Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 59-68

  Steiner, Genevieve Z ^a   Barry, Robert J ^a   Gonsalvez, Craig J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auditory event related potentials (ERPs); Equiprobable; Go NoGo; Interstimulus interval (ISI); N1; Nontarget to nontarget interval (NNI); P2; P3(00); P3b; Probability; Sequence effects; Slow wave (SW); Target to target interval (TTI)

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905858522     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alho K., Töttölä K., Reinikainen K., Sams K., Näätänen R. Brain mechanism of selective listening reflected by event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 68:458-470.
2. Barry R.J., De Blasio F.M. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2013, 89:123-127.
3. Barry R.J., Rushby J.A. An orienting reflex perspective on anteriorisation of the P3 of the event-related potential. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 173:539-545.
4. Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1998, 31:51-68.
5. Callaway E. Habituation of averaged evoked potentials in man. Habituation 1973, vol. 2:153-174. Academic Press, New York.
6. Čeponien R., Cheour M., Näätänen R. Interstimulus interval and auditory event-related potentials in children: evidence for multiple generators. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 108:345-354.
7. Coch D., Skendzel W., Neville H.J. Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: an ERP study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 116:2184-2203.
8. Croft R.J., Barry R.J. Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 30:5-19.
9. Croft R.J., Gonsalvez C.J., Gabriel C., Barry R.J. Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:322-328.
10. Crowley K.E., Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:732-744.
11. Dien J. The ERP PCA Toolkit: an open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 187:138.
12. Dien J. Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: a tutorial. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2012, 37:497-517.
13. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:357-374.
14. Donchin E., Ritter W., McCallum W.D. Cognitive psychophysiology: the endogenous components of the ERP. Event-Related Brain Potentials in Man 1978, 349-411. Academic Press, New York. E. Callaway, P. Tueting, S.H. Koslow (Eds.).
15. Donchin E., Heffley E., Hillyard S.A., Loveless N., Maltzman I., Öhman A., Rösler R., Ruchkin D., Siddle D. Cognition and event-related potentials: II. The orienting reflex and P300. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1984, 425:39-57.
16. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977, 14:456-467.
17. Fitzgerald P.G., Picton T.W. Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. Can. J. Psychol. 1981, 35:188-200.
18. Gonsalvez C.J., Polich J. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:388-396.
19. Gonsalvez C.J., Gordon E., Grayson S., Barry R.J., Lazzaro I., Bahramali H. Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude?. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:643-654.
20. Gonsalvez C.J., Barry R.J., Rushby J.A., Polich J. Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:245-250.
21. Hermanutz M., Cohen R., Sommer W. The effects of serial order in long sequences of auditory stimuli on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:415-423.
22. Howell D. Statistical Methods for Psychology 1997, Thompson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 6th ed.
23. Johnson R., Donchin E. P300 and stimulus categorization: Two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology 1980, 17:167-178.
24. Johnson R., Donchin E. Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach. Psychophysiology 1982, 19:183-200.
25. Kayser J., Tenke C.E. Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:2307-2325.
26. Kenemans J.L., Melis C.J., Verbaten M.N., Slangen J.L. Visual ERPs to a single deviant stimulus sensitive to the number of preceding standard stimuli. J. Psychophysiol. 1991, 5:349-359.
27. Leuthold H., Sommer W. Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:510-517.
28. Miltner W., Johnson R., Braun C. Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials. J. Psychophysiol. 1991, 5:27-42.
29. Näätänen R. Implications of ERP data for psychological theories of attention. Biol. Psychol. 1988, 26:117-163.
30. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav. Brain Sci. 1990, 13:201-288.
31. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., Mäntysalo S. Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. 1978, 42:313-329.
32. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
33. Nieuwenhuis S., Aston-Jones G., Cohen J. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131:510-532.
34. O'Brien R.G., Kaiser M.K. MANOVA method for analysing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97:316-333.
35. Polich J. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 1990, 27:396-403.
36. Polich J. Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1990, 10:163-170.
37. Polich J., Bondurant T. P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval. Physiol. Behav. 1997, 61:843-849.
38. Polich J., Brock T., Geisler M.W. P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1991, 11:219-223.
39. Ritter W., Vaughan J.H.G., Costa L.D. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1968, 25:550-556.
40. Sams M., Alho K., Näätänen R. Sequential effects on the ERP in discriminating two stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 1983, 17:41-58.
41. Sams M., Alho K., Näätänen R. Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 1984, 21:434-441.
42. Sawaki R., Katayama J. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:2532-2539.
43. Sommer W., Leuthold H., Matt J. The expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and unconscious. Behav. Brain Sci. 1998, 21:149-168.
44. Squires K.C., Wickens C., Squires N.K., Donchin E. The effects of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event related potential. Science 1976, 193:1142-1146.
45. Squires K.C., Petuchowski S., Wickens C., Donchin E. The effects of stimulus sequence on ERPs: a comparison of visual and auditory sequences. Percept. Psychophys. 1977, 22:31-40.
46. Starr A., Aguinaldo T., Roe M., Michalewski H.J. Sequential changes of auditory processing during target detection: motor responding versus mental counting. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 105:201-212.
47. Steiner G.Z., Barry R.J., Gonsalvez C.J. Can working memory predict target-to-target interval effects on the P3?. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2013, 89:399-408.
48. Steiner G.Z., Brennan M.L., Gonsalvez C.J., Barry R.J. Comparing P300 modulations: target-to-target interval versus infrequent nontarget-to-nontarget interval in a three-stimulus task. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:187-194.
49. Steiner G.Z., Barry R.J., Gonsalvez C.J. Nontarget-to-nontarget interval determines the nontarget P300 in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2014, 92:113-121.
50. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 1989, Harper Collins, New York.
51. Teder W., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:71-81.
52. Thomas S.J., Gonsalvez C.J., Johnstone S.J. Sequence Effects in the Go/NoGo Task: Inhibition and Facilitation 2009, 74:209-219.
53. Thomaschke R., Kiesel A., Hoffmann J. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2011, 73:2309-2322.
54. Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1970, 28:360-367.
55. Verleger R. Sequential effects on P3 in a counting task: a partial replication. Biol. Psychol. 1987, 25:221-246.
56. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context-updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:343-356.
57. Verleger R. The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 78:240-251.
58. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:131-156.
59. Verleger Towards an integration of P3 research with cognitive neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 1998, 21:150-152.
60. Wagner A.R. SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms 1981, 5-47. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. N.E. Spear, R.R. Miller (Eds.).
61. Woods D.L., Courchesne E. The recovery functions of auditory event-related potentials during split-second discriminations. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 65:304-315.
62. Woods D.L., Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Recovery cycles of event-related potentials in multiple detection tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1980, 50:335-347.