Bioclimatic evaluation of geographical range in Fragaria (Rosaceae): Consequences of variation in breeding system, ploidy and species age

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 176, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 99-114

  Johnson, Anna L ^a   Govindarajulu, Rajanikanth ^b   Ashman, Tia Lynn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural wild relatives; Baker's law; Bioclimatic niche; Phylogenetic niche conservation

Indexed keywords

FRAGARIA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 84908039958     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/boj.12190     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Alexander JM, Edwards PJ. 2010. Limits to the niche and range margins of alien species. Oikos 119: 1377-1386.
2. Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH. 2006. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters 9: 683-693.
3. Ashman TL. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 648-661.
4. Ashman TL, Spigler RB, Goldberg MT, Govindarajulu R. 2012. Fragaria: a polyploid lineage for understanding sex chromosome evolution. In: Navajas-Perez R, ed. New insights on plant sex chromosomes. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 67-89.
5. Baker HG. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after 'long-distance' dispersal. Evolution 9: 347-349.
6. te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Brysting AK, Suda J, Kubesova M, Pysek P. 2011. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109: 19-45.
7. Beyer HL. 2010. Geospatial modelling environment, Version 0.6.0.0. Spatial Ecology LLC. Available at: http://www.spatialecology.com/gme/gmedownload.htm
8. Blomberg SP, Garland Jr. T, Ives AR. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745.
9. Böhning-Gaese K, Caprano T, van Ewijk K, Veith M. 2006. Range size: disentangling current traits and phylogenetic and biogeographic factors. The American Naturalist 167: 555-567.
10. Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM. 1996. The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 597-623.
11. Burgman MA, Fox JC. 2003. Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Animal Conservation 6: 19-28.
12. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2004. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 33: 261-304.
13. Busch JW, Schoen DJ. 2008. The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting. Trends in Plant Science 13: 128-136.
14. Carrasco B, Garces M, Rojas P, Saud G, Herrera R, Retamales JB, Caligari PDS. 2007. The Chilean strawberry [Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Duch.]: genetic diversity and structure. Journal of the American Horticultural Society 132: 501-506.
15. Chukhina IG. 2008. Fragaria. Interactive agricultural ecological atlas of Russia and neighboring countries. Economic plants and their diseases, pests and weeds. [online]. Available at: http://www.agroatlas.ru [accessed 29 April 2014].
16. Chytrý M, Ermakov N, Danihelka J, Hájek M, Hájková P, Horsák M, Kočí M, Kubešová S, Lustyk P, Otýpková Z, Pelánková B, Valachovič M, Zelený D. 2012. High species richness in hemiboreal forests of the northern Russian Altai, southern Siberia (M. Huston, Ed.). Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 605-616.
17. Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B. 1999. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 405-410.
18. Crooks JA, Soulé ME. 1999. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken Å, eds. Invasive species and biodiversity management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 103-125.
19. De Bodt S, Maere S, Vandepeer Y. 2005. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 591-597.
20. DeVore ML, Pigg KB. 2007. A brief review of the fossil history of the family Rosaceae with a focus on the Eocene Okanogan Highlands of eastern Washington State, USA, and British Columbia, Canada. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 45-57.
21. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
22. Duchoslav M, Šafářová L, Krahulec F. 2010. Complex distribution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of Allium oleraceum (Alliaceae) in the Czech Republic. Annals of Botany 105: 719-735.
23. Ensing DJ, Moffat CE, Pither J. 2012. Taxonomic identification errors generate misleading ecological niche model predictions of an invasive hawkweed. Botany 91: 137-147.
24. Ettinger AK, HilleRisLambers J. 2013. Climate isn't everything: competitive interactions and variation by life stage will also affect range shifts in a warming world. American Journal of Botany 100: 1344-1355.
25. Ford-Lloyd BV, Schmidt M, Armstrong SJ, Barazani O, Engels J, Hadas R, Hammer K, Kell SP, Kang D, Khoshbakht K, Li Y, Long C, Lu BR, Ma K, Nguyen VT, Qiu L, Ge S, Wei W, Zhang Z, Maxted N. 2011. Crop wild relatives - undervalued, underutilized and under threat? BioScience 61: 559-565.
26. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160: 712-726.
27. Fritz SA, Purvis A. 2010. Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conservation Biology 24: 1042-1051.
28. Futuyma DJ. 2010. Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64: 1865-1884.
29. Gaston KJ. 1998. Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353: 219-230.
30. Glennon KL, Rissler LJ, Church SA. 2012. Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 26: 909-926.
31. Gorelick R, Heng HHQ. 2011. Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review. Evolution 65: 1088-1098.
32. Haider S, Alexander J, Dietz H, Trepl L, Edwards PJ, Kueffer C. 2010. The role of bioclimatic origin, residence time and habitat context in shaping non-native plant distributions along an altitudinal gradient. Biological Invasions 12: 4003-4018.
33. Hancock JF. 1999. Strawberries. New York: CABI.
34. Hancock JF, Luby JJ. 1993. Genetic resources at our doorstep: the wild strawberries. BioScience 43: 141-147.
35. Hao JH, Qiang S, Chrobock T, Kleunen M, Liu QQ. 2011. A test of Baker's law: breeding systems of invasive species of Asteraceae in China. Biological Invasions 13: 571-580.
36. Hickerson MJ, Carstens BC, Cavender-Bares J, Crandall KA, Graham CH, Johnson JB, Rissler L, Victoriano PF, Yoder AD. 2010. Phylogeography's past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, 2000. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 291-301.
37. Hijmans RJ, Gavrilenko T, Stephenson S, Bamberg J, Salas A, Spooner DM. 2007. Geographical and environmental range expansion through polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 485-495.
38. Hilu KW. 1993. Polyploidy and plant domestication. American Journal of Botany 80: 1494-1499.
39. Hummer KE. 2012. A new species of Fragaria (Rosaceae) from Oregon. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 6: 9-15.
40. Jarvis A, Lane A, Hijmans RJ. 2008. The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 126: 13-23.
41. Johnson MTJ, Smith SD, Rausher MD. 2010. Effects of plant sex on range distributions and allocation to reproduction. New Phytologist 186: 769-779.
42. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. 1997. Evolution of a species' range. The American Naturalist 150: 1-23.
43. Kolář F, Štech M, Traávníček P, Rauchová J, Urfus T, Vít P, Kubešová M, Suda J. 2009. Towards resolving the Knautia arvensis agg. (Dipsacaceae) puzzle: primary and secondary contact zones and ploidy segregation at landscape and microgeographic scales. Annals of Botany 103: 963-974.
44. Kruskal JB, Wish M. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Levin DA. 2011. Mating system shifts on the trailing edge. Annals of Botany 109: 613-620.
46. Li J, Koski MH, Ashman TL. 2012. Functional characterization of gynodioecy in Fragaria vesca ssp. bracteata (Rosaceae). Annals of Botany 109: 545-552.
47. Liow LH, Stenseth NC. 2007. The rise and fall of species: implications for macroevolutionary and macroecological studies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 2745-2752.
48. Losos JB. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters 11: 995-1003.
49. Lowry E, Lester SE. 2006. The biogeography of plant reproduction: potential determinants of species' range sizes. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1975-1982.
50. Madlung A. 2013. Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: old questions revisited with new tools. Heredity 110: 99-104.
51. Martin SL, Husband BC. 2009. Influence of phylogeny and ploidy on species ranges of North American angiosperms. Journal of Ecology 97: 913-922.
52. McIntyre PJ. 2012. Polyploidy associated with altered and broader ecological niches in the Claytonia perfoliata (Portulacaceae) species complex. American Journal of Botany 99: 655-662.
53. Minchin PR. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89-107.
54. Njuguna W, Liston A, Cronn R, Ashman TL, Bassil N. 2013. Insights into phylogeny, sex function and age of Fragaria based on whole chloroplast genome sequencing. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66: 17-29.
55. Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens HH, Wagner H. 2011. Vegan: community ecology package version 2.0.2. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html.
56. Orme CDL, Freckleton RP, Thomas GH, Petzoldt T, Fritz SA. 2011. Caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R version 0.5. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caper/index.html.
57. Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401-437.
58. Pandit MK, Pocock MJO, Kunin WE. 2011. Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants. Journal of Ecology 99: 1108-1115.
59. Pateiro-López B, Rodríguez-Casal A. 2010. Generalizing the convex hull of a sample: the R package alphahull. Journal of Statistical Software 34: 1-28.
60. Paul JR, Morton C, Taylor CM, Tonsor SJ. 2009. Evolutionary time for dispersal limits the extent but not the occupancy of species' potential ranges in the tropical plant genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae). The American Naturalist 173: 188-199.
61. Pautasso M. 2011. Challenges in the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources. Biology Letters 8: 321-323.
62. Pearson RG, Dawson TP. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 361-371.
63. Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS. 2005. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5: 9-13.
64. Peterson AT. 2011. Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. Journal of Biogeography 38: 817-827.
65. Petit C, Lesbros P, Ge X, Thompson JD. 1997. Variation in flowering phenology and selfing rate across a contact zone between diploid and tetraploid Arrhenatherum elatius (Poaceae). Heredity 79: 31-40.
66. Petit C, Thompson JD. 1999. Species diversity and ecological range in relation to ploidy level in the flora of the Pyrenees. Evolutionary Ecology 13: 45-65.
67. Pigot AL, Owens IPF, Orme CDL. 2012. Speciation and extinction drive the appearance of directional range size evolution in phylogenies and the fossil record. PLoS Biology 10: e1001260.
68. Prunier R, Holsinger KE, Carlson JE. 2012. The effect of historical legacy on adaptation: do closely related species respond to the environment in the same way? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 1636-1649.
69. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
70. Randle AM, Slyder JB, Kalisz S. 2009. Can differences in autonomous selfing ability explain differences in range size among sister-species pairs of Collinsia (Plantaginaceae)? An extension of Baker's law. New Phytologist 183: 618-629.
71. Revell LJ. 2010. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1: 319-329.
72. Revell LJ. 2012. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 217-223.
73. Robertson K, Goldberg EE, Igić B. 2011. Comparative evidence for the correlated evolution of polyploidy and self-compatibility in Solanaceae. Evolution 65: 139-155.
74. Roughgarden J. 1972. Evolution of niche width. The American Naturalist 106: 683-718.
75. Sanderson MJ. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19: 301-302.
76. SAS. 2008. SAS for Windows (version 9.2). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
77. Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP. 2013. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecology Letters 16: 1104-1114.
78. Soltis DE, Buggs RJA, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS. 2010. What we still don't know about polyploidy. Taxon 59: 1387-1403.
79. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60: 561-588.
80. Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, Escobar Garcia P, Rauchova J, Suda J, Schneeweiss GM, Hulber K, Schonswetter P. 2010. Distribution and habitat segregation on different spatial scales among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae) in the eastern Alps. Annals of Botany 106: 967-977.
81. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
82. Staudt G. 2009. Strawberry biogeography, genetics and systematics. Acta Horticulturae 842: 71-83.
83. Stevens GC. 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist 133: 240-256.
84. Stewart P, Folta K. 2010. A review of photoperiodic flowering research in strawberry (Fragaria spp.). Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 29: 1-13.
85. Struwe L, Smouse PE, Heiberg E, Haag S, Lathrop RG. 2011. Spatial evolutionary and ecological vicariance analysis (SEEVA), a novel approach to biogeography and speciation research, with an example from Brazilian Gentianaceae: SEEVA methodology. Journal of Biogeography 38: 1841-1854.
86. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Townsend Peterson A, Phillips OL, Williams SE. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145-148.
87. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Midgley G, Lavergne S, Rebelo T. 2004. Relating plant traits and species distributions along bioclimatic gradients for 88 Leucadendron species. Ecology 85: 1688-1699.
88. Ulrich D, Komes D, Olbricht K, Hoberg E. 2007. Diversity of aroma patterns in wild and cultivated Fragaria accessions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 1185-1196.
89. Webb TJ, Gaston KJ. 2000. Geographic range size and evolutionary age in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267: 1843-1850.
90. Webb TJ, Gaston KJ. 2003. On the heritability of geographic range sizes. The American Naturalist 161: 553-566.
91. Whitaker VM. 2011. Applications of molecular markers in strawberry. Journal of Berry Research 1: 115-127.
92. Wiens JJ. 2004. Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservation and the origin of species. Evolution 58: 193-197.
93. Wiens JJ, Graham CH. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 36: 519-539.
94. Witcombe J, Hollington P, Howarth C, Reader S, Steele K. 2008. Breeding for abiotic stresses for sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 703-716.
95. Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. 2009. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 13875-13879.
96. Yesson C, Culham A. 2006. A phyloclimatic study of Cyclamen. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 72-95.