On the costs and benefits of faces and words: Process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 755-779

  Wenger, Michael J ^a   Townsend, James T ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capacity; Face perception; Serial and parallel processing; Visual search

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

FACE; GESTALT THEORY; HUMANS; INDIANA; LINEAR MODELS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33746927519     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.755     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (2000). The spread of attention and learning in feature search: Effects of target distribution and task difficulty. Vision Research, 40, 1349-1364.
2. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Ashby, F. G. (1976). Pattern matching: Self-terminating or exhaustive processing. Unpublished master's thesis, Purdue University.
4. Ashby. F. G. (2000). A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 310-329.
5. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron. E. M. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
6. Ashby, F. G., & Lee, W. W. (1993). Perceptual variability as a fundamental axiom of perceptual science. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 369-399). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., & Lee, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity choice model. Psychological Science, 5, 144-151.
8. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
9. Atkinson, R. C., Holmgren, J. R., & Juola, J. F. (1969). Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 321-326.
10. Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
11. Blaha, L. M., & Townsend, J. T. (2004, July). From nonsense to gestalt: The influence of configural learning on processing capacity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Ann Arbor, MI.
12. Bricolo, E., Gianesini, T., Fanini, A., Bundesen, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2002). Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A direct behavioral demonstration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 980-993.
13. Bruce, V. (1979). Searching for politicians: An information processing approach to face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 31(A), 373-395.
14. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
15. Busemeyer, J. B., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
16. Camp, C. J., & Maxwell, S. E. (1983). A comparison of various strengthof-association measures commonly used in gerontological research. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 3-7.
17. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe. J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
18. Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1981). Skilled memory. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 141-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Collett, D. (1994). Modeling survival data in medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.
20. Cox. D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 34, 187-220.
21. Dosher, B. A. (1998). Models of visual search: Finding a face in a crowd. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An imitation to cognitive science: Methods, models and conceptual issues (pp. 455-521). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
22. Dosher, B. A., Han, S., & Lu, Z.-L. (2004). Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 3-27.
23. Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z. L. (1999). Mechanisms of perceptual learning. Vision Research, 39, 3197-3221.
24. Doyle, J. R., & Leach, C. (1988). Word superiority in signal detection: Barely a glimpse, yet reading nonetheless. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 283-318.
25. Dzhafarov, E. N. (1997). Process representations and decompositions of response times. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 255-277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science, 9, 111-118.
27. Eckstein, M. P., Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2000). A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 425-451.
28. Egeth. II. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 245-252.
29. Ellis, H. D. (1975). Recognizing faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 409-426.
30. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. (1990). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychological Science, 1, 323-326.
31. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. (1991). Preattentive recovery of threedimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
32. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Review, 53, 134-140.
33. Estes, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 122-145.
34. Estes. W. K., & Brunn, J. L. (1987). Discriminability and bias in the word superiority effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 411-422.
35. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
36. Fisher, D. L. (1982). Limited-channel models of automatic detection: Capacity in scanning in visual search. Psychological Review, 89, 662-692.
37. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski. P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson. A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191-197.
38. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarksi, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.
39. Gilford. R. M., & Juola, J. M. (1976). Familiarity effects on memory and visual search. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 142-144.
40. Hampton, C, Purcell, D. G., Bersine, L., Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1989). Probing "pop-out": Another look at the face-in-the-crowd effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 563-566.
41. Ingvalson, E. M., & Wenger, M. J. (2005). A strong test of the dual mode hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 14-35.
42. Johnson, N. F., & Carnot. M. J. (1990). On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: Do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan? Memory & Cognition, 18, 31-39.
43. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
44. Kanwisher, N., Stanley, D., & Harris, A. (1999). The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals. NeuroReport, 10, 183-187.
45. Karlin, M. B., & Bower. G. H. (1976). Semantic category effects in visual word search. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 417-424.
46. Kinchla, R. A., Chen, Z., & Evert, D. (1995). Precue effects in visualsearch: Data or resource limited? Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 441-450.
47. Klein, R. (1978). Visual detection of line segments: Two exceptions to the object superiority effect. Perception &, Psychophysics, 24, 237-242.
48. Koshino, H. (2001). Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 294-300.
49. Kuehn, S. M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). Impact of the quality of the image, orientation, and similarity of the stimuli on visual search for faces. Perception, 23, 95-122.
50. Levin, D. N. (2000). A differential geometric description of the relationship among percepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 241-284.
51. Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.
52. Levin, D. T., & Angelone, B. (2001). Visual search for a socially defined feature: What causes the search asymmetry favoring cross-race faces? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 423-435.
53. Liu, Z. L., & Dosher, B. A. (1998). External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research, 38, 1183-1198.
54. Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5, 58-70.
55. Massaro, D. W. (1979). Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 595-609.
56. McDermott, K. B., Buckner. R. L., Petersen, S. E., Kelley, W. M., & Sanders, A. L. (1999). Set- and code-specific activation in frontal cortex: An f'MRI study of encoding and retrieval of faces and words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 631-640.
57. McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1517-1539.
58. Mermelstein, R., Banks, W., & Prinzmetal, W. (1979). Figurai goodness effects in perception and memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 472-480.
59. Naus, M. J. (1974). Memory search of categorized lists: A consideration of alternative self-terminating search strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 992-1000.
60. Naus, M. J., Glucksberg, S., & Ornstein, P. A. (1972). Taxonomic word categories and memory search. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 643-654.
61. Neisser, U. (1963). Decision time without reaction time: Experiments in visual scanning. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 376-385.
62. Neisser, U. (1964). Visual search. Scientific American, 210, 94-102.
63. Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). Faces and facial expressions do not pop out. Perception, 22, 1287-1298.
64. O'Toole. A. J., Wenger, M. J., & Townsend. J. T. (2001). Quantitative models of perceiving and remembering faces: Precedents and possibilities. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 1-38). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual-search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703-1721.
66. Palmer, J. (1995). Attention and visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118-123.
67. Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1227-1268.
68. Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.). (2003). Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and. holistic processes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
69. Prinzmetal, W. (1992). The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 473-484.
70. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 940-953.
71. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367.
72. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
73. Schweickert, R. (1983). Latent network theory: Scheduling of processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 353-383.
74. Schweickert, R., Fisher. D. L., & Goldstein, W. M. (1992). General latent network theory: Structural and quantitative analysis of networks of cognitive processes (Technical Report No. 92-1). West Lafayette, IN: Mathematical Psychology Program, Purdue University.
75. Schweickert, R., Giorgini, M., & Dzhafarov, E. (2000). Selective influence and response time cumulative distribution functions in serial-parallel task networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 504-535.
76. Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567-593.
77. Smith, P. L. (1998). Bloch's law predictions from diffusion process models of detection. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 139-147.
78. Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 408-463.
79. Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neuroscience, 27, 161-168.
80. Sperling, G., & Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.). Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-65). New York: Wiley.
81. Sternberg, S. (1966, August 8). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
82. Strongman, K. T., & Brown, R. (1966). Visual search with meaningful and non-meaningful material. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 78(A), 164-168.
83. Suzuki. S., & Cavanagh, P. (1992). Facial expression as an emergent feature in visual search. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 1355.
84. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 901-913.
85. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(A), 225-245.
86. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.
87. Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000). Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. New York: Springer-Verlag.
88. Thomas, R. D. (2001). Characterizing perceptual interactions in face identification using multidimensional signal detection theory. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.). Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 193-228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016-1025.
91. Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 168-199.
92. Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 133-168). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Townsend, J. T. (1976). Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 219-238.
94. Townsend, J. T. (1984). Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 363-400.
95. Townsend, J. T. (1990a). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should be) distinguished. Psychological Sciences, 1, 46-54.
96. Townsend. J. T. (1990b). Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 551-567.
97. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In J. Castellan & F. Restle (Fids.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 3, pp. 200-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
99. Townsend, J. T., & Colonius, H. (1997). Parallel processing response times and experimental determination of the stopping rule. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 392-397.
100. Townsend, J. T., & Fific, M. (2004). Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 953-962.
101. Townsend, J. T., Hu, G. G., & Evans, R. J. (1984). Modeling feature perception in brief displays with evidence for positive interdependencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 35-49.
102. Townsend, J. T., Hu, G. G., & Kadlec, H. (1988). Feature sensitivity, bias, and interdependencies as a function of intensity and payoffs. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 575-591.
103. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). On the spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359.
104. Townsend. J. T., & Schweickert, R. (1989). Toward the trichotomy method: Laying the foundation of stochastic mental networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 309-327.
105. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004a). The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 391-418.
106. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004b). A theory of interactive parallel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychological Review, 111, 1003-1035.
107. Treisman, A. M. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 114-125.
108. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of alternative choice. Psychological Review, 111, 757-769.
109. Weisstein, N., & Harris, C. S. (1974, November 22). Visual detection of line segments: An object superiority effect. Science, 186, 752-755.
110. Wenger, M. J. (1999). On the whats and hows of retrieval in the acquisition of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1137-1160.
111. Wenger, M. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708-719.
112. Wenger, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 872-892.
113. Wenger, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2003). Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1106-1118.
114. Wenger, M. J., & Payne, D. G. (1995). On the acquisition of mnemonic skill: Application of skilled memory theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 194-215.
115. Wenger, M. J., Schuster, C., Petersen, L. M., & Petersen, R. C. (in press). Applying proportional hazards models to response time data. In C. Bergeman & S. Boker (Eds.), Methodological. Issues in Aging Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
116. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2000). Basic response time tools for studying general processing capacity in attention, perception, and cognition. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 67-99.
117. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Faces as gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition; Contexts and challenges (pp. 229-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
118. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.
119. Widmayer, M., & Purcell, D. G. (1982). Visual scanning of line segments: Object superiority and its reversal. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 353-354.
120. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
121. Zbrodoff, J. N., & Logan, G. D. (2000). When it hurts to be misled: A Stroop-like effect in a simple addition production task. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1-7.