Erratum: The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region and trnH-psbA are suitable candidate loci for DNA barcoding of tropical tree species of India (PLoS ONE (2013) 8, 2 (e57934) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057934);The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Region and trnhH-psbA Are Suitable Candidate Loci for DNA Barcoding of Tropical Tree Species of India

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Tripathi, Abhinandan Mani ^a   Tyagi, Antariksh ^a   Kumar, Anoop ^a   Singh, Akanksha ^a   Singh, Shivani ^a   Chaudhary, Lal Babu ^a   Roy, Sribash ^a  

^a CSIR NATIONAL BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER 2;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BARCODING; DNA STRUCTURE; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; INDIA; MATK GENE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RBCL GENE; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; STANDARD; TREE; TRNHH PSBA GENE; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

EID: 84874534084     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105914     Document Type: Erratum

References (77)

1. Hubbell S, He F, Condit R, Borda-de-A gua L, Kellner J, et al. (2008) How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11498-11504.
2. Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG Jr, Chave J, Terborgh J, et al. (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295: 666-669.
3. Gentry AH, (1988) Tree species richness of upper Amazonian forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 156-159.
4. ter Steege H, Pitman NC, Phillips OL, Chave J, Sabatier D, et al. (2006) Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 443: 444-447.
5. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M, (2003) Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299: 241-244.
6. Gonzalez MA, Baraloto C, Engel J, Mori SA, Petronelli P, et al. (2009) Identification of Amazonian trees with DNA barcodes. PLoS One 4: e7483.
7. Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, et al. (2008) DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 2923-2928.
8. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J, (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Mole Ecol Resour 8: 480-490.
9. Maia VH, Mata CS, Franco LO, Cardoso MA, Cardoso SR, et al. (2012) DNA barcoding Bromeliaceae: achievements and pitfalls. PLoS One 7: e29877.
10. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR, (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Philos Trans, Ser B 270: 313-321.
11. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM, (2004) Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol 2: e312.
12. Moritz C, Cicero C, (2004) DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol 2: e354.
13. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 12794-12797.
14. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, Van den Berg C, Madrinan S, et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56: 295-299.
15. Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD, (2006) DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 3657-3662.
16. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD, (2005) DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360: 1847-1857.
17. Seifert KA, Samson RA, Dewaard JR, Houbraken J, Levesque CA, et al. (2007) Prospects for fungus identification using CO1 DNA barcodes, with Penicillium as a test case. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3901-3906.
18. Evans KM, Wortley AH, Mann DG, (2007) An assessment of potential diatom "barcode" genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). Protist 158: 349-364.
19. Robba L, Russell SJ, Barker GL, Brodie J, (2006) Assessing the use of the mitochondrial cox1 marker for use in DNA barcoding of red algae (Rhodophyta). Am J Bot 93: 1101-1108.
20. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, et al. (2005) Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360: 1889-1895.
21. Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, Newmaster SG, et al. (2008) Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE 3: e2802.
22. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH, (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8369-8374.
23. Mower JP, Touzet P, Gummow JS, Delph LF, Palmer JD, (2007) Extensive variation in synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial genes of seed plants. BMC Evol Biol 7: 135.
24. Edwards D, Horn A, Taylor D, Savolainen V, Hawkins J, (2008) DNA barcoding of a large genus, Aspalathus L. (Fabaceae). Taxon 57: 1317-1327.
25. Roy S, Tyagi A, Shukla V, Kumar A, Singh UM, et al. (2010) Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: a case study with Indian Berberis species. PLoS One 5: e13674.
26. Spooner DM, (2009) DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 1177-1189.
27. Starr JR, Naczi RFC, Chouinard BN, (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and species resolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 9: 151-163.
28. de Groot GA, During HJ, Maas JW, Schneider H, Vogel JC, et al. (2011) Use of rbcL and trnL-F as a two-locus DNA barcode for identification of NW-European ferns: an ecological perspective. PLoS One 6: e16371.
29. de Vere N, Rich TC, Ford CR, Trinder SA, Long C, et al. (2012) DNA barcoding the native flowering plants and conifers of Wales. PLoS One 7: e37945.
30. Ebihara A, Nitta JH, Ito M, (2010) Molecular species identification with rich floristic sampling: DNA barcoding the pteridophyte flora of Japan. PLoS One 5: e15136.
31. Gao T, Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Zhu Y,et al. (2010) Identification of medicinal plants in the family Fabaceae using a potential DNA barcode ITS2. J Ethnopharmacol.
32. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Jones FA, Swenson NG, Perez R, et al. (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18621-18626.
33. Li DZ, Gao LM, Li HT, Wang H, Ge XJ, et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 19641-19646.
34. Wang W, Wu Y, Yan Y, Ermakova M, Kerstetter R, et al. (2010) DNA barcoding of the Lemnaceae, a family of aquatic monocots. BMC Plant Biol 10: 205.
35. Gu J, Su JX, Lin RZ, Li RQ, PG X, (2011) Testing four proposed barcoding markers for the identification of species within Ligustrum L. (Oleaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49: 213-224.
36. Arca M, Hinsinger DD, Cruaud C, Tillier A, Bousquet J, et al. (2012) Deciduous trees and the application of universal DNA barcodes: a case study on the circumpolar Fraxinus. PLoS One 7: e34089.
37. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2: e508.
38. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP, (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS One 6: e19254.
39. Piredda R SM, Attimonelli M, Bellarosa R, Schirone B, (2011) Prospects of barcoding the Italian wild dendroflora: oaks reveal severe limitations to tracking species identity. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 72-83.
40. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD, (2007) DNA barcoding in the Cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species identification of cycads. PLoS ONE 2: e1154.
41. Hollingsworth PM, (2011) Refining the DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 19451-19452.
42. Muellner AN, Schaefer H, Lahaye R, (2010) Evaluation of candidate DNA barcoding loci for economically important timber species of the mahogany family (Meliaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 11: 450-460.
43. Singh HK, Parveen I, Raghuvanshi S, Babbar SB, (2012) The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species. BMC Res Notes 5: 42.
44. Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, et al. (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 5: e8613.
45. Pang X, Luo H, Sun C Assessing the potential of candidate DNA barcodes for identifying non-flowering seed plants. Plant Biol (Stuttg).
46. Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Luo K, Han J,et al. (2010) Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals. PLoS One 5.
47. Borek K, S S (2009) DNA barcoding of Quercus sp. at Pierce Cedar Creek Institue using the matK gene. Grand Rapids: Aquinas College.
48. Wang Y, Tao X, Liu H, Chen X, Y Q, (2009) A two-locus chloroplast (cp) DNA barcode for indetification of different species in Eucalyptus. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 36: 1651-1658.
49. Coley P, Barone J, (1996) Herbivory and plant defences in tropical forests. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27: 305-335.
50. Smith SA, Donoghue MJ, (2008) Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322: 86-89.
51. Rao RR, editor (1994) Biodiversity in India (Floristic Aspects). Dehra Dun: Bisen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
52. Hollingsworth PM, Andra Clark A, Forrest LL, Richardson J, Pennington RT, et al. (2009) Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 439-457.
53. Devey DS, Chase MW, Clarkson JJ, (2009) A stuttering start to plant DNA barcoding: microsatellites present a previously overlooked problem in noncoding plastid regions. Taxon 58: 7-15.
54. Luo K, Chen SL, Chen KL, Song JY, Yao H, (2010) Assessment of candidate plant DNA barcodes using the Rutaceae family. Science China-Life Sciences 53: 701708.
55. Pang X SJ, Zhu Y, Xu H, Huang L, et al. (2010) Applying plant DNA barcodes for Rosaceae species identification. Cladistics 27: 165-170.
56. Liu J, Michael M, Gao L, Zhang D, Zhu L, (2011) DNAbarcoding for the discrimination of Eurasian yews (Taxus L., Taxaceae) and the discovery of cryptic species. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 89-100.
57. Desalle R, (2007) Phenetic and DNA taxonomy; a comment on Waugh. Bioessays 29: 1289-1290.
58. Waugh J, (2007) DNA barcoding in animal species: progress, potential and pitfalls. Bioessays 29: 188-197.
59. Alvarez I, Wendel JF, (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29: 417-434.
60. Campbell CS, Wright WA, Cox M, Vining TF, Major CS, et al. (2005) Nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) in Picea (Pinaceae): sequence divergence and structure. Mol Phylogenet Evol 35: 165-185.
61. Jobes DV, Thien LB, (1997) A Conserved Motif in the 5.8S Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) Geneisa Useful Diagnostic Marker for Plant Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Sequences. Plant Mol Biol Report 15: 326-334.
62. Pang X, Song J, Zhu Y, Xie C, Chen S, (2010) Using DNA barcoding to identify species within Euphorbiaceae. Planta Med 76: 1784-1786.
63. Gao T, Yao H, Song J, Zhu Y, Liu C, et al. (2010) Evaluating the feasibility of using candidate DNA barcodes in discriminating species of the large Asteraceae family. BMC Evol Biol 10: 324.
64. Sun XQ, Zhu YJ, Guo JL, Peng B, Bai MM,et al. DNA barcoding the Dioscorea in China, a vital group in the evolution of monocotyledon: use of matK gene for species discrimination. PLoS One 7: e32057.
65. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Raghupathy S, (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tired approach. Can J Bot 84: 335-341.
66. Van de Wiel CCM, Van Der Schoot J, Van Valkenburg JLCH, Duistermaat H, Smulders MJM, (2009) DNA barcoding discriminates the noxious invasive plant species, floating pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides L.f.),from non-invasive relatives. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 1086-1091.
67. Newmaster SG, Ragupathy S, (2009) Testing plant barcoding in a sister species complex of pantropical Acacia (Mimosoideae, Fabaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 9: 172-180.
68. Ragupathy S, Newmaster SG, Murugesan M, V B, (2009) DNA barcoding discriminates a new cryptic grass species revealed in an ethnobotany study by the hill tribes of the Western Ghats in southern India. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 164-171.
69. Coley P, Barone J, (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27: 305-335.
70. Le Clerc-Blain J, Starr JR, Bull RD, Saarela JM, (2010) A regional approach to plant DNA barcoding provides high species resolution of sedges (Carex and Kobresia, Cyperaceae) in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 69-91.
71. Mort ME, Crawford DJ, Archibald JK, O'Leary TR, Santos-Guerra A, (2010) Plant DNA barcoding: A test using Macaronesian taxa of Tolpis (Asteraceae). Taxon 59: 581-587.
72. Blaxter M, Maan J, Chapman T, Thomas F, Whitton C, et al. (2005) Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Phil Trans Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 360: 1935-1943.
73. Kelly L, Ameka G, Chase M, (2010) DNA barcoding of African Podostemaceae (river-weeds): A test of proposed barcode regions. Taxon 59: 251-260.
74. van Velzen R, Weitschek E, Felici G, Bakker FT DNA barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods. PLoS One 7: e30490.
75. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739.
76. Austerlitz F, David O, Schaeffer B, Bleakley K, Olteanu M, et al. (2009) DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methods. BMC Bioinformatics 10Suppl 14: S10.
77. Ball SL, Hebert PDN, Burian SK, Webb JM, (2005) Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes. J North Ame Benthol Soc 24: 508-524.