Nontarget-to-nontarget interval determines the nontarget P300 in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 113-121

  Steiner, Genevieve Z ^a   Barry, Robert J ^a   Gonsalvez, Craig J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Event related potentials (ERPs); Interstimulus interval (ISI); Late positive complex (LPC); LORETA; Nontarget to nontarget interval (NNI); P300; P3b; Sequence effects; Slow wave (SW); Target to target interval (TTI)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY EQUIPROBABLE GO NO GO TASK; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONTARGET TO NONTARGET INTERVAL; NORMAL HUMAN; SLOW BRAIN WAVE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TARGET TO TARGET INTERVAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898679407     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Azizian A., Freitas A.L., Watson T.D., Squires N.K. Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity. Biol. Psychol. 2006, 71:278-288.
2. Barry R.J., De Blasio F.M. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2013, 89:123-127.
3. Barry R.J., Rushby J.A. An orienting reflex perspective on anteriorisation of the P3 of the event-related potential. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 173:539-545.
4. Bokura H., Yamaguchi S., Kobayashi S. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:2224-2232.
5. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 39:131-143.
6. Croft R.J., Barry R.J. Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 30:5-19.
7. Croft R.J., Gonsalvez C.J., Gabriel C., Barry R.J. Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:322-328.
8. Dien J. The ERP PCA Toolkit: an open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 187:138.
9. Dien J. Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: a tutorial. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2012, 37:497-517.
10. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:357-374.
11. Donchin E., McCarthy G., Kutas M., Ritter W. Event-related brain potentials in the study of consciousness. Consciousness and Self-regulation 1983, vol. 3:81-121. Plenum, New York. R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz, D. Shapiro (Eds.).
12. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977, 14:456-467.
13. Fitzgerald P.G., Picton T.W. Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. Can. J. Psychol. 1981, 35:188-200.
14. Gonsalvez C.J., Polich J. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:388-396.
15. Gonsalvez C.J., Gordon E., Grayson S., Barry R.J., Lazzaro I., Bahramali H. Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude?. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:643-654.
16. Gonsalvez C.J., Barry R.J., Rushby J.A., Polich J. Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:245-250.
17. Hermanutz M., Cohen R., Sommer W. The effects of serial order in long sequences of auditory stimuli on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:415-423.
18. Howell D. Statistical Methods for Psychology 1997, Thompson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 6th ed.
19. Jentzsch I., Sommer W. Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: topographic analyses and dipole source localization. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:607-621.
20. Johnson R., Donchin E. P300 and stimulus categorization: two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology 1980, 17:167-178.
21. Johnson R., Donchin E. Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach. Psychophysiology 1982, 19:183-200.
22. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Variants of uncertainty. Cognition 1982, 11:143-157.
23. Karis D., Chesney G.L., Donchin E. "... 'twas ten to o≠ and yet we ventured...": P300 and decision making. Psychophysiology 1983, 20:260-268.
24. Kayser J., Tenke C.E. Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:2307-2325.
25. Leuthold H., Sommer W. Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:510-517.
26. Matt J., Leuthold H., Sommer W. Differential effects of voluntary expectancies on reaction times and event-related potentials: evidence for automatic and controlled expectancies. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992, 18:810-822.
27. Miltner W., Johnson R., Braun C. Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials. J. Psychophysiol. 1991, 5:27-42.
28. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
29. Nieuwenhuis S., Forstmann B.U., Wagenmakers E. Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1105-1107.
30. O'Brien R.G., Kaiser M.K. MANOVA method for analysing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97:316-333.
31. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem. Int. J. Bioelectromag. 1999, 1:75-86.
32. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994, 18:49-65.
33. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Weller B.J., Kopell B.S. ERPs to response production and inhibition. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 60:423-434.
34. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 9:456-479.
35. Polich J. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 1990, 27:396-403.
36. Polich J. Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1990, 10:163-170.
37. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
38. Polich J., Bondurant T. P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval. Physiol. Behav. 1997, 61:843-849.
39. Polich J., Brock T., Geisler M.W. P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1991, 11:219-223.
40. Pritchard W.S. Psychophysiology of P300. Psychol. Bull. 1981, 89:506-540.
41. Ritter W., Vaughan J.H.G., Costa L.D. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1968, 25:550-556.
42. Saletu M., Anderer P., Saletu-Zyhlarz G.M., Mandl M., Zeitlhofer J., Saletu B. Event-related potential low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (ERP-LORETA) suggests decreased energetic resources for cognitive processing in narcolepsy. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:1782-1794.
43. Sams M., Alho K., Näätänen R. Sequential effects on the ERP in discriminating two stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 1983, 17:41-58.
44. Sams M., Alho K., Näätänen R. Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 1984, 21:434-441.
45. Sawaki R., Katayama J. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:2532-2539.
46. Sommer W., Matt J., Leuthold H. Consciousness of attention and expectancy as reflected in event-related potentials and reaction times. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1990, 16:902-915.
47. Sommer W., Leuthold H., Matt J. The expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and unconscious. Behav. Brain Sci. 1998, 21:149-168.
48. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 38:387-401.
49. Squires K.C., Wickens C., Squires N.K., Donchin E. The effects of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event related potential. Science 1976, 193:1142-1146.
50. Squires K.C., Petuchowski S., Wickens C., Donchin E. The effects of stimulus sequence on ERPs: a comparison of visual and auditory sequences. Percept. Psychophys. 1977, 22:31-40.
51. Starr A., Aguinaldo T., Roe M., Michalewski H.J. Sequential changes of auditory processing during target detection: motor responding versus mental counting. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 105:201-212.
52. Steiner G.Z., Barry R.J., Gonsalvez C.J. Can working memory predict target-to-target interval effects on the P3?. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2013, 89:399-408.
53. Steiner G.Z., Brennan M.L., Gonsalvez C.J., Barry R.J. Comparing P300 modulations: target-to-target interval versus infrequent nontarget-to-nontarget interval in a three-stimulus task. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:187-194.
54. Stevens M.C., Calhoun V.D., Kiehl K.A. fMRI in an oddball task: effects of target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:636-642.
55. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
56. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 1989, Harper Collins, New York.
57. Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1970, 28:360-367.
58. Verleger R. Sequential effects on P3 in a counting task: a partial replication. Biol. Psychol. 1987, 25:221-246.
59. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context-updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:343-356.
60. Verleger R. The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 78:240-251.
61. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:131-156.
62. Verleger R., Möcks J. Varimax may produce slow-wave-like shapes by merging monotonic trends with other components. J. Psychophysiol. 1987, 1:265-270.
63. Verleger R., Jaśkowski P., Wascher E. Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J. Psychophysiol. 2005, 19:165-181.
64. Volpe U., Mucci A., Bucci P., Merlotti E., Galderisi S., Maj M. The cortical generators of P3a and P3b: a LORETA study. Brain Res. Bull. 2007, 73:220-230.
65. Watson T.D., Azizian A., Berry S., Squires N.K. Event-related potentials as an index of similarity between words and pictures. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:361-368.