Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1365-1385

  Yang, Cheng Ta ^a   Chang, Ting Yun ^a   Wu, Chia Jung ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Change detection; Probability; Systems factorial technology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884952170     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030693     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Beck, M. R., Angelone, B. L., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Knowledge about the probability of change affects change detection performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 778-791. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.778
2. Beck, M. R., Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T., Peterson, M. S., & Varakin, D. A. (2008). Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1192-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.011
3. Beck, M. R., Peterson, M. S., & Angelone, B. L. (2007). The roles of encoding, retrieval, and awareness in change detection. Memory & Cognition, 35, 610-620. doi:10.3758/BF03193299
4. Bernstein, I. H., Rose, R., & Ashe, V. M. (1970). Energy integration in intersensory facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 86, 196-203.
5. Brehmer, B. (1990). Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Carlson, K. A., & Flowers, J. H. (1996). Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 460-470.
7. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
8. Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844-847.
9. Colonius, H. (1990). Possibly dependent probability summation of reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 253-275. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(90)90032-5
10. Dickinson, A., & Charnock, D. J. (1985). Contingency effects with maintained instrumental reinforcement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, 37, 397-416.
11. Dzhafarov, E. N. (1999). Conditionally selective dependence of random variables on external factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 123-157. doi:10.1006/jmps.1998.1231
12. Eidels, A., Houpt, J. W., Altieri, N., Pei, L., & Townsend, J. T. (2011). Nice guys finish fast and bad guys finish last: Facilitatory vs. inhibitory interaction in parallel systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 176-190.
13. Eldridge, L. L., Knowlton, B. J., Furmanski, C. S., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Engel, S. A. (2000). Remembering episodes: A selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1149-1152.
14. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in actioneffect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138-154. doi:10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8
15. Fific, M., Nosofsky, R. M., & Townsend, J. T. (2008). Informationprocessing architectures in multidimensional classification: A validation test of the systems factorial technology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 356-375. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.356
16. Fific, M., Townsend, J. T., & Eidels, A. (2008). Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 583-603. doi:10.3758/PP.70.4.583
17. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Encoding multielement scenes: Statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 521-537. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.521
18. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 497-510.
19. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
20. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 451-463. doi:10.3758/BF03203922
21. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Gwynne, J. W. (1984). Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 565-570. doi:10.3758/BF03207517
22. Ingvalson, E. M., & Wenger, M. J. (2005). A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 14-35. doi:10.3758/BF03195010
23. Jiang, Y., & Song, J.-H. (2005). Spatial context learning in visual search and change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1128-1139. doi:10.3758/BF03193546
24. Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5
25. Kujala, J. V., & Dzhafarov, E. N. (2008). Testing for selectivity in the dependence of random variables on external factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 128-144. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.01.008
26. Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 27, 364-382. doi:10.3758/BF03211420
27. MathWorks. (1993). MATLAB. Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.
28. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-X
29. Mordkoff, J., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 520-538. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.520
30. Nickerson, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement? Psychological Review, 80, 489-509. doi:10.1037/h0035437
31. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511
32. Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Creso Moyano, J., Myers, C., & Gluck, M. A. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature, 414, 546-550.
33. Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x
34. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User's guide: Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Inc.
35. Schwarz, W. (1989). A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 46, 498-500.
36. Schwarz, W. (1994). Diffusion, superposition, and the redundant-targets effect. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 504-520. doi:10.1006/jmps.1994.1036
37. Schweickert, R., Giorgini, M., & Dzhafarov, E. (2000). Selective influence and response time cumulative distribution functions in serial-parallel task networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 504-535. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1268
38. Shanks, D., & Dickinson, A. (1991). Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action-outcome contingency and contiguity. Memory & Cognition, 19, 353-360. doi:10.3758/BF03197139
39. Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psychologica, 68, 203-215. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(88)90056-X
40. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654. doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.652
41. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
42. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00067.x
43. Townsend, J. T. (2001). A clarification of self-terminating versus exhaustive variances in serial and parallel models. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1101-1106. doi:10.3758/BF03194528
44. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Townsend, J. T., & Eidels, A. (2011). Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 659-681. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0106-9
46. Townsend, J. T., & Fific, M. (2004). Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 953-962. doi:10.3758/BF03194987
47. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
48. Townsend, J. T., & Thomas, R. D. (1994). Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: Effects on systems factorial interactions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38(1), 1-34. doi:10.1006/jmps.1994.1001
49. Tyler, C. W., & McBride, B. (1997). The Morphonome image psychophysics software and a calibrator for Macintosh systems. Spatial Vision, 10, 479-484. doi:10.1163/156856897X00410
50. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1997). Tests of race models for reaction time in experiments with asynchronous redundant signals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 367-381. doi:10.1006/jmps.1997.1181
51. van Lamsweerde, A. E., & Beck, M. R. (2011). The change probability effect: Incidental learning, adaptability, and shared visual working memory resources. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1676-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.003
52. Van Zandt, T. (2000). How to fit a response time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 424-465. doi:10.3758/BF03214357
53. Van Zandt, T., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 563-580. doi:10.3758/BF03205204
54. Wenger, M. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708-719. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.708
55. Yang, C.-T. (2011). Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37, 1708-1728. doi:10.1037/a0024257
56. Yang, C.-T., Hsu, Y.-F., Huang, H.-Y., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2011). Relative salience affects the process of detecting changes in orientation and luminance. Acta Psychologica, 138, 377-389. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.003
57. Zehetleitner, M., Krummenacher, J., & Müller, H. J. (2009). The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1739-1759. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1739