Self-, other-, and joint monitoring using forward models

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue MAR, 2014, Pages

  Pickering, Martin J ^a   Garrod, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Dialogue; Forward models; Monitoring; Production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF MONITORING; SOCIAL COGNITION; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

EID: 84896949528     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00132     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adank, P. (2012). The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: two activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses. Brain Lang. 122, 42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.014
2. Amodio, D. M., and Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268-277. doi: 10.1038/nrn1884
3. Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., van Berkum, J., and Hagoort, P. (2013). Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cereb. Cortex doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht112. [Epub ahead of print].
4. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., and Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 941-952. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.941
5. Boland, H. T., Hartsuiker, R. H., Pickering, M. J., and Postma, A. (2005). Repairing inappropriately specified utterances: revision or restart? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 472-477. doi: 10.3758/bf03193790
6. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624-652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
7. Chouinard, M. M., and Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. J. Child Lang. 30, 637-669. doi: 10.1017/s0305000903005701
8. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, H. H., and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22, 1-39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7
10. D'Ausilio, A., Bufalari, I., Salmas, P., and Fadiga, L. (2012). The role of the motor system in discriminating normal and degraded speech sounds. Cortex 48, 882-887. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.017
11. Drew, P. (1997). 'Open'class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. J. Pragmat. 28, 69-101. doi: 10.1016/s0378-2166(97)89759-7
12. Garrod, S., and Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
13. Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E., and Byrd, D. (2007). Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition 103, 386-412. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.010
14. Gregoromichelaki, E., Kempson, R., Howes, C., and Eshgli, A. (2013). On making syntax dynamic: the challenge of compound utterances and the architecture of the grammar, in Alignment in Communication: Towards a New Theory of Communication, eds I. Wachsmuth, J. de Ruiter, P. Jaecks and S. Kopp (Amsterdam: Benjamins), 57-85.
15. Hartsuiker, R. J., and Kolk, H. H. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cogn. Psychol. 42, 113-157. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0744
16. Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., and De Jong, N. H. (2005). Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31, 921-932. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.921
17. Haruno, M., Wolpert, D. M., and Kawato, M. (2001). Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput. 13, 2201-2220. doi: 10.1162/089976601750541778
18. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Nagarajan, S. S., and Houde, J. F. (2006). Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. Neuroreport 17, 1375-1379. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000233102.43526.e9
19. Hickok, G., Houde, J., and Rong, F. (2011). Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 69, 407-422. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.019
20. Horton, W. S., and Gerrig, R. J. (2005). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Process. 40, 1-35. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4001_1
21. Indefrey, P., and Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92, 101-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
22. January, D., Trueswell, J. C., and Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in broca's area: implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 2434-2444. doi: 10. 1162/jocn.2008.21179
23. Krauss, R. M., and Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4, 343-346. doi: 10.1037/h0023705
24. Lane, H., and Tranel, B. (1971). The lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 14, 677-709.
25. Laver, J. (1980). Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production, in Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen and Hand, ed V. A. Fromkin (New York: Academic Press), 287-305. Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14, 41-104. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
26. Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The Organization of Perception and Action: A Theory for Language and Other Cognitive Skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. McMillan, C. T., and Corley, M. (2010). Cascading influences on the production of speech: evidence from articulation. Cognition 117, 243-260. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.019
30. Motley, M. T., Camden, C. T., and Baars, B. J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 21, 578-594. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5371(82)90791-5
31. Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., and Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca's area and language processing: evidence for the cognitive control connection. Lang. Linguist. Compass 4, 906-924. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00 244.x
32. Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., and Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cogn. Psychol. 63, 1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001
33. Peterson, R. R., and Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: evidence for cascaded processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24, 539-557.
34. Pickering, M. J., and Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 169-225. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x04000056
35. Pickering, M. J., and Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 329-392. doi: 10. 1017/s0140525x12001495
36. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models. Cognition 77, 97-132. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00090-1
37. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696-735. doi: 10. 2307/412243
38. Schlenk, K., Huber, W., and Wilmes, K. (1987). Prepairs and repairs: different monitoring functions in aphasic language production. Brain Lang. 30, 226-244. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90100-3
39. Scott, S. K., McGettigan, C., and Eisner, F. (2009). A little more conversation, a little less action-candidate roles for the motor cortes in speech perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 295-302. doi: 10.1038/nrn2603
40. Sereno, S. C., Brewer, C. C., and O'Donnell, P. J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition: evidence for early interactive processing. Psychol. Sci. 14, 328-333. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14471
41. Slevc, L. R., and Novick, J. M. (2013). Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing (commentary on pickering and garrod, 2013). Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 373-374. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002683
42. Tian, X., and Poeppel, D. (2010). Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models. Front. Psychol. 1:166. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg.2010.00166
43. Tian, X., and Poeppel, D. (2013). The effect of imagination on stimulation: the functional specificity of efference copies in speech processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 25, 1020-1036. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00381
44. Tourville, J. A., and Guenther, F. K. (2011). The DIVA model: a neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Lang. Cogn. Process. 26, 952-981. doi: 10.1080/01690960903498424
45. Tourville, J. A., Reilly, K. J., and Guenther, F. H. (2008). Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. Neuroimage 39, 1429-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.054
46. Tydgat, I., Diependaele, K., Hartsuiker, R. J., and Pickering, M. J. (2012). How lingering representations of abandoned words affect speech production. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 140, 218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.004
47. Van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., and Vissers, T. W. M. (2009). Monitoring in language perception. Lang. Linguist. Compass 3, 1211-1224. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00163.x
48. Van Wijk, C., and Kempen, G. (1987). A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: evidence from experimentally elicited corrections. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 403-440. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90014-4
49. Vigliocco, G., and Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound and syntax in sentence production. Psychol. Bull. 128, 442-472. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.442
50. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167, 392-393. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3917.392
51. Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1, 209-216. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(97)01070-x
52. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 487-494. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01773-3