Contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging in the detection of reduced coronary flow velocity reserve

Radiology

Volumn 243, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 377-385

  Barmeyer, Achim A ^a   Stork, Alexander ^b   Muellerleile, Kai ^a   Tiburtius, Claudia ^a   Schofer, Anne K ^a   Heitzer, Thomas A ^a   Hofmann, Thomas ^a   Adam, Gerhard ^b   Meinertz, Thomas ^a   Lund, Gunnar K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 34247494599     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060331     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC, Reichek N. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:940-947.
2. Porenta G, Binder T, Moertl D, et al. Functional assessment of coronary arteries by poststenotic intravascular Doppler ultrasound. J Vasc Res 2000;37:594-602.
3. Chamuleau SA, Meuwissen M, van Eck-Smit BL, et al. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1316-1322.
4. Miller DD, Donohue TJ, Wolford TL, Kern MJ. Assessment of blood flow distal to coronary artery stenoses: correlations between myocardial positron emission tomography and poststenotic intracoronary Doppler flow reserve. Circulation 1996;94:2447-2454.
5. Miller DD, Holmvang G, Gill JB, et al. MRI detection of myocardial perfusion changes by gadolinium-DTPA infusion during dipyridamole hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1989;10:246-255.
6. Schaefer S, Lange RA, Gutekunst DP, Parkey RW, Willerson JT, Peshock RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hypoperfused myocardium. Invest Radiol 1991;26:551-556.
7. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:757-762.
8. Cullen JH, Horsfield MA, Reek CR, Cherryman GR, Barnett DB, Samani NJ. A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1386-1394.
9. Penzkofer H, Wintersperger BJ, Knez A, Weber J, Reiser M. Assessment of myocardial perfusion using multisection first-pass MRI and color-coded parameter maps: a comparison to 99mTc Sesta MIBI SPECT and systolic myocardial wall thickening analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:161-170.
10. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108:432-437.
11. Eichenberger AC, Schuiki E, Kochli VD, Amann FW, McKinnon GC, von Schulthess GK. Ischemic heart disease: assessment with gadolinium-enhanced ultrafast MR imaging and dipyridamole stress. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:425-431.
12. Matheijssen NA, Louwerenburg HW, van Rugge FP, et al. Comparison of ultrafast dipyridamole magnetic resonance imaging with dipyridamole sestaMIBI SPECT for detection of perfusion abnormalities in patients with one-vessel coronary artery disease: assessment by quantitative model fitting. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:221-228.
13. Keijer JT, van Rossum AC, van Eenige MJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of regional myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: quantitative comparison with (201)thallium-SPECT and coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:607-615.
14. Klein MA, Collier BD, Hellman RS, Bamrah VS. Detection of chronic coronary artery disease: value of pharmacologically stressed, dynamically enhanced turbo-fast low-angle shot MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:257-263.
15. Lauerma K, Virtanen KS, Sipila LM, Hekali P, Aronen HJ. Multislice MRI in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease before and after revascularization. Circulation 1997;96:2859-2867.
16. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003;229:209-216.
17. Bremerich J, Buser P, Bongartz G, et al. Noninvasive stress testing of myocardial ischemia: comparison of GRE-MRI perfusion and wall motion analysis to 99 mTc-MIBI-SPECT, relation to coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 1997;7:990-995.
18. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235.
19. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101:1379-1383.
20. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 2004;110:835-842.
21. Al-Saadi N, Gross M, Bornstedt A, et al. Comparison of different semiquantitative parameters for the assessment of a myocardial perfusion index by magnetic resonance imaging. Z Kardiol 2001;90:824-834.
22. Iltis I, Kober F, Dalmasso C, Cozzone PJ, Bernard M. Noninvasive characterization of myocardial blood flow in diabetic, hypertensive, and diabetic-hypertensive rats using spin-labeling MRI. Microcirculation 2005;12:607-614.
23. Sander GE, Wilklow FE, Giles TD. Heart failure in diabetes mellitus: causal and treatment considerations. Minerva Cardioangiol 2004;52:491-503.
24. Rodriguez-Porcel M, Zhu XY, Chade AR, et al. Functional and structural remodeling of the myocardial microvasculature in early experimental hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;290:H978-H984. [Published correction appears in Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;290:H2163.]
25. de Jongh RT, Serne EH, IJzerman RG, de Vries G, Stehouwer CD. Impaired microvascular function in obesity: implications for obesity-associated microangiopathy, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Circulation 2004;109:2529-2535.
26. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM, et al. Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 2001;104:2412-2416.
27. Keijer JT, van Rossum AC, Wilke N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion in single-vessel coronary artery disease: implications for transmural assessment of myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000;2:189-200.
28. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1948-1953.
29. Hoffman JI. Heterogeneity of myocardial blood flow. Basic Res Cardiol 1995;90:103-111.
30. Jennings RB, Steenbergen C Jr, Reimer KA. Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Monogr Pathol 1995;37:47-80.
31. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:677-684.