Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: Inhibition and facilitation

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 209-219

  Thomas, Susan Jennifer ^a   Gonsalvez, Craig Joseph ^a   Johnstone, Stuart John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Facilitation; Go NoGo; Inhibition; Priming; Sequence effects

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 70449521097     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Bannon S., Gonsalvez C.J., Croft R.J., and Boyce P.M. Response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research 110 (2002) 165-174
2. Bannon S., Gonsalvez C.J., and Croft R.J. Processing impairments in OCD: it is more than inhibition!. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46 (2008) 689-700
3. Broyd S.J., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J., Clarke A.R., McCarthy R., Selikowitz M., and Lawrence C.A. The effect of methylphenidate on response inhibition and the event-related potential of children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology 58 (2005) 47-58
4. Bruin K.J., and Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology 113 (2002) 1172-1182
5. Buckner R.L., Goodman J., Burock M., Rotte M., Koutstaal W., Schacter D., Rosen B., and Dale A.M. Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. Neuron 20 (1998) 285-296
6. Callaway E., and Halliday R. The effect of attentional effort on visual evoked potential N1 latency. Psychiatry Research 7 (1982) 299-308
7. Derogatis L.R., and Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine 13 (1983) 595-605
8. Dimoska A., and Johnstone S.J. Neural mechanisms underlying trait impulsivity in non-clinical adults: stop-signal performance and event-related potentials. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 31 (2007) 443-454
9. Dimoska A., and Johnstone S.J. Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?. Biological Psychology 77 (2008) 324-336
10. Dimoska A., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J., and Clarke A.R. Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychiatry 54 (2003) 1345-1354
11. Donkers F.C.L., and van Boxtel G.J.M. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 165-176
12. Durston S., Thomas K.M., Worden M.S., Yang Y., and Casey B.J. The effect of preceding context on inhibition: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 16 (2002) 449-453
13. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychology 35 (1993) 123-138
14. Eimer M. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica 101 (1999) 293-313
15. Eimer M., and Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology 64 (2003) 7-26
16. Falkenstein M. Inhibition, conflict and the Nogo-N2. Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (2006) 1638-1640
17. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica 101 (1999) 267-291
18. Fallgatter A.J., and Strik W.K. The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control. International Journal of Psychophysiology 32 (1999) 233-238
19. Friedman D., and Cycowicz Y.M. Repetition priming of possible and impossible objects from ERP and behavioral perspectives. Psychophysiology 43 (2006) 569-578
20. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Murphy K., Roche R.A.P., and Stein E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 1820-1829
21. Ghatan P.H., Hsieh J.C., Petersson K.M., Stone-Elander S., and Ingvar M. Coexistence of attention-based facilitation and inhibition in the human cortex. NeuroImage 7 (1998) 23-29
22. Gonsalvez C.J., and Polich J. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 388-396
23. Gonsalvez C.J., Gordon E., Anderson J., Pettigrew G., Barry R.J., Rennie C., and Meares R. Numbers of preceding nontargets differentially affect responses to targets in normal volunteers and patients with schizophrenia: a study of event-related potentials. Psychiatry Research 58 (1995) 69-75
24. Gonsalvez C.J., Gordon E., Grayson S., Barry R.J., Lazzaro I., and Bahramali H. Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 643-654
25. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., and Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 14-23
26. Guo C., Lawson A.L., and Jiang Y. Distinct neural mechanisms for repetition effects of visual objects. Neuroscience 149 (2007) 747-759
27. Hartston H.J., and Swerdlow N.R. Visuospatial priming and Stroop performance in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Neuropsychology 13 (1999) 447-457
28. Henson R.N.A., and Rugg M.D. Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 263-270
29. Henson R.N., Rylands A., Ross E., Vuilleumeir P., and Rugg M.D. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. NeuroImage 21 (2004) 1674-1689
30. Jasper H.H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 20 (1958) 371-375
31. Jodo E., and Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 82 (1992) 477-482
32. Johnson R.J. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 30 (1993) 90-97
33. Johnson R.J., and Donchin E. P300 and stimulus categorization: two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology 17 (1980) 167-178
34. Johnstone S.J., and Clarke A.R. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/Nogo task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research 166 (2009) 223-237
35. Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J., and Clarke A.R. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology 66 (2007) 37-47
36. Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J., Markovska V., Dimoska A., and Clarke A.R. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 72 (2009) 145-153
37. Johnstone, S.J., Barry, R.J., Markovska, V., Dimoska, A. & Clarke, A.R. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: A visual ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, In Press, Corrected Proof.
38. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-147
39. Koester D., and Prinz W. Capturing regularities in event sequences: evidence for two mechanisms. Brain Research 1180 (2007) 59-77
40. Kok A. Varieties of inhibition: manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica 101 (1999) 129-158
41. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., and Rist F. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 99 (1996) 19-27
42. Kutas M., McCarthy G., and Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197 (1977) 792-795
43. Leboe J.P., Whittlesea B.W.A., and Milliken B. Selective and nonselective transfer: positive and negative priming in a multiple-task environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology / Learning, Memory & Cognition 31 (2005) 1001-1029
44. Lobaugh N.J., Chevalier H., Batty M., and Taylor M.J. Accelerated and amplified neural responses in visual discrimination: two features are processed faster than one. NeuroImage 26 (2005) 986-995
45. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 62 (1985) 203-208
46. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., and Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/nogo task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 3 (2003) 17-26
47. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard R., Johnson R.J., Miller G.A., Ritter W., Ruchkin M.D., Rugg M.D., and Taylor M.J. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology (2000)
48. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 118 (2007) 2128-2148
49. Posner M.I., and Snyder C.R. Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In: Rabbitt P.M.A., and Dornic S. (Eds). Attention and Performance (1975), London, Academic Press
50. Potts G.F. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 5-13
51. Ratcliff R. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993) 510-532
52. Roberts L.E., Rau H., Lutzenberger W., and Birbaumer N. Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No--Go discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section 92 (1994) 44-55
53. Roche R.A.P., Garavan H., Foxe J.J., and O'Mara S.M. Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition. Experimental Brain Research 160 (2005) 60-70
54. Rugg M.D., Pearl S., Walker P., Roberts R.C., and Holdstock J.S. Word repetition effects on event-related potentials in healthy young and old subjects, and in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 381-398
55. Salisbury D.F., Griggs C.B., Shenton M.E., and McCarley R.W. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization'effect and response inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology 115 (2004) 1550-1558
56. Sams M., Alho K., and Näätänen R. Sequential effects on the ERP in discriminating two stimuli. Biological Psychology 17 (1983) 41-58
57. Schuller A.M., and Rossion B. Perception of static eye gaze direction facilitates subsequent early visual processing. Clinical Neurophysiology 115 (2004) 1161-1168
58. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., and Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 695
59. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology 115 (2004) 1320-1331
60. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology 61 (2006) 121-133
61. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology 119 (2008) 704-714
62. Soetens E. Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 547-568
63. Soetens E., Deboeck M., and Hueting J. Automatic after effects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 581-598
64. Squires K.C., Wickens C., Squires N.K., and Donchin E. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science 193 (1976) 1142-1146
65. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics (1989), Harper Collins, New York
66. Taylor M.J. Non-spatial attentional effects on P1. Clinical Neurophysiology 113 (2002) 1903-1908
67. Thomas S.J., Johnstone S.J., and Gonsalvez C.J. Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology 63 (2007) 221-231
68. Verleger R. Sequential effects on P3 in a counting task: a partial replication. Biological Psychology 25 (1987) 221-246
69. Verleger R., Paehge T., Kolev V., Yordanova J., and Jaskowski P. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Biological Psychology 73 (2006) 298-313
70. Vervaeck K.R., and Boer L.C. Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: subjective expectancy and automatic after-effect at short response-stimulus intervals. Acta Psychologica 44 (1980) 175-190
71. Watson T.D., Azizian A., Berry S., and Squires N.K. Event-related potentials as an index of similarity between words and pictures. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 361-368
72. Wright C.I., Keuthen N.J., Savage C.R., Martis B., Williams D., Wedig M., McMullin K., and Rauch S.L. Brain correlates of negative and positive visuospatial priming in adults. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 983-991