A tiered barcode authentication tool to differentiate medicinal Cassia species in India

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 2959-2968

  Purushothaman, N ^a   Newmaster, S G ^b   Ragupathy, S ^b   Stalin, N ^a   Suresh, D ^a,c   Arunraj, D R ^a   Gnanasekaran, G ^a,d   Vassou, S L ^a   Narasimhan, D ^e   Parani, M ^a  

^a SRM UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Botanical Survey of India Southern Regional Center   (India)

^e MADRAS CHRISTIAN COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Cassia; DNA barcoding; ITS2; MatK; RbcL; TrnH psbA

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASSIA; DINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; DNA BARCODING; DNA STRUCTURE; GENETIC MARKER; INDEL MUTATION; INDIA; ITS2 GENE; MATK GENE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MONONUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENE; PLANT LEAF; RBCL GENE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TRNH PSBA GENE; CHLOROPLAST; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MEDICINAL PLANT;

CHLOROPLAST DNA; GENETIC MARKER;

CASSIA; CHLOROPLASTS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; GENETIC MARKERS; INDIA; PLANTS, MEDICINAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84899145919     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/2014.April.16.4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen PS, Klitgaard BB, et al. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequence. Syst. Bot. 26: 487-514.
2. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009). A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106: 12794-12797.
3. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, et al. (2005). Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 360: 1889-1895.
4. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, Berg CVD, et al. (2007). A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56: 295-299.
5. Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, et al. (2010). Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 5: e8613.
6. China Plant BOL Group, Gao LM, Li HT, Wang H, et al. (2011). Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108: 19641-19646.
7. Cho IJ, Lee C and Ha TY (2007). Hypolipidemic effect of soluble fiber isolated from seeds of Cassia tora Linn. in rats fed a high-cholesterol diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55: 1592-1596.
8. Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress JW and Savolainen V (2006). 300 000 species to identify: problems, progress and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon 55: 611-616.
9. Devey DS, Chase MW and Clarkson JJA (2009). A stuttering start to plant DNA barcoding: microsatellites present a previously overlooked problem in non-coding plastid regions. Taxon 58: 7-15.
10. Doyle JJ, Chappill JA, Bailey CD and Kajita T (2000). Towards a Comprehensive Phylogeny of Legume: Evidence from rbcL Sequence & Non-Molecular Data. In: Advances in Legume Systematics (Herendeen PS and Bruneau A, eds.). Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew.
11. Farswan M, Mazumder PM and Percha V (2009). Protective effect of Cassia glauca Linn. on the serum glucose and hepatic enzymes level in streptozotocin induced NIDDM in rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 41: 19-22.
12. Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, et al. (2008). Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS One 3: e2802.
13. Fazekas A, Steeves R and Newmaster S (2010). Improving sequencing quality from PCR products containing long mononucleotide repeats. Biotechniques 48: 277-285.
14. Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS and Francis CM (2004). Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2: e312.
15. Irwin HS and Barneby RC (1981). Tribe Cassieae Bronn. In: Recent Advances in Legume Systematics (Polhill RM and Raven PH, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
16. Kajita T, Ohashi H, Tateishi Y, Bailey CD, et al. (2001). RbcL and legume phylogeny with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae & Allies. Syst. Bot. 26: 515-536.
17. Khare CP (2007). Indian Medicinal Plants - An Illustrated Dictionary. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
18. Kress WJ and Erickson DL (2007). A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2: e508.
19. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, et al. (2005). Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102: 8369-8374.
20. Kruskal JB (1964). Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115-129.
21. Levin RA, Wagner WL, Hoch PC, Nepokroeff M, et al. (2003). Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. Am. J. Bot. 90: 107-115.
22. Li CP, Yu ZG, Han GS and Chu KH (2012). Analyzing multi-locus plant barcoding datasets with a composition vector method based on adjustable weighted distance. PLoS One 7: e42154.
23. Little DP and Stevenson DW (2007). A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Ladistics 23: 1-21.
24. Lloyd DG and Calder VL (1991). Multi-residue gap, a class of molecular characters with exceptional reliability for phylogenetic analyses. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 9-21.
25. Mabberley DJ (2005). The Plant Book, A Portable Dictionary of Vascular Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ and Ragupathy S (2006). DNA barcoding in the land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Can. J. Bot. 84: 335-341.
27. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RA and Janovec J (2008). Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8: 480-490.
28. Primer Software (2002). Primer Multivariate Software Version 5.2.9. PRIMER-E Ltd. Hedingham Gardens, Roborough Plymouth.
29. R Core Team. R version 2.15.1. (2012). A Language and Environment for Statistical. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
30. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA and Allard RW (1984). Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81: 8014-8018.
31. Shinde D, Lai Y, Sun F and Arnheim N (2003). Taq DNA polymerase slippage mutation rates measured by PCR and quasi-likelihood analysis: (CA/GT)n and (A/T)n microsatellites. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 974-980.
32. Singh V (2001). Monograph on Indian Subtribe Cassiinae (Caesalpiniaceae). Scientific Publisher, Jodhpur.
33. Srirama R, Senthilkumar U, Sreejayan N, Ravikanth G, et al. (2010). Assessing species admixtures in raw drug trade of Phyllanthus, a hepato-protective plant using molecular tools. J. Ethnopharmacol. 130: 208-215.
34. Sui XY, Huang Y, Tan Y, Guo Y, et al. (2011). Molecular authentication of the ethnomedicinal plant Sabia parviflora and its adulterants by DNA barcoding technique. Planta Med. 77: 492-496.
35. Van Dijk MA, Paradis E, Catzeflis F and de Jong WW (1999). The virtues of gaps: Xenarthra (Edentata) monophyly supported by a unique deletion in alpha A-crystallin. Syst. Biol. 48: 94-106.
36. Ved DK and Goraya GS (2007). Demand and supply of medicinal plants in India. National Medicinal Plants Board/ Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT), Bangalore.
37. Yao H, Song JY, Ma XY, Liu C, et al. (2009). Identification of Dendrobium species by a candidate DNA barcode sequence: the chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic region. Planta Med. 75: 667-669.
38. Zuo Y, Chen Z, Kondo K, Funamoto T, et al. (2011). DNA barcoding of Panax species. Planta Med. 77: 182-187.