128. 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.002.
29. Lowry J.H., Baker M.E., Ramsey R.D. Determinants of urban tree canopy in residential neighborhoods: Household characteristics, urban form, and the geophysical landscape. Urban Ecosystems 2012, 15(1):247-266. 10.1007/s11252-011-0185-4.
30. Markwardt L.J., Wilson T.R.C. Strength and related properties of woods grown in the United States 1935, (Tech. Bull. No. 479), USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
31. Martin C.A., Stabler L.B. Urban horticultural ecology: Interactions between plants, people and the physical environment. Acta Horticulturae 2004, 639.
32. Martin N.A., Chappelka A.H., Somers G., Loewenstein E.F., Keever G.J. Evaluation of sampling protocol for i-Tree Eco: A case study in predicting ecosystem services at Auburn University. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 2013, 39(2):56-61.
33. McNeil J., Vava C. Oakville's urban forest: Our solution to pollution 2006, Town of Oakville Parks and Open Space Department, Forestry Section, Oakville, Ontario.
34. McPherson E.G. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento's urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 1998, 24(4):215-223.
35. McPherson E.G., Rowntree R.A. Energy conservation potential of urban tree planting. Journal of Arboriculture 1993, 19:321-331.
36. McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Peper P.J., Maco S.E., Xiao Q. Municipal forest benefits and costs in five U.S. cities. Journal of Forestry 2005, 103:411-416.
37. McPherson G., Simpson J., Marconett D., Peper P., Aguaron E. Urban forestry and climate change 2008, http://www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/topics/urban-forests/.
38. McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Xiao Q.F., Wu C.X. Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 99(1):40-50. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.011.
39. Myeong S., Nowak D.J., Duggin M.J. A temporal analysis of urban forest carbon storage using remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 2006, 101(2):277-282. 10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.001.
40. Nowak D.J. Houston's regional forest: Structure, functions, values 2005, Texas Forest Service, Austin, TX.
41. Nowak D.J., Crane D. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Toronto's urban forest 2002, http://www.ufore.org/action/09-00.html (Retrieved 24.02.12).
42. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 2002, 116(3):381-389. 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00214-7.
43. Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J. Evaluating the National Land Cover Database tree canopy and impervious cover estimates across the conterminous United States: a comparison with photo-interpreted estimates. Environmental Management 2010, 46(3):378-390. 10.1007/s00267-010-9536-9.
44. Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J. Urban and community forests of the Pacific region: California, Oregon, Washington 2010, (Gen. Tech. Re. NRS-65), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
45. Nowak D.J., Rowntree R.A., McPherson E.G., Sisinni S.M., Kerkmann E.R., Stevens J.C. Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning 1996, 36:49-57.
46. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C. Syracuse's urban forest resource. Syracuse Urban Forest Master Plan: Guiding the City's Forest Resource in the 21st Century 2001, 9-14. (Vol. Gen. Tech. ReNE-287), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. D.J. Nowak, P. O'Connor (Eds.).
47. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Walton J.T. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Casper WY's urban forest 2006, (Res. Bull. NRS-4), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
48. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Walton J.T. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Minneapolis' urban forest 2006, (Res. Bull. NE-166), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
49. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Walton J.T. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Washington DC's urban forest 2006, (Res. Bull. NRS-1), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
50. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Walton J.T. Assessing urban forest effects and values: New York city's urban forest 2007, (Res. Bull. NRS-9), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
51. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Walton J.T. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Philadelphia's urban forest 2007, (Res. Bull. NRS-7), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
52. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R.E., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Walton J.T. Assessing urban forest effects and values: San Francisco's urban forest 2007, (Resource Bulletin NRS-8), Northeastern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA.
53. Nowak D.J., Crane D., Stevens J., Hoehn R., Walton J., Bond J. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 2008, 34(6):347-358.
54. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Cotrone V. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Scranton's urban forest 2010, (Res. Bull. NRS-43), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
55. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Fisher C.L. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Chicago's urban forest 2010, (Res. Bull. NRS-37), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
56. Nowak D.J., Hoehn R.E., Crane D.E., Weller L., Davila A. Assessing urban forest effects and values: Los Angeles' urban forest 2011, (Resource Bulletin NRS-47), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
57. O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., MacFaden S.W., Royar A.R., Pelletier K.C. An object-based system for LiDAR data fusion and feature extraction. Geocarto International 2012, 10.1080/10106049.2012.689015.
58. Palmer J.F. Neighborhoods as stands in the urban forest. Urban Ecology 1984, 8:229-241.
59. Peper P.J., McPherson E.G., Mori S.M. Equations for predicting diameter, height, crown width and leaf area of San Joaquin Valley street trees. Journal of Arboriculture 2001, 27(6):306-317.
60. Peper P.J., McPherson E.G., Mori S.M. Predictive equations for dimensions and leaf area of coastal Southern California street trees. Journal of Arboriculture 2001, 27(4):169-180.
61. Pillsbury N., Reimer J.L., Thompson R. Tree volume equations for fifteen urban species in California. San Luis Obispo: Urban forest ecosystems institute 1998, California Polytechnic State University.
62. Raciti S.M., Galvin M.F., Grove J.M., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Todd A., Clagett S. Urban tree canopy goal setting: A guide for Chesapeake Bay communities 2006, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry, Annapolis, MD.
63. Raciti S.M., Hutyra L.R., Rao P., Finzi A.C. Inconsistent definitions of urban result in different conclusions about the size of urban carbon and nitrogen stocks. Ecological Applications 2012, 22(3):1015-1035.
64. Ryan M.G., Harmon M.E., Birdsey R.A., Giardina C.P., Heath L.S., Houghton R.A., et al. A synthesis of the science on forests and carbon for U.S. forests. Issues in Ecology 2010, 13:1-16.
65. Sanders R.A. Some determinants of urban forest structure. Urban Ecology 1984, 8:13-27.
66. Simpson W.T. Specific gravity, moisture content, and density relationship for wood 1993, (Gen. Tech. Rep. FPR-GTR-76), U.S. Dept. of Agric., Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
67. Simpson J.R. Improved estimates of tree shade effects on residential energy use. Energy and Buildings 2002, 34(10):1073-1082.
68. Stone B. The city and the coming climate: Climate change in the places we live 2012, 187. Cambridge University Press, New York.
69. Strohbach M.W., Haase D. Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105(1-2). 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.018 184-184.
70. Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute SelecTree 1995-2012, January, California Polytechnic State University, Retrieved from http://selectree.calpoly.edu/.
71. Wang Y.-C., Lin J.-C. Air quality enhancement zones in Taiwan: A carbon reduction benefit assessment. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 23(0):40-45. 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.07.009.
72. Wenger K.F. Forestry handbook 1984, John Wiley and Sons, New York. NY.
73. Xiao Q., McPherson E.G. Tree health mapping with multispectral remote sensing data at UC Davis, California. Urban Ecosystems 2005, 8(3-4):349-361.
74. Xiao Q., Ustin S., McPherson E., Peper P., Green R.O. Characterization of the structure and species composition of urban trees using high resolution AVIRIS data. Summaries of the eight JPL airborne earth science workshop 1999, 451-460. California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
75. Xiao Q., Wu C., Simpson J., McPherson E.G. Urban forests for clean air demonstration project - Land cover, land use and urban forest analysis 2009, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, UC Davis, Davis, CA, (Final report).
76. Yang J., McBride J., Zhou J., Sun Z. The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2005, 3:65-78.
77. Yesilonis I.D., Pouyat R.V. Carbon stocks in urban forest remnants: Atlanta and Baltimore as case studies. Carbon sequestration in urban ecosystems 2012, 103-120. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. R. Lal, B. Augustin (Eds.).
78. Zhao M., Kong Z.H., Escobedo F.J., Gao J. Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91(4):807-813. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.010.
79. Zipperer W.C., Sisinni S.M., Pouyat R.V., Foresman T.W. Urban tree cover: An ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems 1997, 1(4):229-246. 10.1023/a:1018587830636.