Double jeopardy in inferring cognitive processes

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue SEP, 2014, Pages

  Fific, Mario ^a  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907083861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01130     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Bartlema, A., Lee, M.D., Wetzels, R., & Vanpaemel, W. (in press). A Bayesian hierarchical mixture approach to individual differences: Case studies in selective attention and representation in category learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
2. Benjamin, A. S., (2013). Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: Comment on kellen, klauer, and singmann (2012). Psychological Review, 120(3), 720-726.
3. Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Models for processing and identification of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 9(5), 443-448.
4. Broder, A., & Schutz, J. (2009). Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? on premature arguments against the too-high-threshold model of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 587-606.
5. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2003). Averaging learning curves across and within participants. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35(1), 11-21.
6. Chechile, R. A. (2009). Pooling data versus averaging model fits for some prototypical multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(6), 562-576.
7. Checkosky, S. F., & Whitlock, D. (1973). Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100(2), 341-348.
8. Cohen, A. L., Sanborn, A. N., & Shiffrin, R. N. (2008). Model evaluation using grouped or individual data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 692-712.
9. Dube, C., & Rotello, C. M. (2012). Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved. Journal or Experimental Psychology: Memory, Learning, and Cognition, 38(1), 130-151.
10. Dzhafarov, E. N., Schweickert, R., & Sung, K. (2004). Mental architectures with selectively influenced but stochastically interdependent components. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48(1), 51-64.
11. Egeth, H. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1(8), 245-252.
12. Egeth, H., & Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17(2), 551-560.
13. Eidels, A., Townsend, J. T., & Pomerantz, J. R. (2008). Where similarity beats redundancy: The importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1441-1463.
14. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, pp. 134-140.
15. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance. Psychonomics Bulletin Review, 12(3), 403-408.
16. Farell, B. (1985). Same-different judgments: A review of current controversies if perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98(3), 419-456.
17. Fific, M., Little, D. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2010). Logical rule models of classification response times: A synthesis of mental architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. Psychological Review, 117(2), 309-348.
18. Fific, M., Nosofsky, R. M., & Townsend, J. T. (2008). Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: A validation test of the systems factorial technology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 356-375.
19. Fific, M., Townsend, J. T., & Eidels, A. (2008). Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(4), 583-603.
20. Fitousi, D., & Wenger, M. J. (2011). Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: A closer look at load theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 781-798.
21. Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116(2), 439-453.
22. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristics: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107-143.
23. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). Time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(1), 29-50.
24. Hilbig, B. E. (2008). Individual differences in fast-and-frugal decision making: Neuroticism and the recognition heuristic. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1641-1645.
25. Hills, T. T., & Hertwig, R. (2012). Tow distinct exploratory behaviors in decisions from experience: Comment on gonzalez and dutt (2011). Psychological Review, 119(4), 888-892.
26. Houpt, J. W., Blaha, L. M., McIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2014). Systems factorial technology with R.Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 307-330. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.gvsu.edu/docview/1536032474?accountid=39473
27. Johnson, S. A., Blaha, L. M., Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2010). Systems factorial technology provides new insights on global-local information processing in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(1), 53-72.
28. Kellen, D., Klauer, K. C., & Broder, A. (2013). Recognition and memory models and binaryresponse ROCs: A comparison by minimum description length. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 693-719.
29. Kellen, D., Klauer, K. C., & Singmann, H. (2013). On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: Reply to Benjamin (2013). Psychological Review, 120(3), 727-730. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033141
30. Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G. (2011). Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 750-758.
31. Lachmann, T., & Geissler, H.-G. (2002). Memory search instead of template matching? Representation-guided inference in same-different performance.Acta Psychologica, 111, 19-43.
32. Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2004). Memory-guided inference in same-different comparison tasks. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schro¨ger, & H. J. Mu¨ller (Eds.),Psychophysicsbeyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition (pp. 199-221). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Lee, M.D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1-15
34. Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., & Denton, S. E. (2011). Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 1-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021330
35. Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Donkin, C., & Denton, S. E. (2013). Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 801-820.
36. Liu, C. C., & Smith, P. L. (2009). Comparing time-accuracy curves: Beyond goodness-of-fit measures. Psychonomics Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 190-203.
37. Maddox, W. T. (1999). On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(2), 354-375.
38. Marewski, J. N., Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognition-based models for multialternative inference. Psychonomics Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 287-309.
39. Miller, J. O. (1978). Multidimensional same-different judgments: Evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 411-422.
40. Myung, I. J., Kim, C., & Pitt, M. A. (2000). Toward and explanation of the power of law artifact: Insight from response surface analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 832-840.
41. Nickerson, R. S. (1965). Response times for same-different judgments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20(1), 15-18.
42. Nickerson, R. S. (1969). Same-different response times: A model and a preliminary test. Acta Psychcologica, Amsterdamn, 30, 501-517.
43. Nosofsky, R. M., Little, D. R., Donkin, C., & Fific, M. (2011). Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Psychological Review, 118(2), 280-315.
44. Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Wolkewitz, R. (2014). The affect gap in risky choice: Affect-rich outcomes attenuate attention to probability information. Decision, 1(1), 64-78.
45. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
46. Posner, M. I., & Mitchell, R. F. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 74(5), 392-409.
47. Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88(4), 291-326.
48. Regenwetter, M., Grofman, B., Popova, A., Messner, W., Davis-Stober, C. & Cavagnaro, D. (2009). Behavioural social choice: A status report. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 833-843.
49. Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to bayesian hierarchial models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomics Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 573-604.
50. Schmidt, K.-D., & Ackermann, B. (1990). The structure of internal representations and reaction time related matching task phenomena. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed., in collaboration with M. H. Mueller, & W. Prinz), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 278-289). Go¨ttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
51. Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor methods analysis of a stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26, 105-139.
52. Schweickert, R. (1985). Separable effects of factors on speed and accuracy: Memory scanning, lexical decision, and choice tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 530-546.
53. Schweickert, R., Giorgini, M., & Dzhafarov, E. (2000). Selective influence and response time cumulative distribution functions in serial-parallel task networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(4), 504-535.
54. Schweickert, R., & Townsend, J. T. (1989). A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33(3), 328-347.
55. Soto, F. A., Vucovich, L., Musgrave, R., & Ashby, F. G., (in press). General recognition theory with individual differences: A new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
56. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. S+cience, 153(3736), 652-654.
57. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, Amsterdam, 30, 276-315.
58. Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. Methods, models, and conceptual issues: An invitation to cognitive science, vol. 4. (pp. 703-863) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Sung, K. (2008). Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: Evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1372-1388.
60. Townsend, J. T. (1969). Mock parallel and serial models and experimental detection of these. Paper presented at the Purdue Centennial Symposium on Information Processing.
61. Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 161-163.
62. Townsend, J. T. (1984). Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28(4), 363-400.
63. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1(1), 46-54.
64. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes: Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ. Press.
65. Townsend, J. T., & Fific, M. (2004). Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in human memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(6), 953-962.
66. Townsend, J. T., Fific, M., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (2007). Assessment of mental architecture in clinical/cognitive research. Psychological clinical science: Papers in honor of Richard M. McFall. (pp. 223-258) Psychology Press, New York, NY.
67. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39(4), 321-359.
68. Townsend, J. T., & Thomas, R. D. (1994). Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: Effects on systems factorial interactions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38(1), 1-34.
69. Turner, B. M., Dennis, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2013). Likelihood-free bayesian analysis of memory. Psychological Review, 120(3), 667-668.
70. Yang, C. (2011). Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1708-1728. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024257
71. Yang, C., Chang, T., & Wu, C. (2013). Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1365-1385.
72. Yang, H., Fific, M., Townsend, J. T. (2014). Survivor Interaction Contrast Wiggle Predictions of Parallel and Serial Models for an Arbitrary Number of Processes. Journal of mathematical psychology. (59). p.82 - 94
73. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges. Scientific psychology series (pp. 229-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
74. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). On the costs and benefits of faces and words: Process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 755-779.