Early embryonic specification of vertebrate cranial placodes

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 349-363

  Schlosser, Gerhard ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; RETINOIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SIX1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SIX3; WNT PROTEIN;

ADENOHYPOPHYSIS; ARTICLE; CRANIAL NERVE; EMBRYONIC STRUCTURES; GASTRULATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SILENCING; NEURAL CREST; NEUROECTODERM; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STEM CELL; VERTEBRATE; ANIMAL; ECTODERM; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HEAD; METABOLISM;

DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; ECTODERM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HEAD; NEURAL PLATE; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84906273461     PISSN: 17597684     EISSN: 17597692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wdev.142     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Northcutt RG, Gans C. The genesis of neural crest and epidermal placodes: a reinterpretation of vertebrate origins. Q Rev Biol 1983, 58:1-28.
2. Baker CVH, Bronner-Fraser M. Vertebrate cranial placodes. I. Embryonic induction. Dev Biol 2001, 232:1-61.
3. Schlosser G. Making senses: development of vertebrate cranial placodes. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2010, 283C:129-234.
4. Grocott T, Tambalo M, Streit A. The peripheral sensory nervous system in the vertebrate head: a gene regulatory perspective. Dev Biol 2012, 370:3-23.
5. Saint-Jeannet JP, Moody SA. Establishing the pre-placodal region and breaking it into placodes with distinct identities. Dev Biol 2014, 389:13-27.
6. Groves AK, LaBonne C. Setting appropriate boundaries: fate, patterning and competence at the neural plate border. Dev Biol 2014, 389:2-12.
7. Streit A. Early development of the cranial sensory nervous system: from a common field to individual placodes. Dev Biol 2004, 276:1-15.
8. Schlosser G, Northcutt RG. Development of neurogenic placodes in Xenopus laevis. J Comp Neurol 2000, 418:121-146.
9. Maier EC, Saxena A, Alsina B, Bronner ME, Whitfield TT. Sensational placodes: neurogenesis in the otic and olfactory systems. Dev Biol 2014, 389:50-67.
10. Sabado V, Barraud P, Baker CV, Streit A. Specification of GnRH-1 neurons by antagonistic FGF and retinoic acid signaling. Dev Biol 2012, 362:254-262.
11. Barraud P, Seferiadis AA, Tyson LD, Zwart MF, Szabo-Rogers HL, Ruhrberg C, Liu KJ, Baker CV. Neural crest origin of olfactory ensheathing glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:21040-21045.
12. Whitlock KE, Wolf CD, Boyce ML. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) cells arise from cranial neural crest and adenohypophyseal regions of the neural plate in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Dev Biol 2003, 257:140-152.
13. Forni PE, Taylor-Burds C, Melvin VS, Williams T, Wray S. Neural crest and ectodermal cells intermix in the nasal placode to give rise to GnRH-1 neurons, sensory neurons, and olfactory ensheathing cells. J Neurosci 2011, 31:6915-6927.
14. Saxena A, Peng BN, Bronner ME. Sox10-dependent neural crest origin of olfactory microvillous neurons in zebrafish. Elife 2013, 2:e00336.
15. O'Neill P, Mak SS, Fritzsch B, Ladher RK, Baker CV. The amniote paratympanic organ develops from a previously undiscovered sensory placode. Nat Commun 2012, 3:1041.
16. Frederikse PH, Kasinathan C, Kleiman NJ. Parallels between neuron and lens fiber cell structure and molecular regulatory networks. Dev Biol 2012, 368:255-260.
17. Streit A. Extensive cell movements accompany formation of the otic placode. Dev Biol 2002, 249:237-254.
18. Bhattacharyya S, Bailey AP, Bronner-Fraser M, Streit A. Segregation of lens and olfactory precursors from a common territory: cell sorting and reciprocity of Dlx5 and Pax6 expression. Dev Biol 2004, 271:403-414.
19. Xu H, Dude CM, Baker CV. Fine-grained fate maps for the ophthalmic and maxillomandibular trigeminal placodes in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 2008, 317:174-186.
20. Pieper M, Eagleson GW, Wosniok W, Schlosser G. Origin and segregation of cranial placodes in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 2011, 360:257-275.
21. Schlosser G, Ahrens K. Molecular anatomy of placode development in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 2004, 271:439-466.
22. Kumar JP. The sine oculis homeobox (SIX) family of transcription factors as regulators of development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009, 66:565-583.
23. Jemc J, Rebay I. The eyes absent family of phosphotyrosine phosphatases: properties and roles in developmental regulation of transcription. Annu Rev Biochem 2007, 76:24.1-24.26.
24. Tadjuidje E, Hegde RS. The eyes absent proteins in development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013, 70:1897-1913.
25. Xu PX, Adams J, Peters H, Brown MC, Heaney S, Maas R. Eya1-deficient mice lack ears and kidneys and show abnormal apoptosis of organ primordia. Nat Genet 1999, 23:113-117.
26. Laclef C, Souil E, Demignon J, Maire P. Thymus, kidney and craniofacial abnormalities in Six1 deficient mice. Mech Dev 2003, 120:669-679.
27. Zheng W, Huang L, Wei ZB, Silvius D, Tang B, Xu PX. The role of Six1 in mammalian auditory system development. Development 2003, 130:3989-4000.
28. Zou D, Silvius D, Fritzsch B, Xu PX. Eya1 and Six1 are essential for early steps of sensory neurogenesis in mammalian cranial placodes. Development 2004, 131:5561-5572.
29. Kozlowski DJ, Whitfield TT, Hukriede NA, Lam WK, Weinberg ES. The zebrafish dog-eared mutation disrupts eya1, a gene required for cell survival and differentiation in the inner ear and lateral line. Dev Biol 2005, 277:27-41.
30. Schlosser G, Awtry T, Brugmann SA, Jensen ED, Neilson K, Ruan G, Stammler A, Voelker D, Yan B, Zhang C, et al. Eya1 and Six1 promote neurogenesis in the cranial placodes in a SoxB1-dependent fashion. Dev Biol 2008, 320:199-214.
31. Ahmed M, Wong EY, Sun J, Xu J, Wang F, Xu PX. Eya1-Six1 interaction is sufficient to induce hair cell fate in the cochlea by activating Atoh1 expression in cooperation with Sox2. Dev Cell 2012, 22:377-390.
32. Kochhar A, Fischer SM, Kimberling WJ, Smith RJ. Branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2007, 143:1671-1678.
33. Brugmann SA, Pandur PD, Kenyon KL, Pignoni F, Moody SA. Six1 promotes a placodal fate within the lateral neurogenic ectoderm by functioning as both a transcriptional activator and repressor. Development 2004, 131:5871-5881.
34. Christophorou NA, Bailey AP, Hanson S, Streit A. Activation of Six1 target genes is required for sensory placode formation. Dev Biol 2009, 336:327-336.
35. Jacobson AG. The determination and positioning of the nose, lens and ear. III. Effects of reversing the antero-posterior axis of epidermis, neural plate and neural fold. J Exp Zool 1963, 154:293-303.
36. Martin K, Groves AK. Competence of cranial ectoderm to respond to Fgf signaling suggests a two-step model of otic placode induction. Development 2006, 133:877-887.
37. Bailey AP, Bhattacharyya S, Bronner-Fraser M, Streit A. Lens specification is the ground state of all sensory placodes, from which FGF promotes olfactory identity. Dev Cell 2006, 11:505-517.
38. Leung AW, Kent MD, Li JY. Differential BMP signaling controls formation and differentiation of multipotent preplacodal ectoderm progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 2013, 379:208-220.
39. Dincer Z, Piao J, Niu L, Ganat Y, Kriks S, Zimmer B, Shi SH, Tabar V, Studer L. Specification of functional cranial placode derivatives from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep 2013, 5:1387-1402.
40. Schlosser G. Induction and specification of cranial placodes. Dev Biol 2006, 294:303-351.
41. Stern CD. Neural induction: 10 years on since the 'default model'. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006, 18:692-697.
42. Rogers CD, Moody SA, Casey ES. Neural induction and factors that stabilize a neural fate. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2009, 87:249-262.
43. Ozair MZ, Kintner C, Brivanlou AH. Neural induction and early patterning in vertebrates. WIREs Dev Biol 2013, 2:479-498.
44. Suzuki A, Ueno N, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Xenopus msx1 mediates epidermal induction and neural inhibition by BMP4. Development 1997, 124:3037-3044.
45. Mizuseki K, Kishi M, Matsui M, Nakanishi S, Sasai Y. Xenopus zic-related-1 and sox-2, two factors induced by chordin, have distinct activities in the initiation of neural induction. Development 1998, 125:579-587.
46. Feledy JA, Beanan MJ, Sandoval JJ, Goodrich JS, Lim JH, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Sato SM, Sargent TD. Inhibitory patterning of the anterior neural plate in Xenopus by homeodomain factors Dlx3 and Msx1. Dev Biol 1999, 212:455-464.
47. Friedle H, Knöchel W. Cooperative interaction of Xvent-2 and GATA-2 in the activation of the ventral homeobox gene Xvent-1B. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:23872-23881.
48. Kwon HJ, Bhat N, Sweet EM, Cornell RA, Riley BB. Identification of early requirements for preplacodal ectoderm and sensory organ development. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1001133.
49. Tucker JA, Mintzer KA, Mullins MC. The BMP signaling gradient patterns dorsoventral tissues in a temporally progressive manner along the anteroposterior axis. Dev Cell 2008, 14:108-119.
50. Tribulo C, Aybar MJ, Nguyen VH, Mullins MC, Mayor R. Regulation of Msx genes by a Bmp gradient is essential for neural crest specification. Development 2003, 130:6441-6452.
51. Luo T, Lee YH, Saint-Jeannet JP, Sargent TD. Induction of neural crest in Xenopus by transcription factor AP2α. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:532-537.
52. Matsuo-Takasaki M, Matsumura M, Sasai Y. An essential role of Xenopus Foxi1a for ventral specification of the cephalic ectoderm during gastrulation. Development 2005, 132:3885-3894.
53. Rogers CD, Archer TC, Cunningham DD, Grammer TC, Casey EM. Sox3 expression is maintained by FGF signaling and restricted to the neural plate by Vent proteins in the Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 2008, 313:307-319.
54. Rogers CD, Harafuji N, Cunningham DD, Archer T, Casey ES. Xenopus Sox3 activates sox2 and geminin and indirectly represses Xvent2 expression to induce neural progenitor formation at the expense of non-neural ectodermal derivatives. Mech Dev 2009, 126:42-55.
55. Pieper M, Ahrens K, Rink E, Peter A, Schlosser G. Differential distribution of competence for panplacodal and neural crest induction to non-neural and neural ectoderm. Development 2012, 139:1175-1187.
56. Meulemans D, Bronner-Fraser M. Gene-regulatory interactions in neural crest evolution and development. Dev Cell 2004, 7:291-299.
57. Litsiou A, Hanson S, Streit A. A balance of FGF, BMP and WNT signalling positions the future placode territory in the head. Development 2005, 132:4051-4062.
58. Patthey C, Edlund T, Gunhaga L. Wnt-regulated temporal control of BMP exposure directs the choice between neural plate border and epidermal fate. Development 2009, 136:73-83.
59. Ahrens K, Schlosser G. Tissues and signals involved in the induction of placodal Six1 expression in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 2005, 288:40-59.
60. Glavic A, Silva F, Aybar MJ, Bastidas F, Mayor R. Interplay between Notch signaling and the homeoprotein Xiro1 is required for neural crest induction in Xenopus embryos. Development 2004, 131:347-359.
61. Luo T, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Thomas ML, Weeks DL, Sargent TD. Transcription factor AP-2 is an essential and direct regulator of epidermal development in Xenopus. Dev Biol 2002, 245:136-144.
62. Monsoro-Burq AH, Wang E, Harland R. Msx1 and Pax3 cooperate to mediate FGF8 and WNT signals during Xenopus neural crest induction. Dev Cell 2005, 8:167-178.
63. Bhat N, Kwon HJ, Riley BB. A gene network that coordinates preplacodal competence and neural crest specification in zebrafish. Dev Biol 2012, 373:101-117.
64. Sander V, Reversade B, De Robertis EM. The opposing homeobox genes Goosecoid and Vent1/2 self-regulate Xenopus patterning. EMBO J 2007, 26:2955-2965.
65. Phillips BT, Kwon HJ, Melton C, Houghtaling P, Fritz A, Riley BB. Zebrafish msxB, msxC and msxE function together to refine the neural-nonneural border and regulate cranial placodes and neural crest development. Dev Biol 2006, 294:376-390.
66. Ishihara T, Sato S, Ikeda K, Yajima H, Kawakami K. Multiple evolutionarily conserved enhancers control expression of Eya1. Dev Dyn 2008, 237:3142-3156.
67. Sato S, Ishihara T, Kawakami K. Evolutionarily conserved enhancers direct the expression of Six1 in cranial placodes. Mech Dev 2005, 122:S67.
68. de Croze N, Maczkowiak F, Monsoro-Burq AH. Reiterative AP2a activity controls sequential steps in the neural crest gene regulatory network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:155-160.
69. Li W, Cornell RA. Redundant activities of Tfap2a and Tfap2c are required for neural crest induction and development of other non-neural ectoderm derivatives in zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol 2007, 304:338-354.
70. Woda JM, Pastagia J, Mercola M, Artinger KB. Dlx proteins position the neural plate border and determine adjacent cell fates. Development 2003, 130:331-342.
71. Reichert S, Randall RA, Hill CS. A BMP regulatory network controls ectodermal cell fate decisions at the neural plate border. Development 2013, 140:4435-4444.
72. Kroll KL, Salic AN, Evans LM, Kirschner MW. Geminin, a neuralizing molecule that demarcates the future neural plate at the onset of gastrulation. Development 1998, 125:3247-3258.
73. Bellmeyer A, Krase J, Lindgren J, LaBonne C. The protooncogene c-myc is an essential regulator of neural crest formation in Xenopus. Dev Cell 2003, 4:827-839.
74. Kee Y, Bronner-Fraser M. To proliferate or to die: role of Id3 in cell cycle progression and survival of neural crest progenitors. Genes Dev 2005, 19:744-755.
75. Sato T, Sasai N, Sasai Y. Neural crest determination by co-activation of Pax3 and Zic1 genes in Xenopus ectoderm. Development 2005, 132:2355-2363.
76. Hong CS, Saint-Jeannet JP. The activity of Pax3 and Zic1 regulates three distinct cell fates at the neural plate border. Mol Biol Cell 2007, 18:2192-2202.
77. Nichane M, de Croze N, Ren X, Souopgui J, Monsoro-Burq AH, Bellefroid EJ. Hairy2-Id3 interactions play an essential role in Xenopus neural crest progenitor specification. Dev Biol 2008, 15:355-367.
78. Milet C, Maczkowiak F, Roche DD, Monsoro-Burq AH. Pax3 and Zic1 drive induction and differentiation of multipotent, migratory, and functional neural crest in Xenopus embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:5528-5533.
79. Marchal L, Luxardi G, Thome V, Kodjabachian L. BMP inhibition initiates neural induction via FGF signaling and Zic genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:17437-17442.
80. Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Thomsen GH. Ventral mesodermal patterning in Xenopus embryos: expression patterns and activities of BMP-2 and BMP-4. Dev Genet 1995, 17:78-89.
81. Chapman SC, Schubert FR, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A. Analysis of spatial and temporal gene expression patterns in blastula and gastrula stage chick embryos. Dev Biol 2002, 245:187-199.
82. Bouwmeester T, Kim S-H, Sasai Y, Lu B, Derobertis EM. Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann's organizer. Nature 1996, 382:595-601.
83. Steventon B, Araya C, Linker C, Kuriyama S, Mayor R. Differential requirements of BMP and Wnt signalling during gastrulation and neurulation define two steps in neural crest induction. Development 2009, 136:771-779.
84. La Bonne C, Bronner-Fraser M. Neural crest induction in Xenopus: evidence for a two-signal model. Development 1998, 125:2403-2414.
85. Monsoro-Burq AH, Fletcher RB, Harland RM. Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals. Development 2003, 130:3111-3124.
86. Carmona-Fontaine C, Acuna G, Ellwanger K, Niehrs C, Mayor R. Neural crests are actively precluded from the anterior neural fold by a novel inhibitory mechanism dependent on Dickkopf1 secreted by the prechordal mesoderm. Dev Biol 2007, 309:208-221.
87. Streit A, Berliner AJ, Papanayotou C, Sirulnik A, Stern CD. Initiation of neural induction by FGF signalling before gastrulation. Nature 2000, 406:74-78.
88. Pera EM, Ikeda A, Eivers E, De Robertis EM. Integration of IGF, FGF, and anti-BMP signals via Smad1 phosphorylation in neural induction. Genes Dev 2003, 17:3023-3028.
89. Hong CS, Park BY, Saint-Jeannet JP. Fgf8a induces neural crest indirectly through the activation of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm. Development 2008, 135:3903-3910.
90. Janesick A, Shiotsugu J, Taketani M, Blumberg B. RIPPLY3 is a retinoic acid-inducible repressor required for setting the borders of the pre-placodal ectoderm. Development 2012, 139:1213-1224.
91. Steventon B, Mayor R, Streit A. Mutual repression between Gbx2 and Otx2 in sensory placodes reveals a general mechanism for ectodermal patterning. Dev Biol 2012, 367:55-65.
92. Lleras-Forero L, Tambalo M, Christophorou N, Chambers D, Houart C, Streit A. Neuropeptides: developmental signals in placode progenitor formation. Dev Cell 2013, 26:195-203.
93. Dutta S, Dietrich JE, Aspock G, Burdine RD, Schier A, Westerfield M, Varga ZM. pitx3 defines an equivalence domain for lens and anterior pituitary placode. Development 2005, 132:1579-1590.
94. Karlstrom RO, Talbot WS, Schier AF. Comparative synteny cloning of zebrafish you-too: mutations in the Hedgehog target gli2 affect ventral forebrain patterning. Genes Dev 1999, 13:388-393.
95. Sjödal M, Edlund T, Gunhaga L. Time of exposure to BMP signals plays a key role in the specification of the olfactory and lens placodes ex vivo. Dev Cell 2007, 13:141-149.
96. Treier M, O'Connell S, Gleiberman A, Price J, Szeto DP, Burgess R, Chuang PT, McMahon AP, Rosenfeld MG. Hedgehog signaling is required for pituitary gland development. Development 2001, 128:377-386.
97. Ladher RK, O'Neill P, Begbie J. From shared lineage to distinct functions: the development of the inner ear and epibranchial placodes. Development 2010, 137:1777-1785.
98. Ladher RK, Anakwe KU, Gurney AL, Schoenwolf GC, Francis-West PH. Identification of synergistic signals initiating inner ear development. Science 2000, 290:1965-1967.
99. Nechiporuk A, Linbo T, Poss KD, Raible DW. Specification of epibranchial placodes in zebrafish. Development 2007, 134:611-623.
100. Ohyama T, Mohamed OA, Taketo MM, Dufort D, Groves AK. Wnt signals mediate a fate decision between otic placode and epidermis. Development 2006, 133:865-875.
101. Freter S, Muta Y, Mak SS, Rinkwitz S, Ladher RK. Progressive restriction of otic fate: the role of FGF and Wnt in resolving inner ear potential. Development 2008, 135:3415-3424.
102. Lassiter RN, Dude CM, Reynolds SB, Winters NI, Baker CV, Stark MR. Canonical Wnt signaling is required for ophthalmic trigeminal placode cell fate determination and maintenance. Dev Biol 2007, 308:392-406.
103. Canning CA, Lee L, Luo SX, Graham A, Jones CM. Neural tube derived Wnt signals cooperate with FGF signaling in the formation and differentiation of the trigeminal placodes. Neural Dev 2008, 3:35.
104. McCabe KL, Bronner-Fraser M. Essential role for PDGF signaling in ophthalmic trigeminal placode induction. Development 2008, 135:1863-1874.
105. Theveneau E, Steventon B, Scarpa E, Garcia S, Trepat X, Streit A, Mayor R. Chase-and-run between adjacent cell populations promotes directional collective migration. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15:763-772.