Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex

Cognition

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 293-321

  Dikker, Suzanne ^a   Rabagliati, Hugh ^a   Pylkkänen, Liina ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ELAN; MEG; Morphology; Parsing; Syntax; Visual M100

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE TEST; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISUAL CORTEX; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59649108490     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Barber H., and Carreiras M. Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 1 (2005) 137-153
2. Bonte M., Parviainen T., Hytönen K., and Salmelin R. Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 16 1 (2006) 115-123
3. Bradley D. Computational distinctions of vocabulary type (1983), Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IA
4. Carpenter P.A., and Just M.A. What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In: Rayner K. (Ed). Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (1983), Academic Press, New York
5. Cohen L., Dehaene S., Naccache L., Lehericy S., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Henaff M.A., and Michel F. The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 123 Pt. 2 (2000) 291-307
6. Dehaene S., Jobert A., Naccache L., Ciuciu P., Poline J.B., Le Bihan D., and Cohen L. Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science 15 5 (2004) 307-313
7. DeLong K.A., Urbach T.P., and Kutas M. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8 8 (2005) 1117-1121
8. Di Russo F., Martinez A., Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., and Hillyard S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping 15 2 (2001) 95-111
9. Farmer T.A., Christiansen M.H., and Monaghan P. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 32 (2006) 12203-12208
10. Friederici A.D. Event-related brain potentials and aphasia. In: Berndt R.S. (Ed). Language and aphasia: Handbook of neuropsychology. 2nd ed. Vol. 3 (2001), Elsevier, Amsterdam 353-373
11. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 2 (2002) 78-84
12. Friederici A.D., and Meyer M. The brain knows the difference: Two types of grammatical violations. Brain Research 1000 1-2 (2004) 72-77
13. Friederici A.D., Pfeifer E., and Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 1 3 (1993) 183-192
14. Friederici A.D., Rüschemeyer S.A., Hahne A., and Fiebach C.J. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 13 2 (2003) 170-177
15. Friederici A.D., Von Cramon D.Y., and Kotz S.A. Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions. Brain 122 Pt. 6 (1999) 1033-1047
16. Friederici A.D., Wang Y., Herrmann C.S., Maess B., and Oertel U. Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study. Human Brain Mapping 11 1 (2000) 1-11
17. Gordon B., and Caramazza A. Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: Frequency saturation and open/closed class equivalence. Cognition 21 2 (1985) 95-115
18. Gross J., Ioannides A.A., Dammers J., Maess B., Friederici A.D., and Müller-Gartner H.W. Magnetic field tomography analysis of continuous speech. Brain Topography 10 4 (1998) 273-281
19. Gunter T.C., Friederici A.D., and Hahne A. Brain responses during sentence reading: Visual input affects central processes. Neuroreport 10 15 (1999) 3175-3178
20. Hagoort P., Wassenaar M., and Brown C.M. Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 16 1 (2003) 38-50
21. Hahne A., and Friederici A.D. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis. Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11 2 (1999) 194-205
22. Hahne A., Schröger E., and Friederici A.D. Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroreport 13 3 (2002) 305-309
23. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of signal processing in the human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics 65 (1993) 413-497
24. Hasting A.S., and Kotz S.A. Speeding up syntax: On the relative timing and automaticity of local phrase structure and morphosyntactic processing as reflected in event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 7 (2008) 1207-1219
25. Hauk O., Patterson K., Woollams A., Watling L., Pulvermüller F., and Rogers T.T. [Q:] When would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 ms. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 5 (2006) 818-832
26. Hickok G., and Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8 5 (2007) 393-402
27. Hinojosa J.A., Martin-Loeches M., Casado P., Muñoz F., and Rubia F. Similarities and differences between phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations in Spanish: An event-related potentials study. Language and Cognitive Processes 18 2 (2003) 113-142
28. Isel F., Hahne A., Maess B., and Friederici A.D. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French. Biological Psychology 74 3 (2007) 337-346
29. Itier R.J., Herdman A.T., George N., Cheyne D., and Taylor M.J. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG. Brain Research 1115 1 (2006) 108-120
30. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17 11 (1997) 4302-4311
31. Kotz S.A., and Friederici A.D. Electrophysiology of normal and pathological language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16 1 (2003) 43-58
32. Kutas M., Van Petten C., and Kluender R. Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994-2005). In: Traxler M.J., and Gernsbacher M.A. (Eds). Handbook of psycholinguistics. 2nd ed. (2006), Elsevier, New York 659-724
33. Lau E., Stroud C., Plesch S., and Phillips C. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language 98 1 (2006) 74-88
34. Liegeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., Badier J.M., Marquis P., and Chauvel P. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 92 (1994) 204-214
35. Liu J., Harris A., and Kanwisher N. Stages of processing in face perception: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience 5 9 (2002) 910-916
36. Liu J., Higuchi M., Marantz A., and Kanwisher N. The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. Neuroreport 11 2 (2000) 337-341
37. Liversedge S.P., and Findlay J.M. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 1 (2000) 6-14
38. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
39. Lueschow A., Sander T., Boehm S.G., Nolte G., Trahms L., and Curio G. Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing. Psychophysiology 41 3 (2004) 350-360
40. Matthei E.H., and Kean M.L. Postaccess processes in the open vs. closed class distinction. Brain and Language 36 2 (1989) 163-180
41. Meyer M., Friederici A.D., and Von Cramon D.Y. Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: Event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 9 1 (2000) 19-33
42. Morris J., and Holcomb P.J. Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 25 3 (2005) 963-981
43. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
44. Neville H., Nicol J., Barss A., Forster K., and Garrett M. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3 2 (1991) 151-165
45. Oberecker R., Friedrich M., and Friederici A.D. Neural correlates of syntactic processing in two-year-olds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 10 (2005) 1667-1678
46. Parviainen T., Helenius P., and Salmelin R. Cortical differentiation of speech and nonspeech sounds at 100 ms: Implications for dyslexia. Cerebral Cortex 15 7 (2005) 1054-1063
47. Pulvermüller F., and Shtyrov Y. Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage 20 1 (2003) 159-172
48. Pulvermüller F., and Shtyrov Y. Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology 79 1 (2006) 49-71
49. Pylkkänen L., Llinas R., and Murphy G.L. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 1 (2006) 97-109
50. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., and Pollatsek A. The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 4 (2003) 445-476 discussion 477-526
51. Rodríguez-Fornells A., Clahsen H., Lleo C., Zaake W., and Münte T.F. Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 11 1 (2001) 47-58
52. Rossi S., Gugler M.F., Hahne A., and Friederici A.D. When word category information encounters morphosyntax: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters 384 3 (2005) 228-233
53. Salmelin R. Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach. Clinical Neurophysiology 118 2 (2007) 237-254
54. Segalowitz S.J., and Lane K.C. Lexical access of function versus content words. Brain and Language 75 3 (2000) 376-389
55. Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F., Näätänen R., and Ilmoniemi R.J. Grammar processing outside the focus of attention: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 8 (2003) 1195-1206
56. Tanenhaus M.K., and Hare M. Phonological typicality and sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 3 (2007) 93-95
57. Tarkiainen A., Cornelissen P.L., and Salmelin R. Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Brain 125 Pt. 5 (2002) 1125-1136
58. Tarkiainen A., Helenius P., Hansen P.C., Cornelissen P.L., and Salmelin R. Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Brain 122 Pt. 11 (1999) 2119-2132
59. Tong F., Nakayama K., Vaughan J.T., and Kanwisher N. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21 4 (1998) 753-759
60. Virtanen J., Ahveninen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R., and Pekkonen E. Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 108 3 (1998) 291-298
61. Yamada Y., and Neville H.J. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences. Brain Research 1130 1 (2007) 167-180
62. Zweig, E., & Pylkkänen, L. (2008). A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes, doi:10.1080/01690960802180420.