Getting ahead: Forward models and their place in cognitive architecture

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 451-456

  Pickering, Martin J ^a   Clark, Andy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Active inference; Forward model; Joint action; Language; Prediction; Predictive coding; Simulation

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING;

ACTIVE INFERENCE; FORWARD MODELING; JOINT ACTIONS; LANGUAGE; PREDICTIVE CODING; SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

AUXILIARY FORWARD MODEL; CODING; COGNITION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; MODEL; NEUROSCIENCE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PROCESSING; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SIMULATION; VISION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOVEMENT; PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 84906779282     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.006     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:329-392.
2. Wilson M., Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Pscyhol. Bull. 2005, 131:460-473.
3. Jordan M.I., Rumelhart D.E. Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn. Sci. 1992, 16:307-354.
4. Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:423-431.
5. Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 2004, 27:377-442.
6. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1999, 9:718-727.
7. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 1998, 11:1317-1329.
8. Franklin D.W., Wolpert D.M. Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron 2011, 72:425-442.
9. Haruno M., et al. Hierarchical mosaic for movement generation. Int. Congr. Ser. 2003, 1250:575-590.
10. Gregory R.L. Perceptions as hypotheses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1980, 290:181-197.
11. Hinton G.E., et al. The wake-sleep algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science 1995, 268:1158-1160.
12. Rao R., Ballard D. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:79-87.
13. Lee T.S., Mumford D. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 2003, 20:1434-1448.
14. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:815-836.
15. Bastos A.M., et al. Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron 2012, 76:695-711.
16. Clark A. Whatever Next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:181-204.
17. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:293-301.
18. Friston K.J., et al. Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation. Biol. Cybern. 2011, 102:227-260.
19. Adams R.A., et al. Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. Brain Struct. Funct. 2013, 218:611-643.
20. James W. The Principles of Psychology 1890, Harvard University Press.
21. Lotze H. Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele 1852, Weidmannsche.
22. Kilner J.M., et al. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn. Process. 2007, 8:159-166.
23. Friston K., et al. Action understanding and active inference. Biol. Cybern. 2011, 104:137-160.
24. Brown H., et al. Active inference, sensory attenuation and illusions. Cogn. Process. 2013, 14:411-427.
25. Wolpert D.M., et al. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882.
26. Friston K. What is optimal about motor control?. Neuron 2011, 72:488-498.
27. Wolpert D.M., et al. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2003, 358:593-602.
28. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Self-, other-, and joint monitoring using forward models. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:132.
29. Fowler C.A., et al. Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. J. Mem. Lang. 2003, 49:296-314.
30. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
31. DeLong K.A., et al. Probabilistic word pre-activation during comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1117-1121.
32. Staub A., Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2006, 32:425-436.
33. Dikker S., et al. Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition 2009, 110:293-321.
34. D'Ausilio A., et al. Tongue corticospinal modulation during attended verbal stimuli: priming and coarticulation effects. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3670-3676.
35. Vigneswaran G.L., et al. M1 corticospinal mirror neurons and their role in movement suppression during action observation. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:236-243.
36. Ito M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:304-313.
37. Bastian A. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16:645-649.
38. Roth M., et al. The cerebellum optimizes perceptual predictions about external sensory events. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:930-935.
39. Koziol L.F., et al. Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition. Cerebellum 2014, 13:151-177.
40. Lesage E., et al. Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R794-R795.
41. Moberget T., et al. Generalized role for the cerebellum in encoding internal models: evidence from semantic processing. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:2871-2878.