Implementation intentions during multimedia learning: Using if-then plans to facilitate cognitive processing

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-15

  Stalbovs, Kim ^a   Scheiter, Katharina ^a   Gerjets, Peter ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Eye tracking; Implementation intentions; Learning with text and pictures; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907452359     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abelson R.P., Prentice D.A. Contrast tests of interaction hypothesis. Psychological Methods 1997, 2:315-328. 10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.315.
2. Achtziger A., Gollwitzer P.M., Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:381-393. 10.1177/0146167207311201.
3. Ajzen I., Czasch C., Flood M.G. From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2009, 39:1356-1372. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00485.x.
4. Anglin G.J., Vaez H., Cunningham K.L. Visual representations and learning: the role of static and animated graphics. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology 2004, Vol. 2:865-916. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Bartholomé T., Bromme R. Coherence formation when learning from text and pictures: what kind of support for whom?. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:282-293. 10.1037/a0014312.
6. Bayer U.C., Gollwitzer P.M. Boosting scholastic test scores by willpower: the role of implementation intentions. Self and Identity 2007, 6:1-19. 10.1080/15298860600662056.
7. Brandstätter V., Lengfelder A., Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:946-960. 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.946.
8. De Koning B.B., Tabbers H.K., Rikers R.M.J.P., Paas F. Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review 2009, 21:113-140. 10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7.
9. De Vet E., Oenema A., Brug J. More or better: do the number and specificity of implementation intentions matter in increasing physical activity?. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2011, 12:471-477. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.02.008.
10. Dewitte S., Verguts T., Lens W. Implementation intentions do not enhance all types of goals: the moderating role of goal difficulty. Current Psychology 2003, 22:73-89. 10.1007/s12144-003-1014-6.
11. Eitel A., Scheiter K., Schüler A. How inspecting a picture affects processing of text in multimedia learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013, 10.1002/acp.2922.
12. Eitel A., Scheiter K., Schüler A., Nyström M., Holmqvist K. How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction 2013, 28:48-63.
13. Fletcher J.D., Tobias S. The multimedia principle. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 117-133. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
14. Flores F., Tovar M.E., Gallegos L. Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: an integrated view. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25:269-286.
15. Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist 1999, 54:493-503.
16. Gollwitzer P.M., Brandstätter V. Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:186-199.
17. Gollwitzer P.M., Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in experimental social psychology 2006, Vol. 38:69-119. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1.
18. Hannus M., Hyönä J. Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. ContemporaryEducational Psychology 1999, 24:95-123. 10.1006/ceps.1998.0987.
19. Hegarty M. Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18(5):1084-1102.
20. Hegarty M., Just M.A. Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:717-742. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1036.
21. Hegarty M., Sims V.K. Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:411-430.
22. Horz H., Winter C., Fries S. Differential benefits of situated instructional prompts. Computers in Human Behavior 2009, 25:818-828. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.001.
23. Hyönä J., Lorch R.F., Kaakinen J.K. Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology 2002, 94(1):44-55. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.44.
24. Johnson C.I., Mayer R.E. An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2012, 18:178-191. 10.1037/a0026923.
25. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. Atheory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87:329-354. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329.
26. Koestner R., Lekes N., Powers T.A., Chicoine E. Attaining personal goals: self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:231-244. 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.231.
27. Kombartzky U., Plötzner R., Schlag S., Metz B. Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:424-433. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.002.
28. Laugksch R.C., Spargo P.E. Construction of a paper-and-pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Public Understanding of Science 1996, 5:331-359. 10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/003.
29. Lewis J., Leach J., Wood-Robinson C. Chromosomes: the missing link- young people's understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation. Journal of Biological Education 2000, 34:189-199.
30. Mason L., Tornatora M.C., Pluchino P. Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education 2013, 60:95-109. 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011.
31. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
32. Mayer R.E., Moreno R. Asplit-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90(2):312-320. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312.
33. McNamara D.S., Levinstein I.B., Boonthum C. iSTART: interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36(2):222-233. 10.3758/BF03195567.
34. Merriënboer J.J.G., Sluijsmans D.M.A. Toward a synthesis of cognitive load theory, four-component instructional design, and self-directed learning. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 21:55-66. 10.1007/s10648-008-9092-5.
35. Oettingen G., Hönig G., Gollwitzer P.M. Effective self-regulation of goal attainment. International Journal of Educational Research 2000, 33:705-732. 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00046-X.
36. O'Shea L.J., Sindelar P.T., O'Shea D.J. The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research 1985, 17:129-142.
37. Parks-Stamm E.J., Gollwitzer P.M., Oettingen G. Action control by implementation intentions: effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition 2007, 25(2):248-266. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248.
38. Sanchez R.P., Lorch E.P., Lorch R.F. Effects of headings on text processing strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2001, 26:418-428. 10.1006/ceps.2000.1056.
39. Scheiter K., Eitel A. The effects of signals on learning from text and diagrams: how looking at diagrams earlier and more frequently improves understanding. Diagrammatic representation and inference 2010, 264-270. Springer, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_26. A.K. Goel, M. Jamnik, N.H. Narayanan (Eds.).
40. Scheiter K., Gerjets P., Huk T., Imhof B., Kammerer Y. The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:481-494.
41. Scheiter K., Schüler A., Gerjets P., Huk T., Hesse F.W. Extending multimedia research: how do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures. Computers in Human Behavior 2014, 31:73-84.
42. Scheiter K., Van Gog T. Using eye tracking in applied research to study and stimulate the processing of information from multi-representational sources. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009, 23:1209-1214. 10.1002/acp.1524.
43. Schlag S., Plötzner R. Supporting learning from illustrated texts: conceptualizing and evaluating a learning strategy. Instructional Science 2011, 39:921-937.
44. Schmidt-Weigand F., Kohnert A., Glowalla U. Acloser look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:100-110. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011.
45. Schmidt-Weigand F., Kohnert A., Glowalla U. Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: new insights from investigating students' viewing behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010, 24:226-237. 10.1002/acp.1554.
46. Schnotz W. An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 49-69. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
47. Schüler A., Scheiter K., Gerjets P. Is spoken text always better? Investigating the modality and redundancy effect with longer text presentation. Computers in Human Behavior 2013, 29:1590-1601.
48. Seufert T. Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13:227-237. 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00022-1.
49. Seufert T., Brünken R. Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006, 20:321-331. 10.1002/acp.1248.
50. Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology 2002, 12:1-36. 10.1080/14792772143000003.
51. Thiede K.W., Anderson M.C.M., Therriault D. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003, 95:66-73. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66.
52. Thillmann H., Künsting J., Wirth J., Leutner D. Is it merely a question of "what" to prompt or also "when" to prompt?. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2009, 23:105-115. 10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.105.
53. Van Gog T., Scheiter K. Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:95-99. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009.
54. Veenman M.V.J., Hout-Wolters B.H.A.M., Afflerbach P. Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning 2006, 1:3-14. 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
55. Walczyk J.J., Marsiglia C.S., Johns A.K., Bryan K.S. Children's compensations for poorly automated reading skills. Discourse Processes 2004, 37:47-66. 10.1207/s15326950dp3701_3.
56. Webb T.L., Sheeran P. Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. The British Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 47:373-395. 10.1348/014466607X267010.
57. Weinstein C.E., Mayer R.E. The teaching of learning strategies. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, Vol. 3:315-327. Macmillan, New York, NY. 3rd ed.
58. Wieber F., Von Suchodoletz A., Heikamp T., Trommsdorff G., Gollwitzer P.M. If-then planning helps school-aged children to ignore attractive distractions. Social Psychology 2011, 42:39-47. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000041.
59. Zwaan R., Singer M. Text comprehension. Handbook of discourse processes 2003, 83-121. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. A.C. Graesser, M.A. Gernsbacher, S.R. Goldman (Eds.).