DNA barcode authentication of wood samples of threatened and commercial timber trees within the tropical dry evergreen forest of india

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Nithaniyal, Stalin ^a   Newmaster, Steven G ^b   Ragupathy, Subramanyam ^b   Krishnamoorthy, Devanathan ^a   Vassou, Sophie Lorraine ^a   Parani, Madasamy ^a  

^a SRM UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; GENETIC MARKER;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BARCODING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EVERGREEN; INDIA; NATIVE SPECIES; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY; TIMBER TREE; TREE; TROPICS; WOOD; CLASSIFICATION; FOREST; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TROPIC CLIMATE;

DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FORESTS; GENETIC MARKERS; GEOGRAPHY; INDIA; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES; TROPICAL CLIMATE; WOOD;

EID: 84907908415     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107669     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Kumar NK, Raghunath TP, Jayaraj RSC, Anandalakshmi R, Warrier RR, editors (2012) State of forest genetic resources in India: A Country report. Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Coimbatore.
2. Goyal AK, Sujata A, editors (2009) India's fourth national report to convention on biological diversity. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
3. Rodgers WA, Panwar SH (1988) Biogeographical classification of India. New Forest, Dehra Dun.
4. Ministry of Environment and Forests (2005) State of Forest Report. Dehra Dun: Forest survey of India.
5. Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types in India. Manager Government of India Press, Nasik.
6. Reid WR (1992) How many species will there be? Tropical deforestation and species extinction. Whitmore TC, Sayer JA, editors. New York: Chapman and Hall, Chapter 3. Avaliable: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/docs/002-252a/002-252.html.
7. Venkateswaran R, Parthasarathy N (2003) Tropical dry evergreen forests on the Coromandel coast of India: Structure, composition and human disturbance. Ecotropica 9(1-2): 45-58.
8. Parthasarathy N, Selwyn MA, Udayakumar M (2008) Tropical dry evergreen forests of peninsular India: Ecology and conservation significance. Tropical Conserv Sci 1(2): 89-110.
9. National Environment Policy (2006) Ministry of Environment and Forests. New Delhi: Government of India.
10. Mace GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Phil Trans R Soc B: Biological Sciences 359: 711-719.
11. Parmentier I, Duminil J, Kuzmina M, Philippe M, Thomas DW, et al. (2013) How effective are DNA barcodes in the identification of African rainforest trees? PLoS ONE 8(4): e54921.
12. Costion C, Ford A, Cross H, Crayn D, Harrington M, et al. (2011) Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras. PLoS ONE 6: e26841.
13. Gonzalez MA, Baraloto C, Engel J, Mori SA, Pétronelli P, et al. (2009) Identification of Amazonian trees with DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 4(10): e7483.
14. Margules CR, Austin M, Mollison D, Smith F (1994) Biological models for monitoring species decline: The construction and use of data bases [and discussion]. Phil Trans R Soc B: Biological Sciences 344: 69-75.
15. de Carvalho MR, Bockmann FA, Amorim DS, Brandao CRF, de Vivo M, et al. (2005) Revisiting the taxonomic impediment. Science 307: 353.
16. Schuster SC (2008) Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nat Methods 5: 16-18.
17. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Botany 341: 335-341.
18. De Mattia F, Gentili R, Bruni I, Galimberti A, Sgorbati S, et al. (2012) A multimarker DNA barcoding approach to save time and resources in vegetation surveys. Bot J Linn Soc 169: 518-529.
19. Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, et al. (2008) From the Cover: DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 2923-2928.
20. Burgess KS, Fazekas AJ, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, Husband BC, et al. (2011) Discriminating plant species in a local temperate flora using the rbcL+ matK DNA barcode. Methods Ecol Evol 2: 333-340.
21. Thomson KA, Newmaster SG (2014) Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphologybased taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 1411-1424.
22. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biological Sciences 270: 313-321.
23. Rieseberg LH, Wood TE, Baack EJ (2006) The nature of plant species. Nature 440: 524-527.
24. Fazekas AJ, Kesanakurti PR, Burgess KS, Percy DM, Graham SW, et al. (2009) Are plant species inherently harder than animal species using DNA barcoding markers? Mol Ecol Res 9: 130-139.
25. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 8369-8374.
26. China Plant BOL Group, Li DZ, Gao LM, Li HT, Wang H, et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 19641-19646.
27. CBOL PWG, Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, et al. (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 12794-12797.
28. Hollingsworth P, Graham S, Little D (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 6: e19254.
29. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Mol Eco Resour 8: 480-490.
30. Purushothaman N, Newmaster SG, Ragupathy S, Stalin N, Suresh D, et al. (2014) A tiered barcode authentication tool to differentiate medicinal Cassia species in India. Genet Mol Res 13: 2959-2968.
31. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, et al. (2005) Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B: Biological Sciences 360: 1889-1895.
32. Tripathi AM, Tyagi A, Kumar A, Singh A, Singh S, et al. (2013) The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and trnH-psbA are suitable candidate loci for DNA barcoding of tropical tree species of India. PLoS ONE 8(2): e57934.
33. Saarela JM, Sokoloff PC, Gillespie LJ, Consaul LL, Bull RD (2013) DNA barcoding the Canadian Arctic Flora: core plastid barcodes (rbcL+matK) for 490 Vascular Plant Species. PLoS ONE 8: 36.
34. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Jones FA, Swenson NG, Perez R, et al. (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 18621-18626.
35. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Swenson NG, Thompson J, Uriarte M, et al. (2010) Advances in the use of DNA barcodes to build a community phylogeny for tropical trees in a Puerto Rican forest dynamics plot. PLoS ONE 5(11): e15409.
36. Pei N, Lian J-Y, Erickson DL, Swenson NG, Kress WJ, et al. (2011) Exploring tree-habitat associations in a Chinese subtropical forest plot using a molecular phylogeny generated from DNA Barcode Loci. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21273.
37. Meher-Homji VM (1974) On the origin of the tropical dry evergreen forest of south India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 1: 19-39.
38. SaghaiMaroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 81: 8014-8019.
39. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2: e508.
40. Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, Newmaster SG, et al. (2008). Multiple multi locus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE 3: e2802.
41. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
42. Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Peter KLN (2006) DNA Barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol 55: 715-728.
43. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-9.
44. Sarkar IN, Planet PJ, Desalle R (2008) CAOS software for use in character-based DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 1256-1259.
45. Bergmann T, Hadrys H, Breves G, Schierwater B (2009) Character-based DNA barcoding: a superior tool for species classification. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 122: 446-450.
46. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2009) MESQUITE: A modular system for evolutionary analysis (Counter website. Available: http://mesquiteproject.org.).
47. Roy S, Tyagi A, Shukla V, Kumar A, Singh UM, et al. (2010) Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: A case study with Indian Berberis Species. PLoS ONE 5(10): e13674.
48. Zhang CY, Wang FY, Yan HF, Hao G, Hu CM, et al. (2012) Testing DNA barcoding in closely related groups of Lysimachia L. (Myrsinaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 12: 98-108.
49. Maia VH, Mata CS, Franco LO, Cardoso MA, Cardoso SRS, et al. (2012) DNA barcoding Bromeliaceae: achievements and pitfalls. PLoS ONE 7(1): e29877.
50. Wang NA, Jacques FMB, Milne RI, Zhang CQ, Yang JB (2012) DNA barcoding of Nyssaceae (Cornales) and taxonomic issues. Bot Stud 53(2): 265-274.
51. Fazekas AJ, Steeves R, Newmaster SG (2010) Improving sequencing quality from PCR products containing long mononucleotide repeats. Biotechniques 48: 277-281.
52. Yu H, Wu K, Song K, Zhu Y, Yao H, et al. (2014) Expedient identification of Magnoliaceae species by DNA barcoding. POJ 7(1): 47-53.
53. Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2012) ABGD, Automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol Resour 21(8): 1864-1877.
54. Arca M, Hinsinger DD, Cruaud C, Tillier A, Bousquet J, et al. (2012) Deciduous trees and the application of universal DNA barcodes: A case study on the Circumpolar Fraxinus. PLoS ONE 7(3): e34089.
55. Pettengill JB, Neel MC (2010) An evaluation of candidate plant DNA barcodes and assignment methods in diagnosing 29 species in the genus Agalinis (Orobanchaceae). Am J Bot 97: 1391-1406.
56. Gao T, Sun Z, Yao H, Song J, Zhu Y, et al. (2011) Identification of Fabaceae plants using the DNA barcode matK. Planta Med 77: 92-94.
57. Rao RR, editor (1994) Biodiversity in India (Floristic Aspects). Dehra Dun: Bisen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
58. Ferguson JWH (2002) On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species. Biol J Linn Soc 75: 509-516.
59. Little DP, Stevenson DW (2007) A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: Examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics 23: 1-21.
60. Fazekas A, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR, Percy DM, Hajibabaei M, et al. (2008) Assessing the utility of coding and non-coding genomic regions for plant DNA barcoding. PLoS ONE 3: 1-12.
61. Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 14812-14817.
62. Kuzmina ML, Johnson KL, Barron HR, Hebert PDN (2012) Identification of the vascular plants of Churchill, Manitoba, using a DNA barcode library. BMC Ecol 12: 25.
63. Kass E, Wink M (1995) Molecular phylogeny of the Papilionoideae (Family Fabaceae): rbcL gene sequences versus chemical taxonomy. Bot Acta 108: 149-162.
64. Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen PS, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP (2001) Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Syst Bot 26(3): 487-514.
65. Simpson MG (2010) Plant systematics. Academic Press - An imprint of Elsevier.
66. Geesink R (1984) Scala Millettiearum. E. J. Brill/Leiden University Press, Leiden, The Netherlands.
67. Doyle JF, Doyle JL, Ballenger JA, Dickson EE, Kajita T, et al. (1997) A phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. Am J Bot 84(4): 541-554.
68. Lavin M, Eshbaugh E, Hu JM, Mathews S, Sharrock RA (1998) Monophyletic subgroups of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) as revealed by phytochrome nucleotide sequence data. Am J Bot 85: 412-433.
69. Chappill JA, Maslin BR (1995) A phylogenetic assessment of tribe Acacieae. In: Crisp MD, Doyle JJ, ed. Advances in legume systematic. Phylogeny Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. 77-99.
70. Sulaiman SF, Culham A, Harborne JB (2003) Molecular phylogeny of Fabaceae based on rbcL sequence data: with special emphasis on the tribe Mimoseae (Mimosoideae). Asia Pac J Mol Biol 11(1): 9-35.
71. Miller JT, Bayer RJ (2000) Molecular phylogenetics of Acacia (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) based on chloroplast trnK/matK and nuclear histone H3-D sequences. In: Herendeen PS, Bruneau A, editors. Adv Legume Syst 9. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew: London. 180-200.
72. Miller JT, Bayer RJ (2001) Molecular phylogenetics of Acacia (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) based on the chloroplast matK coding sequence and flanking trnK intron spacer region. Am J Bot 88: 697-705.
73. DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M (2005) The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Phil Trans R Soc B 360: 1905-1916.
74. Rach J, DeSalle R, Sarkar IN, Schierwater B, Hadrys H (2008) Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc R Soc Lond B 275: 237-247.
75. Lowenstein JH, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO (2009) Therealmaccoyii: identifying Tuna Sushi with DNA barcodes-contrasting characteristic attributes and genetic distances. PLoS ONE 4: e7866.
76. Kvist S, Sarkar IN, Erseus C (2010) Genetic variation and phylogeny of the cosmopolitan marine genus Tubificoides (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae: Tubificinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 57: 687-702.
77. Morejon NF, Silva VF, Astorga GJ, Stevenson DW (2011) Character-based, population-level DNA barcoding in Mexican species of Zamia L. (Zamiaceae: Cycadales). Mitochondrial DNA 21: 51-59.
78. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (2013). Appendices I, II and III. http://www.cites.org.
79. Rao RV, Hemavathi TR, Sujatha M, Chauhan L, Raturi RD (1988) Stem wood and root wood anatomy of Santalum album L. and the problem of wood adulteration in Sandal and its Products. ACIAR Proceedings No. 84. Canberra Australia. 101-110.
80. Ved DK, Goraya GS (2008) Demand and supply of medicinal plants in India (FRLHT, Bangalore). Dehra Dun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
81. Newmaster SG, GrguricM, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S (2013) DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Medicine 11: 222.