Addition of side chains to a known backbone with defined side-chain centroids

Biophysical Chemistry

Volumn 100, Issue 1-3, 2002, Pages 261-280

  Kaźmierkiewicz, Rajmund ^a,b   Liwo, Adam ^a,b,c   Scheraga, Harold A ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

^c GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Protein backbone modeling; Side chain addition; United residue force field

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; APROTININ; DEOXYHEMOGLOBIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN BINDING FACTOR; PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA PROTEIN; PROTEIN; STAPHYLOCOCCUS PROTEIN A; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DROSOPHILA; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ENERGY; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BOVINAE; SCAPTODROSOPHILA LEBANONENSIS;

EID: 0037438462     PISSN: 03014622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4622(02)00285-5     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Liwo A., Pincus M.R., Wawak R.J., Rackovsky S., Scheraga H.A. Prediction of protein conformation on the basis of a search for compact structures; test on avian pancreatic polypeptide. Protein Sci. 2:1993;1715-1731.
2. Liwo A., Oldziej S., Pincus M.R., Wawak R.J., Rackovsky S., Scheraga H.A. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. I. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data. J. Comput. Chem. 18:1997;849-873.
3. Liwo A., Pincus M.R., Wawak R.J., Rackovsky S., Oldziej S., Scheraga H.A. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. II. Parameterization of local interactions and determination of weights of energy terms by Z-score optimization. J. Comput. Chem. 18:1997;874-887.
4. Liwo A., Kazemierkiewicz R., Czaplewski C., et al. United-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. III. Origin of backbone hydrogen-bonding cooperativity in united-residue potentials. J. Comput. Chem. 19:1998;259-276.
5. Lee J., Liwo A., Scheraga H.A. Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: Application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to apo-calbindin D9K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;2025-2030.
6. Liwo A., Lee J., Ripoll D.R., Pillardy J., Scheraga H.A. Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;5482-5485.
7. Lee J., Liwo A., Ripoll D.R., et al. Hierarchical energy-based approach to protein-structure prediction. Blind-test evaluation with CASP3 targets. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 77:2000;90-117.
8. Liwo A., Pillardy J., Czaplewski C., et al. UNRES - a united-residue force field for energy-based prediction of protein structure-origin and significance of multibody terms. Shamir R., Miyano S., Istrail S., Pevzner P., Waterman M. RECOMB 2000, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology. 2000;ACM, New York.
9. Pillardy J., Czaplewski C., Liwo A., et al. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;2329-2333.
10. Liwo A., Czaplewski C., Pillardy J., Scheraga H.A. Cumulant-based expressions for the multibody terms for the correlation between local and electrostatic interactions in the united-residue force field. J. Chem. Phys. 115:2001;2323-2347.
11. Lee J., Ripoll D.R., Czaplewski C., Pillardy J., Wedemeyer W.J., Scheraga H.A. Optimization of parameters in macromolecular potential energy functions by conformational space annealing. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:2001;7291-7298.
12. Pillardy J., Czaplewski C., Liwo A., et al. Development of physics-based energy functions that predict medium-resolution structures for proteins of the α, β, and α/β structural class. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:2001;7299-7311.
13. Liwo A., Pincus M.R., Wawak R.J., Rackovsky S., Scheraga H.A. Calculation of protein backbone geometry from α-carbon coordinates based on peptide-group dipole alignment. Protein Sci. 2:1993;1697-1714.
14. Kazmierkiewicz R., Liwo A., Scheraga H.A. Energy-based reconstruction of a protein backbone from its α-carbon trace by a Monte Carlo method. J. Comput. Chem. 23:2002;715-723.
15. Lee C., Subbiah S. Prediction of protein side-chain conformation by packing optimization. J. Mol. Biol. 217:1991;373-388.
16. Tuffery P., Etchebest C., Hazout S., Lavery R. A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side-chain conformations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 8:1991;1267-1289.
17. Desmet J., De Maeyer M., Hazes B., Lasters I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature. 356:1992;539-542.
18. Dunbrack R.L. Jr, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1993;543-574.
19. Mendes J., Soares C.M., Carrondo M.A. Improvement of side-chain modeling in proteins with the self-consistent mean-field theory method based on an analysis of the factors influencing prediction. Biopolymers. 50:1999;111-131.
20. Looger L.L., Hellinga H.W. Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable. Implications for protein design and structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 307:2001;429-445.
21. α coordinates: a test study. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 5:1989;170-182.
22. Correa P.E. The building of protein structures from α-carbon coordinates. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 7:1990;366-377.
23. α trace. Application to model building and detection of co-ordinate errors. J. Mol. Biol. 218:1991;183-194.
24. Feig M., Rotkiewicz P., Kolinski A., Skolnick J., Brooks C.L. III. Accurate reconstruction of all-atom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 41:2000;86-97.
25. Summers N.L., Karplus M. Construction of side-chains in homology modeling. Application to the C-terminal lobe of rhizopuspepsin. J. Mol. Biol. 210:1989;785-811.
26. Levitt M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J. Mol. Biol. 226:1992;507-533.
27. Wilson C., Gregoret L.M., Agard D.A. Modeling side-chain conformation for homologous proteins using an energy-based rotamer search. J. Mol. Biol. 229:1993;996-1006.
28. Eisenmenger F., Argos P., Abagyan R. A method to configure protein side-chains from the main-chain trace in homology modelling. J. Mol. Biol. 231:1993;849-860.
29. Bower M.J., Cohen F.E., Dunbrack R.L. Jr. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1997;1268-1282.
30. Dunbrack R.L. Jr. Comparative modeling of CASP3 targets using PSI-BLAST and SCWRL. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 3:1999;81-87.
31. Blundell T.L., Sibanda B.L., Sternberg M.J.E., Thornton J.M. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature. 326:1987;347-352.
32. Summers N.L., Carlson W.D., Karplus M. An analysis of side-chain orientations in homologous proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 196:1987;175-198.
33. Ponder J.W., Richards F.M. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol. 193:1987;775-791.
34. Lovell S.C., Word J.M., Richardson J.S., Richardson D.C. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 40:2000;389-408.
35. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1953;1087-1092.
36. Nilges M., Brünger A.T. Automated modeling of coiled coils: application to the GCN4 dimerization region. Protein Eng. 4:1991;649-659.
37. Lasters I., Desmet J. The fuzzy-end elimination theorem: correctly implementing the side-chain placement algorithm based on the dead-end elimination theorem. Prot. Eng. 6:1993;717-722.
38. Roitberg A., Elber R. Modeling side chains in peptides and proteins: application of the locally enhanced sampling and the simulated annealing methods to find minimum energy conformations. J. Chem. Phys. 95:1991;9277-9287.
39. Gerber R.B., Buch V., Ratner M.A. Time-dependent self-consistent field approximation for intramolecular energy transfer. I. Formulation and application to dissociation of van der Waals molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 77:1982;3022-3030.
40. Elber R., Karplus M. Enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics: use of the time-dependent Hartree approximation for a simulation of carbon monoxide diffusion through myoglobin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;9161-9175.
41. Czerminski R., Elber R. Computational studies of ligand diffusion in globins. I. Leghemoglobin. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 10:1991;70-80.
42. Kolinski A., Rotkiewicz P., Skolnick J. Application of high-coordination lattice model in protein structure prediction. Grassberger P., Barkema G.T., Nadler W. Monte Carlo Approach to Biopolymers and Protein Folding. 1998;World Scientific, Singapore/London.
43. Kolinski A., Rotkiewicz P., Ilkowski B., Skolnick J. Protein folding: flexible lattice models. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 138:2000;292-300.
44. Kolinski A., Betancourt M.R., Kihara D., Rotkiewicz P., Skolnick J. Generalized comparative modeling (GENECOMP): a combination of sequence comparison, threading, and lattice modeling for protein structure prediction and refinement. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 44:2001;133-149.
45. Némethy G., Gibson K.D., Palmer K.A., et al. Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometrical parameters and non-bonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm with application to proline-containing peptides. J. Phys. Chem. 96:1992;6472-6484.
46. Abbreviations and symbols for the description of the conformation of polypeptide chains. Biochemistry. 9:1970;3471-3479.
47. Vásquez M., Scheraga H.A. Calculation of protein conformation by the build-up procedure. Application to bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor using limited simulated nuclear magnetic resonance data. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 5:1988;705-755.
48. Kearsley S.K. On the orthogonal transformation used for structural comparisons. Acta Cryst. A. 45:1989;208-210.
49. Derrick J.P., Wigley D.B. The third IgG-binding domain from streptococcal protein G. An analysis by X-ray crystallography of the structure alone and in a complex with Fab. J. Mol. Biol. 243:1994;906-918.
50. Parkin S., Rupp B., Hope H. Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at 125 K: Definition of carboxyl-terminal residues Gly57 and Ala58. Acta Cryst. D. 52:1996;18-29.
51. Borden K.L.B., Boddy M.N., Lally J., et al. The solution structure of the RING finger domain from the acute promyelocytic leukaemia proto-oncoprotein PML. EMBO J. 14:1995;1532-1541.
52. 10→α bulge. Biochemistry. 32:1993;2509-2513.
53. Benach J., Atrian S., Gonzalez-Duarte R., Ladenstein R. The refined crystal structure of Drosophila lebanonensis alcohol dehydrogenase at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 282:1998;383-399.
54. Gouda H., Torigoe H., Saito A., Sato M., Arata Y., Shimada I. Three-dimensional solution structure of the B domain of staphylococcal protein A: comparisons of the solution and crystal structures. Biochemistry. 31:1992;9665-9672.
55. Huang E.S., Koehl P., Levitt M., Pappu R.V., Ponder J.W. Accuracy of side-chain prediction upon near-native protein backbones generated by ab initio folding methods. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 33:1998;204-217.
56. Gay D.M. Subroutines for unconstrained minimization using a model trust-region approach. ACM Trans. Math. Software. 9:1983;503-524.