WeFold: A coopetition for protein structure prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1850-1868

  Khoury, George A ^a   Liwo, Adam ^b   Khatib, Firas ^c,n   Zhou, Hongyi ^d   Chopra, Gaurav ^e,f   Bacardit, Jaume ^g   Bortot, Leandro O ^h   Faccioli, Rodrigo A ^h   Deng, Xin ⁱ   He, Yi ^j   Krupa, Pawel ^b,j   Li, Jilong ⁱ   Mozolewska, Magdalena A ^b,j   Sieradzan, Adam K ^b   Smadbeck, James ^a   Wirecki, Tomasz ^b,j   Cooper, Seth ^k   Flatten, Jeff ^k   Xu, Kefan ^k   Baker, David ^c   Cheng, Jianlin ⁱ   Delbem, Alexandre C B ^h   Floudas, Christodoulos A ^a   Keasar, Chen ^l   Levitt, Michael ^e   Popović, Zoran ^k   Scheraga, Harold A ^j   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^d   Crivelli, Silvia N ^m   more..

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

ⁱ University of Missouri   (United States)

^j Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^l BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^m University of California   (United States)

ⁿ University of Massachusetts Dartmouth   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

CASP; Coopetition; Foldit; Protein structure prediction; Structure refinement

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPETITION; COOPERATION; LABORATORY TEST; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VIDEO GAME;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; RESEARCH DESIGN; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84906312795     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24538     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Khatib F, DiMaio F, Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, Cooper S, Kazmierczyk M, Gilski M, Krzywda S, Zabranska H, Pichova I, Thompson J, Popović Z, Jaskolski M, Baker D. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011;18:1175-1177.
2. Protein Structure Prediction Center. 10th Community Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Davis: University of California, Davis; 2013.
3. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:ii-iv.
4. Moult J. A decade of CASP: Progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:285-289.
5. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round X. Proteins 2014;82:1-6.
6. Nugent T, Cozzetto D, Jones DT. Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category. Proteins 2014;82:98-111.11
7. MacCallum JL, Pérez A, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9. Proteins 2011;79:74-90.
8. MacCallum JL, Hua L, Schnieders MJ, Pande VS, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8. Proteins 2009;77:66-80.
9. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins 2014;82:164-174.
10. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Comparison of performance in successive CASP experiments. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:163-170.
11. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008;18:342-348.
12. Dill KA, MacCallum JL. The protein-folding problem, 50 years on science 2012;338:1042-1046.
13. Khoury GA, Smadbeck J, Kieslich CA, Floudas CA. Protein folding and de novo protein design for biotechnological applications. Trends Biotechnol 2014;32:99-109.
14. Floudas CA. Computational methods in protein structure prediction. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;97:207-213.
15. Bourne PE. CASP and CAFASP experiments and their findings. Structural bioinformatics. New York: Wiley; 2005. pp 499-507.
16. Radivojac P, Clark WT, Oron TR, Schnoes AM, Wittkop T, Sokolov A, Graim K, Funk C, Verspoor K, Ben-Hur A, Pandey G, Yunes JM, Talwalkar AS, Repo S, Souza ML, Piovesan D, Casadio R, Wang Z, Cheng J, Fang H, Gough J, Koskinen P, Toronen P, Nokso-Koivisto J, Holm L, Cozzetto D, Buchan DW, Bryson K, Jones DT, Limaye B, Inamdar H, Datta A, Manjari SK, Joshi R, Chitale M, Kihara D, Lisewski AM, Erdin S, Venner E, Lichtarge O, Rentzsch R, Yang H, Romero AE, Bhat P, Paccanaro A, Hamp T, Kassner R, Seemayer S, Vicedo E, Schaefer C, Achten D, Auer F, Boehm A, Braun T, Hecht M, Heron M, Honigschmid P, Hopf TA, Kaufmann S, Kiening M, Krompass D, Landerer C, Mahlich Y, Roos M, Bjorne J, Salakoski T, Wong A, Shatkay H, Gatzmann F, Sommer I, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ, Skunca N, Supek F, Bosnjak M, Panov P, Dzeroski S, Smuc T, Kourmpetis YA, van Dijk AD, ter Braak CJ, Zhou Y, Gong Q, Dong X, Tian W, Falda M, Fontana P, Lavezzo E, Di Camillo B, Toppo S, Lan L, Djuric N, Guo Y, Vucetic S, Bairoch A, Linial M, Babbitt PC, Brenner SE, Orengo C, Rost B, Mooney SD, Friedberg I. A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat Methods 2013;10:221-227.
17. Janin J. Assessing predictions of protein-protein interaction: The CAPRI experiment. Protein Sci 2009;14:278-283.
18. Geballe MT, Skillman AG, Nicholls A, Guthrie JP, Taylor PJ. The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: Introduction and overview. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2010;24:259-279.
19. Callaway E. Mutation-prediction software rewarded. Nature 2010, doi: 10.1038/news.2010.679.
20. Cooper S, Khatib F, Treuille A, Barbero J, Lee J, Beenen M, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D, Popovic Z, Foldit Players. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 2010;466:756-760.
21. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. 'NACCESS', Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London.
22. Subramani A, DiMaggio PA, Floudas CA. Selecting high quality protein structures from diverse conformational ensembles. Biophys J 2009;97:1728-1736.
23. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, Jacak R, Kaufman K, Renfrew PD, Smith CA, Sheffler W, Davis IW, Cooper S, Treuille A, Mandell DJ, Richter F, Ban YE, Fleishman SJ, Corn JE, Kim DE, Lyskov S, Berrondo M, Mentzer S, Popovic Z, Havranek JJ, Karanicolas J, Das R, Meiler J, Kortemme T, Gray JJ, Kuhlman B, Baker D, Bradley P. ROSETTA3: An object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 2011;487:545-574.
24. Yang Y, Zhou Y. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins 2008;72:793-803.
25. Chopra G, Kalisman N, Levitt M. Consistent refinement of submitted models at CASP using a knowledge-based potential. Proteins 2010;78:2668-2678.
26. Chopra G, Summa CM, Levitt M. Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008;105:20239-20244.
27. Rodrigues JP, Levitt M, Chopra G. KoBaMIN: A knowledge-based minimization web server for protein structure refinement. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:W323-W328.
28. Zhou H, Skolnick J. GOAP: A generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction. Biophys J 2011;101:2043-2052.
29. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. APOLLO: A quality assessment service for single and multiple protein models. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1715-1716.
30. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Protein structure prediction by Pro-Sp3-TASSER. Biophys J 2009;96:2119-2127.
31. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Ab initio protein structure prediction using Chunk-TASSER. Biophys J 2007;93:1510-1518.
32. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7594-7599.
33. Gront D, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. A new combination of replica exchange Monte Carlo and histogram analysis for protein folding and thermodynamics. J Comput Phys 2001;115:1569-1574.
34. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. SPICKER: A clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem 2004;25:865-871.
35. Liwo A, Ołdziej S, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. I. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data. J Comput Chem 1997;18:849-873.
36. Liwo A, Czaplewski C, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Cumulant-based expressions for the multibody terms for the correlation between local and electrostatic interactions in the united-residue force field. J Chem Phys 2001;115:2323-2347.
37. Liwo A, Czaplewski C, Ołdziej S, Rojas AV, Kazmierkiewicz R, Makowski M, Murarka RK, Scheraga HA, Voth G. Simulation of protein structure and dynamics with the coarse-grained UNRES force field. Coarse Grain Cond Phase Biomol Syst 2008;1:1391-1411.
38. Liwo A, Khalili M, Czaplewski C, Kalinowski S, Ołdziej S, Wachucik K, Scheraga HA. Modification and optimization of the united-residue (UNRES) potential energy function for canonical simulations. I. Temperature dependence of the effective energy function and tests of the optimization method with single training proteins. J Phys Chem B 2006;111:260-285.
39. He Y, Xiao Y, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Exploring the parameter space of the coarse-grained UNRES force field by random search: Selecting a transferable medium-resolution force field. J Comput Chem 2009;30:2127-2135.
40. Czaplewski C, Kalinowski S, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Application of multiplexed replica exchange molecular dynamics to the UNRES force field: Tests with α and α+β proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 2009;5:627-640.
41. Wei Y, Thompson J, Floudas CA. CONCORD: A consensus method for protein secondary structure prediction via mixed integer linear optimization. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2012;468:831-850.
42. Subramani A, Floudas CA. β-sheet topology prediction with high precision and recall for β and mixed α/β proteins. PLoS One 2012;7:e32461.
43. Rajgaria R, McAllister SR, Floudas CA. Towards accurate residue-residue hydrophobic contact prediction for α helical proteins via integer linear optimization. Proteins 2009;74:929-947.
44. Rajgaria R, Wei Y, Floudas CA. Contact prediction for beta and alpha-beta proteins using integer linear optimization and its impact on the first principles 3D structure prediction method ASTRO-FOLD. Proteins 2010;78:1825-1846.
45. Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA. THE weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem 1992;13:1011-1021.
46. Kaźmierkiewicz R, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Addition of side chains to a known backbone with defined side-chain centroids. Biophys Chem 2003;100:261-280.
47. Kaźmierkiewicz R, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Energy-based reconstruction of a protein backbone from its α-carbon trace by a Monte-Carlo method. J Comput Chem 2002;23:715-723.
48. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
49. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008;4:435-447.
50. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 1997;18:1463-1472.
51. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 2010;78:1950-1958.
52. Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case DA. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins 2004;55:383-394.
53. Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 1999;314:141-151.
54. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round IX. Proteins 2011;79:1-5.
55. Zemla A. LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
56. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K. CASP prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL. Proteins 2014;82:7-13.
57. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, Kiefer F, Schwede T. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 2007;69 Suppl 8:38-56.
58. Tai C-H, Bai H, Taylor TJ, Lee B. Assessment of template-free modeling in CASP10 and ROLL. Proteins 2014;82:57-83.
59. Rost B. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 1999;12:85-94.
60. He Y, Mozolewska MA, Krupa P, Sieradzan AK, Wirecki TK, Liwo A, Kachlishvili K, Rackovsky S, Jagieła D, Ślusarz R, Czaplewski CR, Ołdziej S, Scheraga HA. Lessons from application of the UNRES force field to predictions of structures of CASP10 targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013;110:14936-14941.
61. Mirjalili V, Noyes K, Feig M. Physics based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging. Proteins 2014;82:196-207.
62. Heo L, Park H, Seok C. GalaxyRefine: Protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res 2013:W384-W388.
63. Chen VB, Arendall WB, 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010;66:12-21.
64. Crivelli SN, Dooley R, Holmes R, Mock S. The WeFold gateway: Enabling large-scale science coopetition, 2013. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER) 2013;1:23-27. doi: 10.1109/CLUSTER.2013.6702698.
65. DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Palo Alto, CA: Delano Scientific LLC; 2008.