Political dynamics of framing

New Directions in Media and Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 173-192

  Klar, Samara ^b   Robison, Joshua ^b   Druckman, James N ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906184843     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203109052     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Monica Davey, "On Eve of Prison, Blagojevich Keeps Talking, but Some Tune Out," New York Times, March 14, 2012, A18.
2. Rick Pearson, "Topinka Gambling on Casino," Chicago Tribune, August 24, 2006.
3. Rick Pearson and John Chase, "Election Shrouded by Levine Guilty Plea," Chicago Tribune, October 29, 2006: 1.
4. James N. Druckman, "Competing Frames in the Political Campaign," in Winning with Words: The Origins and Impact of Political Framing, ed. Brian F. Schaffner and Patrick J. Sellers (New York: Routledge, 2010: 101-116).
5. James N. Druckman, "The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence," Political Behavior 23 (2001): 225-256.
6. James N. Druckman, "The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence," Political Behavior 23 (2001): 225-256.
7. Donald Kinder and Lynn Sanders, Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996);
8. Donald Kinder, "Communication and Opinion," Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1998: 173).
9. Dietram Scheufele, "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects," Journal of Communication 49 (1999).
10. Joseph N. Cappella and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
11. William A. Gamson and Andre Modigliani, "The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action," in Research In Political Sociology, ed. Richard G. Braungart. (Greenwich: JAI, 1987). 137-177
12. Erving Goffman, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974).
13. William A. Gamson, Talking Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
14. Dennis Chong, "How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties," American Journal of Political Science 37 (1993): 867-899.
15. Dennis Chong and James N. Druckman, "Framing Theory," Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007):103-126;
16. James N. Druckman, James H. Kluklinski and Lee Sigelman, "The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research," Political Behavior 31 (2009): 485-510.
17. James Druckman, "What's It All About?"
18. James N. Enelow and Melvin J. Hinich, The Spatial Theory of Voting (Boston: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
19. James Druckman, "Competing Frames in Political Campaigns."
20. Shanto Iyengar, Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
21. James N. Druckman and Lawrence Jacobs, "Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion," in The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, ed. George Edwards (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 160-181.
22. Scheufele, "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects."
23. George Lakoff, Don't Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives (White River Junction: Chelsea Green, 2004);
24. Matt Bai, "The Framing Wars," New York Times Magazine (July 17, 2005).
25. James N. Druckman and Justin W. Holmes, "Does Presidential Rhetoric Matter? Priming and Presidential Approval," Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (2004): 755-778.
26. Druckman and Holmes, "Does Presidential Rhetoric Matter? Priming and Presidential Approval."
27. Lydia Saad, "Bush Soars into State of the Union with Exceptional Public Backing" The Gallup Organization, Poll Analyses (January 29, 2002).
28. David E. Sanger, "Bush, Focusing on Terrorism, Says Secure U.S. Top Priority," New York Times, January 29, 2002.
29. James N. Druckman, Lawrence Jacobs, Eric Ostermeier, "Candidate Strategies to Prime Issue and Image" Journal of Politics 66 (2004): 1180-1202.
30. Druckman, Jacobs, Ostermeier, "Candidate Strategies to Prime Issues and Image."
31. Brandice Canes-Wrone, Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).
32. Stephen Ansolabehere and James M. Snyder, Jr., "Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When Officeholders Retire Strategically," Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2004): 487-515.
33. Gary Jacobson, The Politics of Congressional Elections (New York: Longman, 2004).
34. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Everything You Think You Know about Politics and Why You are Wrong (New York: Basic Books, 2000: 17).
35. Dennis Chong and James N. Druckman, "Identifying Frames in Political News," in Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, ed. Erik P. Bucy, R. Lance Holbert (New York: Routledge, 2011).
36. Frank Baumgartner, Suzanna L. De Boef, and Amber E. Boydstun, The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
37. Baumgartner, De Boef and Boydstun, The Decline of the Death Penalty: 176.
38. Dan B. Wood and Arnold Vedlitz, "Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming," American Journal of Political Science 51 (2007): 552-568.
39. Robert D. Benford and David A. Snow, "Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment," Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 611-639.
40. William G. Jacoby, "Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending," American Journal of Political Science 44 (2000): 750-767;
41. Paul R. Brewer, Joseph Graf, and Lars Willnat, "Priming or Framing: Media Influence on Attitudes Toward Foreign Countries," International Journal of Communication Studies 65 (2003): 493-508;
42. Tobin J. Grant and Thomas J. Rudolph, "Value Conflict, Group Affect, and the Issue of Campaign Finance," American Journal of Political Science 47 (2003): 453-469;
43. Stephen P. Nicholson and Robert M. Howard, "Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore," Journal of Politics 65 (2003): 676-695.
44. Thomas E. Nelson, Sarah M. Bryner, and Dustin M. Carnahan, "Media and Politics," in Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski and Arthur Lupia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 201-213.
45. Thomas E. Nelson, Rosalee A. Clawson and Zoe M. Oxley, "Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflct and Its Effect on Tolerance," The American Political Science Review 91 (1997): 567-583.
46. Iyengar and Kinder, News That Matters.
47. E. E. Schattschneider, The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960);
48. Robert M. Entman, "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm," Journal of Communication 43 (1993): 51-58;
49. William H. Riker, The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), 33;
50. John Zaller, "The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea," in Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. Diana Mutz, Richard Brody and Paul Sniderman (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996), 17-79.
51. Paul Sniderman and Sean M. Theriault, "The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing," in Studies in Public Opinion, ed. Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 133-165.
52. Sniderman and Theriault, "The Structure of Political Argument."
53. Paul R. Brewer and Kimberly Gross, "Values, Framing, and Citizens' Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity," Political Psychology 26 (2005): 929-948;
54. Kasper M. Hansen, "The Sophisticated Public: The Effect of Competing Frames on Public Opinion," Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2007): 377-396.
55. James Druckman and Dennis Chong, "A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments," Journal of Communication 57 (2007): 99-118.
56. Daniel O'Keefe, Persuasion: Theory of Research (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002).
57. James Druckman, "What's It All About?"
58. John Zaller, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 311.
59. Cappella and Jamieson, Spirals of Cynicism
60. Robin L. Nabi, "Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion: Do Discrete Emotions Differentially Influence Information Accessibility, Information Seeking and Policy Preference?" Communication Research 30 (2003): 225.
61. Dennis Chong and James N Druckman, "Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies," American Political Science Review 101 (2007): 637-655;
62. Lene Aarøe, "Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames," Political Communication 28 (2011): 207-226;
63. Else Marie Holm, Emotions as Mediators of Framing Effects (Arhaus: Politica, 2012);
64. James N. Druckman, Jordan Fein and Thomas Leeper, "A Source of Bias Within Public Opinion Stability" American Political Science Review (forthcoming);
65. James Druckman, "Media Effects in Politics," in Oxford Bibliographies Online: Political Science, ed. Rick Valelly (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
66. James N. Druckman and Kjersten Nelson, "Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence," American Journal of Political Science 47 (2003): 729-745.
67. James Druckman, "Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects," American Political Science Review 98 (2004): 671-686;
68. Samara Klar, "Partisanship and Preference Formation in a Social Context," working paper (2012).
69. Dennis Chong and James N. Druckman, "Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects Over Time," American Political Science Review 104 (2010): 663-680.
70. David Tewksbury, Jennifer Jones, Matthew W. Peske, Ashlea Raymond, and William Vig, "The Interaction of News and Advocate Frames." Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (2000): 804-829;
71. Druckman and Nelson, "Framing and Deliberation";
72. Claes H. de Vreese, "The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluations, and Policy Support," Mass Communication and Society 7 (2004): 191-214;
73. Diana C. Mutz and Byron Reeves, "The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust," American Political Science Review 99 (2005): 1-15;
74. Alan S. Gerber, James G. Gimpel, Donald P. Green, and Daron R. Shaw, "How Large and Long Lasting are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads?," American Political Science Review 105 (2011): 135-150.
75. Chong and Druckman, "Dynamic Public Opinion."
76. Druckman, Fein and Leeper, "A Source of Bias."
77. Nolan McCarty, "The Policy Consequences of Partisan Polarization in the United States." Unpublished paper (2012).
78. Nolan McCarty, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006);
79. Morris P. Fiorina and Samuel Abrams, "Political Polarization in the American Public," Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 563-588.
80. James N. Druckman, Erik Peterson, Rune Slothuus, "How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation" (paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 12-15, 2012).
81. Rune Slothuus and Claes H. de Vreese, "Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects," The Journal of Politics 72 (2010): 630-645;
82. Rune Slothuus, "When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Political Communication 27 (2010): 158-177.
83. O'Keefe, Persuasion: 147, 156
84. Kevin Arceneaux, "Cognitive Bias and Strength of Political Arguments," American Journal of Political Science 56 (2009): 271-285.
85. James N. Druckman and Toby Bolson, "Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emerging Technologies," Journal of Communication 61 (2011): 659-688.
86. Mark Allen Peterson, "Making Global News: 'Freedom of Speech' and 'Muslim Rage' in U.S. Journalism," Contemporary Islam 1 (2007): 247-264.
87. Samara Klar, "The Influence of Competing Identity Primes on Preference" (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, March 12-15, 2012);
88. Baumgartner, De Boef and Boydstun, The Decline of the Death Penalty;
89. Jill Edy, News and the Collective Memory of Social Unrest (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2006).
90. Markus Prior, "News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gap in Political Knowledge and Turnout," American Journal of Political Science 49 (2005): 577-592.
91. Iyengar and Kinder, News that Matters;
92. Zaller, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
93. Regula Hänggli, "Key Factors in Frame Building How Strategic Political Actors Shape News Media Coverage," American Behavioral Scientist 56 (2012): 300-317;
94. Regula Hänggli and Hanspeter Kriesi, "Frame Construction and Frame Promotion (Strategic Framing Choices)," American Behavioral Scientist 56 (2012): 260-278.
95. Robert M. Entman, Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
96. Hans Noel, "The Coalition Merchants: The Ideological Roots of the Civil Rights Realignment," The Journal of Politics 74 (2012): 156-173.
97. Lisa Disch, "The Impurity of Representation and the Vitality of Democracy," Cultural Studies 26 (2012): 207-222.
98. James H. Kuklinski and Gary M. Segura, "Endogeneity, Exogeneity, Time, and Space in Political Representation," Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (1995): 3-21;
99. Patricia Hurley and Kim Quaile Hill, "Beyond the Demand Input Model: A Theory of Representation Linkages," The Journal of Politics 65 (2003): 304-326.
100. Schattschneider, The Semi-Sovereign People.