Frame construction and frame promotion (strategic framing choices)

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 260-278

  Hänggli, Regula ^a   Kriesi, Hanspeter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

frame building; frame construction; frame promotion; strategic framing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856793439     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764211426325     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BernhardL. (2010). Direct democratic campaigning (Unpublished manuscript). University of Zurich, Switzerland.
2. Chong D.,Druckman J.N.Framing public opinion in competitive democracies.American Political Science Review. 2007a;101:637-656.
3. Chong D.,Druckman J.N.Framing theory.Annual Review of Political Science. 2007b;10:103-126.
4. De Vreese C.News framing: Theory and typology.Information Design Journal + Document Design. 2005;13 (1): 51-62.
5. Druckman J.N.The implications of framing effects for citizen competence.Political Behavior. 2001;23:225-256.
6. Druckman J.N.Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects.American Political Science Review. 2004;98:671-686.
7. Entman R.M.Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication. 1993;43:51-58.
8. Entman R.M.Projections of power framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004:.
9. Gerth M.A.,Siegert G.Patterns of consistence and constriction: How news media frame the coverage of direct democratic campaigns.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56 (3): 279-299.
10. Gilland K.,Marquis L.Campaigning in a direct democracy: Three case studies.Swiss Political Science Review. 2006;12 (3): 63-81.
11. HänggliR. (2010). The flow of messages. Unpublished manuscript, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
12. Hänggli R.Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news media coverage.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56 (3): 300-317.
13. Hänggli R.,Kriesi H.Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign.Political Communication. 2010;27:141-157.
14. Harmel R.,Janda K.An integrated theory of party goals and party change.Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1994;6:259-287.
15. Iyengar S.,McGrady J.A.Media politics: A citizen's guide. New York, NY: Norton; 2007:.
16. Jerit J.How predictive appeals shape policy opinions.American Journal of Political Science. 2009;53:411-426.
17. Kaplan N.,Park D.K.,Ridout T.N.Dialogue in American campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising.American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50:724-736.
18. King G.,Zeng L.Logistic regression in rare events data.Political Analysis. 2001;9:137-163.
19. Koopmans Ruud.Movements and Media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere.Theory and Society. 2004;33 (3/4): 367-391.
20. Matthes J.What's in a frame? A content analysis of media-framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990-2005.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2009;86:349-367.
21. Matthes J.Framing politics: An integrative approach.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56 (3): 247-259.
22. McClosky H.,Chong D.Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals.British Journal of Political Science. 1985;15:329-363.
23. Nelson T.E.,Clawson R.A.,Oxley Z.M.Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance.American Political Science Review. 1997b;91 (3): 567-583.
24. Nelson T.E.,Oxley Z.M.,Clawson R.A.Toward a psychology of framing effects.Political Behavior. 1997a;19 (3): 221-246.
25. Norris P.,Curtice J.,Sanders D.,Scammell M.,Semetko H.A.On message: Communicating the campaign. London, UK: SAGE; 1999:.
26. Perron L.How to overcome the power of incumbency in election campaigns?. Zurich, Switzerland: Institute of Political Science; 2007:.
27. Petrocik J.R.Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study.American Journal of Political Science. 1996;40:825-850.
28. Riker W.H.The strategy of rhetoric: Campaigning for the American constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1996:.
29. Schemer C.,Wirth W.,Matthes J.Value resonance and value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56 (3): 334-352.
30. Schulz W.Politische Kommunikation theoretische Ansätze und Ergebnisse empirischer Forschung zur Rolle der Massenmedien in der Politik. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag; 1997:.
31. Shoemaker, P.J., & Reese, S.D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman
32. Sigelman L.,Buell E.H.Avoidance or engagement? issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960-2000.American Journal of Political Science. 2004;48:650-661.
33. Sniderman, P.M., & Theriault, S.M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In P.M. Sniderman & S.M. Theriault (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error and change (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Wasserman S.,Faust K.Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
35. Wettstein M.Frame adoption in referendum campaigns: The effect of news coverage on the public salience of issue interpretations.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56 (3): 318-333.