Investigation and optimization of formulation factors of a hydrogel network based on kappa carrageenan-pregelatinized starch blend using an experimental design

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Volumn 458, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 117-125

  Lefnaoui, Sonia ^a   Moulai Mostefa, Nadji ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEDEA   (Algeria)

Author keywords

Bioadhesive hydrogel; Design of experiments; Drug release; Kappa carrageenan; Optimization; Pregelatinized starch

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; EMULSIONS; HYDROGELS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICS; DESIGN; STARCH;

BIO ADHESIVES; BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG RELEASE KINETICS; EXTENDED DRUG RELEASE; HYDROPHILIC POLYMERS; KAPPA CARRAGEENAN; PREGELATINIZED STARCHES;

STARCH; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS;

CARRAGEENAN; GLYCEROL; MICONAZOLE; POLYSORBATE 80; STARCH; PREGELATINIZED STARCH; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; DRUG DIFFUSION; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GEL; HYDROGEL; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; MEAN DISSOLUTION TIME;

EID: 84906939055     PISSN: 09277757     EISSN: 18734359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Manjanna K.M., Kumar T.M.P., Shivakumar B. Natural polysaccharide hydrogels as novel excipients for modified drug delivery systems: A review. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2010, 2:509-525.
2. Chan A.W., Whitney R.A., Neufeld R.J. Semi-synthesis of a controlled stimuli-responsive alginate hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:609-616.
3. Chang C., Duan B., Cai J., Zhang L. Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46:92-100.
4. Moura M., Figueiredo M., Gil M. Rheological study of genipin cross-linked chitosan hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:3823-3829.
5. Santo V.E., Frias A.M., Carida M., Cancedda R., Gomes M.E., Mano J.F., Reis R.L. Carrageenan-based hydrogels for the controlled delivery of PDGF-BB in bone tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:1392-1401.
6. Liu J., Lin S., Li L., Liu E. Release of theophylline from polymer blend hydrogels. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 298:117-125.
7. Shalviri A., Liu Q., Abdekhodaie M.J., Wu X.Y. Novel modified starch-xanthan gum hydrogels for controlled drug delivery: Synthesis and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79:898-907.
8. Ngoenkam J., Faikrua A., Yasothornsrikul S., Viyoch J. Potential of an injectable chitosan/starch/β-glycerol phosphate hydrogel for sustaining normal chondrocyte function. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 391:115-124.
9. Kyritsis A., Spanoudaki A., Pandis C., Hartmann L., Pelster R., Shinyashiki N., Hernández J.C.R., Ribelles J.L.G., Pradas M.M., Pissis P. Water and polymer dynamics in poly(hydroxyl ethyl acrylate-co-ethyl acrylate) copolymer hydrogels. Eur. Polym. J. 2011, 47:2391-2402.
10. Hezaveh H., Muhamad I.I. Controlled drug release via minimization of burst release in pH-response kappa-carrageenan/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels. Chem. Eng. Res. Design 2012, 91:508-519.
11. Nanaki S.G., Koutsidis I.A., Koutri I., Karavas E., Bikiaris D. Miscibility study of chitosan/2-hydroxyethyl starch blends and evaluation of their effectiveness as drug sustained release hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87:1286-1294.
12. Onofre F.O., Wang Y-J. Sustained release properties of cross-linked and substituted starches. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117:1558-1565.
13. Xiao C. Current advances of chemical and physical starch-based hydrogels. Starch/Starke 2013, 65:82-88.
14. Saboktakin M.R., Tabatabaie R.M., Ostovarazar P., Maharramov A., Ramazanov M.A. Synthesis and characterization of modified starch hydrogels for photodynamic treatment of cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51:544-549.
15. Hong K.N., Biao Y., Hui S., Guo Z.X. Wet blending of pregelatinized starch and poly(butylene succinate). Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 557:1121-1126.
16. Lefnaoui S., Moulai-Mostefa N. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of k-carrageenan pregelatinized starch-based mucoadhesive gels containing miconazole. Starch/Starke 2011, 63:512-521.
17. Picker K.M. The use of carrageenan in mixture with microcrystalline cellulose and its functionality for making tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1999, 48:27-36.
18. Hezaveh H., Muhamad I.I. The effect of nanoparticles on gastrointestinal release from modified κ-carrageenan nanocomposite hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89:138-145.
19. Mohamadnia Z., Zohuriaan-Mehr M.J., Kabiri K., Jamshidi A., Mobedi H. Ionically cross-linked carrageenan-alginate hydrogel beads. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Edn. 2008, 19:47-59.
20. Yu W. Preliminary study on structure of κ-carrageenan-konjac gum blend gels. Food Sci. 2012, 33:47-49.
21. Morgenthaler S., Schumacher M.M. Robust analysis of a response surface design. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999, 47:127-141.
22. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 2002, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
23. Jacques Y., Buri P. Optimisation of an ex vivo method for bioadhesion quantification. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1992, 38:195-198.
24. Govender S., Pillay V., Chetty D.J., Essack S.Y., Dangor C.M., Govender T. Optimisation and characterisation of bioadhesive controlled release tetracycline microspheres. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 306:24-40.
25. Nerurkar J., Jun H.W., Price J.C., Park M.O. Controlled-release matrix tablets of ibuprofen using cellulose ethers and carrageenans: effect of formulation factors on dissolution rates. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005, 61:56-68.
26. Amenaghawon N.A., Nwaru K.I., Aisien F.A., Ogbeide S.E., Okieimen C.O. Application of Box-Behnken design for the optimization of citric acid production from corn starch using Aspergillus niger. Br. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 3:236-245.
27. Tekindal M.A., Bayrak H., Ozkay B., Genc Y. Box-Behnken experimental design in factorial experiments: The importance of bread for nutrition and health. Turk. J. Field Crops 2012, 17:115-123.
28. Phadke M.S. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design 1989, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
29. Mao S., Shi Y., Li L., Xu J., Schaper A., Kissel T. Effects of process and formulation parameters on characteristics and internal morphology of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres formed by the solvent evaporation method. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 68:214-223.
30. Mehta R.C., Thanoo B.C., De Luca P.P. Peptide containing microspheres from low molecular weight and hydrophilic poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide). J. Control. Release 1996, 41:249-257.
31. Yang Y.Y., Chung T.S., Ng N.P. Morphology, drug distribution, and in vitro release profiles of biodegradable polymeric microspheres containing protein fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method. Biomaterials 2001, 22:231-241.
32. Efentakis M., Pagoni I., Vlachou M., Avgoustakis K. Dimensional changes, gel layer evolution and drug release studies in hydrophilic matrices loaded with drugs of different solubility. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 339:66-75.
33. Muller B., Kreuter J. Enhanced transport of nanoparticle associated drugs through natural and artificial membranes: A general phenomenon. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 178:23-32.
34. Fuertes I., Caraballo I., Miranda A., Millan M. Study of critical points of drugs with different solubilities in hydrophilic matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 383:138-146.
35. Fefelova N., Nurkeeva Z., Mun G., Khutoryanskiy V. Mucoadhesive interactions of amphiphilic cationic copolymers based on [2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] trimethyl ammonium chloride. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 339:25-32.
36. Bazigha K.A.R., Khan S.A. In vitro evaluation of Miconazole mucoadhesive buccal films. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2010, 2:23-26.
37. Nafee N.A., Ismail F.A., Boraie N.A., Mortada L.M. Mucoadhesive buccal patches of miconazole nitrate: In vitro/in vivo performance and effect of ageing. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 264:1-14.