The geographical dimension of innovation collaboration: Networking and innovation in Norway

Urban Studies

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2572-2595

  Fitjar, Rune Dahl ^a   Rodríguez Pose, Andrés ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

firm networking; firms; interaction; managers; Norway; partnerships; regions

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE STRATEGY; EXPENDITURE; GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION; INNOVATION; NETWORKING; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; SOCIAL CAPITAL;

NORWAY;

EID: 84907148942     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013510567     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Amin A,Cohendet PArchitectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004
2. Arndt O,Sternberg R.Do manufacturing firms profit from intraregional innovation linkages? An empirical based answer.European Planning Studies. 2000;18 (4): 465-485
3. Asheim B,Isaksen A.Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge.Journal of Technology Transfer. 2002;27 (1): 77-86
4. Asheim B,Coenen L,Vang J.Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2007;25 (5): 655-670
5. Barney JB.Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?.Academy of Management Review. 1986;11 (3): 656-665
6. Bathelt H.Buzz-and-pipeline dynamics: Towards a knowledge-based multiplier model of clusters.Geography Compass. 2007;1:1282-1298
7. Bathelt H,Schuldt N.International trade fairs and global buzz, part I: Ecology of global buzz.European Planning Studies. 2010;18:1957-1974
8. Bathelt H,Malmberg A,Maskell P.Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation.Progress in Human Geography. 2004;28:31-56
9. Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale. Becattini G, ed. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987
10. Bellandi M.Innovation and change in the Marshallian industrial district.European Planning Studies. 1996;4:357-368
11. BerliantMFujitaM (2012) Culture and diversity in knowledge creation. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 36996.
12. Bishop K,D’Este P,Neely A.Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity.Research Policy. 2011;40:30-40
13. Boschma RA.Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment.Regional Studies. 2005;39 (1): 61-74
14. Bunnell T,Coe N.Spaces and scales of innovation.Progress in Human Geography. 2001;25:569-589
15. Chaminade C,Vang J.Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation policy: Supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry.Research Policy. 2008;37:1684-1696
16. Coleman JS.Social capital in the creation of human capital.American Journal of Sociology. 1988;94:95-120
17. Cooke PKnowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. London: Routledge; 2002
18. Cooke P,Morgan KThe Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998
19. D’Este P,Guy F,Iammarino S.Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter?.Journal of Economic Geography. 2013;13 (4): 537-558
20. de Jong JPJ,Freel M.Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms.Research Policy. 2010;39 (1): 47-54
21. Döring T,Schnellenbach J.What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature.Regional Studies. 2006;40 (3): 375-395
22. Duranton G,Puga D.Diversity and specialisation in cities: Why, where and when does it matter?.Urban Studies. 2000;37 (3): 533-555
23. Ebersberger B,Herstad SJ.Go abroad or have strangers visit? On organizational search spaces and local linkages.Journal of Economic Geography. 2012;12 (1): 273-295
24. Etzkowitz H,Leydesdorff L.The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations.Research Policy. 2000;29:109-123
25. Etzkowitz H.Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations.Social Science Information. 2003;42:293-337
26. Fitjar RD,Rodríguez-Pose A.When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway.Environment and Planning A. 2011;43 (6): 1248-1267
27. Florida R,Mellander C,Stolarick K.Inside the black box of regional development: Human capital, the creative class and tolerance.Journal of Economic Geography. 2008;8 (5): 615-649
28. Fritsch M.Does R&D cooperation behavior differ between regions?.Industry and Innovation. 2003;10 (1): 25-39
29. Fritsch M,Lukas R.Who cooperates on R&D?.Research Policy. 2001;30:297-312
30. Fritsch M,Slavtchev V.Determinants of the efficiency of regional innovation systems.Regional Studies. 2011;45:905-918
31. Gertler M,Levitte YM.Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation.Industry and Innovation. 2005;12 (4): 487-507
32. Glaeser EL.Learning in cities.Journal of Urban Economics. 1999;46 (2): 254-277
33. Glaeser EL,Gottlieb JD.Urban resurgence and the consumer city.Urban Studies. 2006;43 (8): 1275-1299
34. Glaeser E,Kallal H,Scheinkman J, et al.Growth in cities.Journal of Political Economy. 1992;100:1126-1152
35. Glasmeier AK,Fuellhart K,Feller I, et al.The relevance of firm-learning theories to the design and evaluation of manufacturing modernization programs.Economic Development Quarterly. 1998;12 (2): 107-124
36. Godin B,Gingras Y.The place of universities in the system of knowledge production.Research Policy. 2000;29:273-278
37. Henderson JVMarshall’s economies. National Bureau of Economic Research; 1999
38. Herstad S,Pålshaugen Ø,Ebersberger B.Industrial innovation collaboration in a capital region context.Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2011;2 (4): 507-532
39. Hofstede G.The interaction between national and organizational value systems.Journal of Management Studies. 1985;22:347-357
40. Inglehart R,Norris PRising Tide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003
41. Johanson J,Vahlne J-E.The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments.Journal of International Business Studies. 1977;8:23-32
42. Kaiser HF.The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20:141-151
43. Kickul J,Gundry LK.Prospecting for strategic advantage: The proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation.Journal of Small Business Management. 2002;40 (2): 85-97
44. Knight GA,Cavusgil ST.Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm.Journal of International Business Studies. 2004;35:124-141
45. Laursen K,Reichstein T,Salter A.Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom.Regional Studies. 2011;45 (4): 507-523
46. Leknes ENorske byregioner: Utviklingstrekk og styringsutfordringer. Farsund AALeknes E, ed. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget; 2010:55-93.
47. Leydesdorff L.The triple helix: An evolutionary model of innovations.Research Policy. 2000;29:243-255
48. Leydesdorff L,Fritsch M.Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics.Research Policy. 2006;35:1538-1553
49. Leydesdorff L,Dolfsma W,Van der Panne G.Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple helix relations among ‘technology, organization, and territory’.Research Policy. 2006;35:181-199
50. Lorenzen M.Social capital and localised learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics.Urban Studies. 2007;44:799-817
51. Lumpkin GT,Dess GG.Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance.Academy of Management Review. 1996;21:135-172
52. Lundvall B-ÅNational Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter; 1992
53. Lundvall B-Å,Borrás SThe Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1999
54. Lundvall B-Å,Johnson B.The learning economy.Journal of Industry Studies. 1994;1 (2): 23-42
55. Malecki EJ.Everywhere? The geography of knowledge.Journal of Regional Science. 2010;50:493-513
56. Malecki EJ,Poehling RM.Extroverts and introverts: Small manufacturers and their information sources.Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 1999;11 (3): 247-268
57. Maskell P,Bathelt H,Malmberg A.Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters.European Planning Studies. 2006;14:997-1013
58. Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development (2003) Greater Cities Report: On the Development of Greater City Policies. Norwegian Government White Paper No. 31, 2002–2003.
59. Moodysson J.Principles and practices of knowledge creation: On the organization of ‘buzz’ and ‘pipelines’ in life science communities.Economic Geography. 2008;84:449-469
60. Morgan K.The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal.Regional Studies. 1997;31:491-504
61. Ottaviano GIP,Peri G.Cities and culture.Journal of Urban Economics. 2005;58:304-337
62. Oviatt BM,McDougall PP.Toward a theory of international new ventures.Journal of International Business Studies. 1994;25:45-64
63. Putnam RDMaking Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1993
64. Rallet A,Torre A.Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy?.GeoJournal. 2000;49:373-380
65. Rodríguez-Pose A.Innovation prone and innovation averse societies. Economic performance in Europe.Growth and Change. 1999;30:75-105
66. Rosenthal S,Strange WC.The attenuation of human capital spillovers.Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;64:373-389
67. Schuldt N,Bathelt H.International trade fairs and global buzz. Part II: Practices of global buzz.European Planning Studies. 2011;19:1-22
68. Shearmur R.Space, place and innovation: A distance-based approach.The Canadian Geographer. 2010;54 (1): 46-67
69. Sonn JW,Storper M.The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997.Environment and Planning A. 2008;40 (5): 1020-1039
70. Sternberg R,Arndt O.The firm or the region: What determines the innovation behaviour of European firms?.Economic Geography. 2001;77 (4): 364-382
71. Storper M,Venables AJ.Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy.Journal of Economic Geography. 2004;4 (4): 351-370
72. Teirlinck P,Spithoven A.The spatial organization of innovation: Open innovation, external knowledge relations and urban structure.Regional Studies. 2008;42 (5): 689-704
73. Torre A.On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission.Regional Studies. 2008;42:869-889
74. Torre A,Rallet A.Proximity and localization.Regional Studies. 2005;39 (1): 47-59
75. Trippl M.Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2010;101:150-160
76. Trippl M,Tödtling F,Lengauer L.Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna software sector.Economic Geography. 2009;85:443-462