Microbial communities evolve faster in extreme environments

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Li, Sheng Jin ^a   Hua, Zheng Shuang ^a   Huang, Li Nan ^a   Li, Jie ^a   Shi, Su Hua ^a   Chen, Lin Xing ^a   Kuang, Jia Liang ^a   Liu, Jun ^a   Hu, Min ^a   Shu, Wen Sheng ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEAL GENE; ARCHAEON; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIUM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PHYLOGENY; THERMAL SPRING;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENES, ARCHAEAL; GENES, BACTERIAL; HOT SPRINGS; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS; MUTATION RATE; PHYLOGENY; WATER MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84906673436     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06205     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen, E. E. & Banfield, J. F. Community genomics in microbial ecology and evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 489-498 (2005).
2. Denef, V. J., Mueller, R. S. & Banfield, J. F. AMD biofilms: using model communities to study microbial evolution and ecological complexity in nature. ISME J. 4, 599-610 (2010).
3. Rothschild, L. J. & Mancinelli, R. L. Life in extreme environments. Nature 409, 1092-1101 (2001).
4. Ghai, R. et al. New abundant microbial groups in aquatic hypersaline environments. Sci. Rep. 1, 135 (2011).
5. Kuang, J. L. et al. Contemporary environmental variation determines microbial diversity patterns in acid mine drainage. ISME J. 7, 1038-1050 (2012).
6. Zhou, J. et al. How sulphate-reducing microorganisms cope with stress: lessons from systems biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 452-466 (2011).
7. Zeldovich, K. B., Berezovsky, I. N. & Shakhnovich, E. I. Protein and DNA sequence determinants of thermophilic adaptation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e5 (2007).
8. Hemme, C. L. et al. Metagenomic insights into evolution of a heavy metalcontaminated groundwater microbial community. ISME J. 4, 660-672 (2010).
9. Denef, V. J. & Banfield, J. F. In situ evolutionary rate measurements show ecological success of recently emerged bacterial hybrids. Science 336, 462-466 (2012).
10. Tyson, G.W. et al. Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428, 37-43 (2004).
11. Allen, E. E. et al. Genome dynamics in a natural archaeal population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1883-1888 (2007).
12. Bapteste, E. & Boucher, Y. Lateral gene transfer challenges principles of microbial systematics. Trends Microbiol. 16, 200-207 (2008).
13. von Mering, C. et al. Quantitative phylogenetic assessment of microbial communities in diverse environments. Science 315, 1126-1130 (2007).
14. Schliep, K., Lopez, P., Lapointe, F. J.&Bapteste,É.Harvesting evolutionary signals in a forest of prokaryotic gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1393-1405 (2011).
15. Xie, W. et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys with contrasting chemistries. ISME J. 5, 414-426 (2011).
16. Tringe, S. G. et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 308, 554-557 (2005).
17. Raes, J., Foerstner, K. U. & Bork, P. Get the most out of your metagenome: computational analysis of environmental sequence data. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 490-498 (2007).
18. Wright, S., Keeling, J.&Gillman, L. The road from Santa Rosalia:Afaster tempo of evolution in tropical climates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7718-7722 (2006).
19. Konstantinidis, K. T., Braff, J., Karl, D. M. & DeLong, E. F. Comparative metagenomic analysis of a microbial community residing at a depth of 4,000 meters at station ALOHA in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5345-5355 (2009).
20. Brazelton, W. J. & Baross, J. A. Abundant transposases encoded by the metagenome of a hydrothermal chimney biofilm. ISME J. 3, 1420-1424 (2009).
21. Sakharkar, K. R. & Chow, V. T. Strategies for genome reduction in microbial genomes. Genome Inform. 16, 69-75 (2005).
22. Yang, L. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in a human host environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7481-7486 (2011).
23. Tenaillon, O. et al. The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science 335, 457-461 (2012).
24. Boussau, B., Blanquart, S., Necsulea, A., Lartillot, N. & Gouy, M. Parallel adaptations to high temperatures in the Archaean eon. Nature 456, 942-U974 (2008).
25. Groussin, M. & Gouy, M. Adaptation to environmental temperature is a major determinant of molecular evolutionary rates in archaea. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2661-2674 (2011).
26. Lee, M. C. & Marx, C. J. Repeated, selection-driven genome reduction of accessory genes in experimental populations. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002651 (2012).
27. Moran, N. A., McLaughlin, H. J. & Sorek, R. The dynamics and time scale of ongoing genomic erosion in symbiotic bacteria. Science 323, 379-382 (2009).
28. Sung, W., Ackerman, M. S., Miller, S. F., Doak, T. G. & Lynch, M. Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18488-18492 (2012).
29. Giovannoni, S. J. et al.Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 309, 1242-1245 (2005).
30. Balbi, K. J. & Feil, E. J. The rise and fall of deleterious mutation. Res. Microbiol. 158, 779-786 (2007).
31. Nielsen, R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 197-218 (2005).
32. Hunt, B. G. et al. Relaxed selection is a precursor to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15936-15941 (2011).
33. Kimura, M. On the evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates. Genet. Res. 9, 23-24 (1967).
34. de Visser, J. A. G. The fate of microbial mutators. Microbiology 148, 1247-1252 (2002).
35. Conrad, T. M., Lewis, N. E. & Palsson, B. ø. Microbial laboratory evolution in the era of genome-scale science. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 509 (2011).
36. Barrett, R. D. & Schluter, D. Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 38-44 (2008).
37. Moran, N. A. Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2873-2878 (1996).
38. Denamur, E. et al. Evolutionary implications of the frequent horizontal transfer of mismatch repair genes. Cell 103, 711-721 (2000).
39. Drake, J. W. Avoiding dangerous missense: thermophiles display especially low mutation rates. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000520 (2009).
40. Grogan, D. W., Carver, G. T. & Drake, J. W. Genetic fidelity under harsh conditions: analysis of spontaneous mutation in the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7928-7933 (2001).
41. Mackwan, R. R., Carver, G. T., Drake, J. W. & Grogan, D.W. An Unusual Pattern of Spontaneous Mutations Recovered in the Halophilic Archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Genetics 176, 697-702 (2007).
42. van Wolferen, M., Ajon, M., Driessen, A. J. & Albers, S. V. How hyperthermophiles adapt to change their lives: DNA exchange in extreme conditions. Extremophiles 17, 545-563 (2013).
43. Gomez-Alvarez, V., Teal, T. K. & Schmidt, T. M. Systematic artifacts in metagenomes from complex microbial communities. ISME J. 3, 1314-1317 (2009).
44. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335-336 (2010).
45. Besemer, J. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W451-W454 (2005).
46. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D561-D568 (2011).
47. Beszteri, B., Temperton, B., Frickenhaus, S. & Giovannoni, S. J. Average genome size: a potential source of bias in comparative metagenomics. ISME J. 4, 1075-1077 (2010).
48. Jombart, T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403-1405 (2008).
49. Ciccarelli, F. D. et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283-1287 (2006).
50. Smillie, C. S. et al. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature 480, 241-244 (2011).
51. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792-1797 (2004).
52. Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540-552 (2000).
53. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa andmixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690 (2006).
54. Schliep, K. P. phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592-593 (2011).
55. Jombart, T., Balloux, F. & Dray, S. adephylo: new tools for investigating the phylogenetic signal in biological traits. Bioinformatics 26, 1907-1909 (2010).
56. Matsen, F. A., Kodner, R. B. & Armbrust, E. V. pplacer: linear time maximumlikelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 538 (2010).
57. Foerstner, K. U., von Mering, C.,Hooper, S. D.&Bork, P. Environments shape the nucleotide composition of genomes. EMBO Rep. 6, 1208-1213 (2005).
58. Yang, Z. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 555-556 (1997).
59. Shapiro, B. J. et al. Population genomics of early events in the ecological differentiation of bacteria. Science 336, 48-51 (2012).
60. Waack, S. et al. Score-based prediction of genomic islands in prokaryotic genomes using hidden Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 142 (2006).