Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks

Psychophysiology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 322-328

  Croft, Rodney J ^a,b   Gonsalvez, C J ^b   Gabriel, C ^b   Barry, R J ^b  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Endogenous; ISI; P3; P300; Probability; Target to target interval; TTI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEMORY; NERVE CONDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STIMULUS;

EID: 0037904761     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00036     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., Chou, C. L., & Aunon, J. I. (1983). P3 and stimulus incentive value. Psychophysiology, 20, 95-101.
2. Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, N., & Zerlin, S. (1966). The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery processes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 21, 105-113.
3. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513.
4. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 componenet a manifestation of context-updating? Behaviorial and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
5. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467.
6. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1984). The P300 event-related potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology, 14, 1-52.
7. Fitzgerald, P. G., & Picton, T. W. (1981). Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 188-200.
8. Gonsalvez, C. J., Gordon, E., Anderson, J., Pettigrew, G., Barry, R. J., Rennie, C., & Meares, R. (1995). Numbers of preceding nontargets differentially affect responses to targets in normal volunteers and patients with schizophrenia: A study of event-related potentials. Psychiatry Research, 58, 69-75.
9. Gonsalvez, C. J., Gordon, E., Grayson, S., Barry, R. J., Lazzaro, I., & Bahramali, H. (1999). Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? Psychophysiology, 36, 643-654.
10. Gonsalvez, C. J., & Polich, J. (2002). P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology, 39, 388-396.
11. Johnson, R. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potentials: Review and synthesis. In P. Ackles, J R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.) Advances in psychophysiology: A research annual (vol. 3, pp. 69-137). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
12. Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.
13. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1998). P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 33-40.
14. Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1988). Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-track and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biological Psychology, 26, 231-267.
15. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulaus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
16. Miltner, W., Johnson, R., & Braun, C. (1991). Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: II. Effects of inter-stimulus interval. Journal of Psychophysiology, 5, 27-42.
17. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479.
18. Polich, J. (1987). Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 68, 311-320.
19. Polich, J. (1990a). P300, probability, and inter-stimulus interval. Psychophysiology, 27, 396-403.
20. Polich, J. (1990b). Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 163-170.
21. Polich, J. (1996). Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology, 33, 334-353.
22. Polich, J., Aung, M., & Dalessio, D. J. (1988). Long latency auditory evoked potentials: Intensity, interstimulus interval, and habituation. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 23, 35-40.
23. Polich, J., & Bondurant, T. (1997). P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval. Physiology and Behavior, 61, 843-849.
24. Polich, J., Brock, T., & Geisler, M. W. (1991). P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: Probability and inter stimulus interval. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 219-223.
25. Polich, J., Eischen, S. E., & Collins, G. E. (1994). P300 from a single auditory stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 253-261.
26. Polich, J., Ellerson, P. C., & Cohen, J. (1996). P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 55-62.
27. Polich, J., & Heine, M. R. D. (1996). P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm. Psychophysiology, 33, 747-752.
28. Polich, J., & Margala, C. (1997). P300 and probability: Comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 169-176.
29. Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506-540.
30. Roth, W. T., Krainz, P. L., Ford, J. M., Tinklenberg, J. R., Rothbart, R. M., & Kopell, B. S. (1976). Parameters of temporal recovery of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 40, 623-632.
31. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.
32. Squires, K., Petuchowski, S., Wickens, C., & Donchin, E. (1977). The effects of stimulus sequence on event-related potentials: A comparison of visual and auditory sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 31-40.
33. Squires, K., Wickens, C., Squires, N., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146.
34. Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 343-327.
35. Wickens, C., Kramer, A., Vanasse, L., & Donchin, E. (1983). The performance of concurrent tasks: A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources. Science, 221, 1080-1082.
36. Wilson, G. F., Swain, C. R., & Ullsperger, P. (1998). ERP components elicited in response to warning stimuli: The influence of task difficulty. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 137-158.