Ecological Success of a Group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the Northern European wine-making environment

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 3256-3265

  Erny, C ^a   Raoult, P ^b,c   Alais, A ^b,c   Butterlin, G ^b,c   Delobel, P ^d,e,f   Matei Radoi, F ^g   Casaregola, S ^h   Legras, J L ^d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE HAUTE ALSACE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d SPO   (France)

^e MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^f UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF AGRONOMIC SCIENCES AND VETERINARY MEDICINE OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

^h UMR1319 MICALIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOL CLIMATES; DNA CONTENT; GENETIC DISTANCES; GEOGRAPHIC AREAS; GERMANY; HUNGARY; INDUSTRIAL YEAST; MICROSATELLITE LOCI; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; PLOIDY LEVELS; REPRESENTATIVE STRAIN; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; S.CEREVISIAE; SPECIFIC ADAPTATIONS; WINE FERMENTATION; WINE MAKING; WINE YEAST; YEAST STRAIN;

DNA SEQUENCES; FERMENTATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENES; YEAST;

WINE;

FUNGAL DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

BREWING INDUSTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; FERMENTATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIVERSITY; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHIMERA; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FRANCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GERMANY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUNGARY; METABOLISM; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SACCHAROMYCES; UNITED STATES; WINE;

CHIMERA; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA, FUNGAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FRANCE; GENETIC VARIATION; GERMANY; HUNGARY; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; UNITED STATES; WINE;

FRANCE; GERMANY; HUNGARY; UNITED STATES;

QUERCUS; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII;

EID: 84861123860     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06752-11     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arroyo-López FN, Orlić S, Querol A, Barrio E. 2009. Effects of temperature, pH, and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii, and their interspecific hybrid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 131:120-127.
2. Belloch C, Orlic S, Barrio E, Querol A. 2008. Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 122:188-195.
3. Belloch C, et al. 2009. Chimeric genomes of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:2534-2544.
4. Bond U. 2009. The genomes of lager yeasts. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 69: 159-182.
5. Bond U, Neal C, Donnelly D, James TC. 2004. Aneuploidy and copy number breakpoints in the genome of lager yeasts mapped by microarray hybridisation. Curr. Genet. 45:360-370.
6. Borneman AR, et al. 2011. The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res. 12:88-96.
7. Bradbury JE, et al. 2006. A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 89:27-37.
8. Budroni M, Zara S, Zara G, Pirino G, Mannazzu I. 2005. Peculiarities of flor strains adapted to Sardinian sherry-like wine ageing conditions. FEMS Yeast Res. 5:951-958.
9. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550-570.
10. Demuyter C, Lollier M, Legras JL, Le Jeune C. 2004. Predominance of Saccharomyces uvarum during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation, for three consecutive years, in an Alsatian winery. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97: 1140-1148.
11. Dieringer D, Schlotterer C. 2003. Microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Mol. Ecol. Notes 3:167-169.
12. Diezmann S, Dietrich FS. 2009. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: population divergence and resistance to oxidative stress in clinical, domesticated, and wild isolates. PLoS One 4:e5317.
13. Divol B, Miot-Sertier C, Lonvaud-Funel A. 2006. Genetic characterization of strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae responsible for "refermentation" in botrytis-affected wines. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100:516-526.
14. Doniger SW, et al. 2008. A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000183.
15. Dunn B, Sherlock G. 2008. Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res. 18:1610-1623.
16. Esteve-Zarzoso B, Belloch C, Uruburu F, Querol A. 1999. Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49(Pt 1):329-337.
17. Ezov TK, et al. 2006. Molecular-genetic biodiversity in a natural population of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae from "Evolution Canyon": microsatellite polymorphism, ploidy, and controversial sexual status. Genetics 174:1455-1468.
18. Giudici P, Caggia C, Pulvirenti A, Rainieri S. 1998. Karyotyping of Saccharomyces strains with different temperature profiles. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:811-819.
19. Goldstein DB, Linares AR, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW. 1995. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:6723-6727.
20. Gonçalves P, Valério E, Correia C, de Almeida JM, Sampaio JP. 2011. Evidence for divergent evolution of growth temperature preference in sympatric Saccharomyces species. PLoS One 6:e20739.
21. González SS, Barrio E, Gafner J, Querol A. 2006. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus, and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res. 6:1221-1234.
22. González SS, Barrio E, Querol A. 2008. Molecular characterization of new natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii in brewing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2314-2320.
23. Haase SB, Reed SI. 2002. Improved flow cytometric analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 1:132-136.
24. Haasl RJ, Payseur B. 2011. Multi-locus inference of population structure: a comparison between single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites. Heredity 106:158-171.
25. Heinrich AJ. 2006. Identification of genomic differences between laboratory and commercial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ph.D. thesis. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
26. Hittinger CT, et al. 2010. Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 464:54-58.
27. Hittinger CT, Rokas A, Carroll SB. 2004. Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:14144-14149.
28. Huelsenbeck JP, Andolfatto P. 2007. Inference of population structure under a Dirichlet process model. Genetics 175:1787-1802.
29. Reference deleted.
30. Johnson LJ, et al. 2004. Population genetics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics 166:43-52.
31. Kodama Y, Kielland-Brandt M, Hansen J. 2006. Lager brewing yeast, p 145-164. In Sunnerhagen P, Piskur P (ed), Topics in current genetics, vol Springer, Berlin, Germany.
32. Legras JL, Karst F. 2003. Optimisation of interdelta analysis for Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain characterisation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 221:249-255.
33. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J-M, Karst F. 2007. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol. Ecol. 16:2091-2102.
34. Legras JL, Ruh O, Merdinoglu D, Karst F. 2005. Selection of hypervariable microsatellite loci for the characterization of strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 102:73-83. 33a.
35. Le Jeune C, et al. 2007. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum. FEMS Yeast Res. 7:540-549.
36. Libkind D, et al. 2011. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:14539-14544.
37. Liti G, Barton DBH, Louis EJ. 2006. Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation, and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics 174:839-850.
38. Liti G, Peruffo A, James SA, Roberts IN, Louis EJ. 2005. Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR retrotransposons and telomeric-associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Yeast 22:177-192.
39. Lopandic K, et al. 2007. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res. 7:953-965.
40. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446:279-283.
41. Mallet J. 2008. Hybridization, ecological races, and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363:2971-2986.
42. Masneuf I, Hansen J, Groth C, Piskur J, Dubourdieu D. 1998. New hybrids between Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3887-3892.
43. McGovern PE, et al. 2004. Fermented beverages of pre- and protohistoric China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:17593-17598.
44. Muller LAH, McCusker JH. 2009. A multispecies-based taxonomic microarray reveals interspecies hybridization and introgression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:143-152.
45. Nakao Y, et al. 2009. Genome sequence of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Res. 16:115-129.
46. Naumov GI, James SA, Naumova ES, Louis EJ, Roberts IN. 2000. Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii, and Saccharomyces mikatae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50(Pt 5):1931-1942.
47. Nguyen H-V, Legras J-L, Neuvéglise C, Gaillardin C. 2011. Deciphering the hybridisation history leading to the lager lineage based on the mosaic genomes of Saccharomyces bayanus strains NBRC1948 and CBS380T. PLoS One 6:e25821.
48. Peccoud J, Ollivier A, Plantegenest M, Simon J-C. 2009. A continuum of genetic divergence from sympatric host races to species in the pea aphid complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:7495-7500.
49. Pedersen MB. 1985. DNA sequence polymorphisms in the genus Saccharomyces. II. Analysis of the genes RDN1, HIS4, LEU2 and Ty transposable elements in Carlsberg, Tuborg, and 22 Bavarian brewing strains. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 50:262-272.
50. Pérez-Ortín JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E. 2002. Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res. 12:1533-1539.
51. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
52. Querol A, Bond U. 2009. The complex and dynamic genomes of industrial yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 293:1-10.
53. Rainieri S, et al. 2006. Pure and mixed genetic lines of Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces pastorianus and their contribution to the lager brewing strain genome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:3968-3974.
54. Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. 2008. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2144-2152.
55. Sipiczki M. 2008. Interspecies hybridization and recombination in Saccharomyces wine yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:996-1007.
56. St Charles J, Hamilton ML, Petes TD. 2010. Meiotic chromosome segregation in triploid strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 186: 537-550.
57. Wei W, et al. 2007. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:12825-12830.
58. Winzeler EA. 2008. Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 281:1194-1197.