The quantification of low-probability-high-consequences events: Part I. A generic multi-risk approach

Natural Hazards

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1999-2022

  Mignan, Arnaud ^a   Wiemer, Stefan ^a   Giardini, Domenico ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Extreme event; Markov chain; Monte Carlo; Multi hazard; Multi risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905682012     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1178-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adachi T, Ellingwood BR (2008) Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: effects of electrical power availability and power backups systems on system vulnerability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93: 78-88. doi: 10. 1016/j. ress. 2006. 10. 014.
2. Barker K, Haimes YY (2009) Assessing uncertainty in extreme events: applications to risk-based decision making in interdependent infrastructure sectors. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94: 819-829. doi: 10. 1016/j. ress. 2008. 09. 008.
3. Bier VM, Haimes YV, Lambert JH, Matalas NC, Zimmerman R (1999) A survey of approaches for assessing and managing the risk of extremes. Risk Anal 19: 83-94.
4. Bilham R (2009) The seismic future of cities. Bull Earthq Eng. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-009-9147-0.
5. Brown P, Spalding RE, ReVelle DO, Tagliaferri E, Worden SP (2002) The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth. Nature 420: 294-296.
6. Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2010) Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464: 1025-1028. doi: 10. 1038/nature08932.
7. Carpignano A, Golia E, Di Mauro C, Bouchon S, Nordvik J-R (2009) A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: first application. J Risk Res 12: 513-534. doi: 10. 1080/13669870903050269.
8. Cornell C (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 59: 1583-1606.
9. Cox T (1998) Risk integration and decision-making. In: Kirchssteiger C, Christou MD, Papadakis GA (eds) Risk assessment and management in the context of the Seveso II Directive. Industrial Safety Series, 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
10. Eggert S, Walter TR (2009) Volcanic activity before and after large tectonic earthquakes: observations and statistical significance. Tectonophysics 471: 14-26. doi: 10. 1016/j. tecto. 2008. 10. 003.
11. Fabbrocino G, Iervolino I, Orlando F, Salzano E (2005) Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. J Hazardous Mater A123: 61-69. doi: 10. 1016/j. jhazmat. 2005. 04. 015.
12. Garcin M, Desprats JF, Fontaine M, Pedreros R, Attanayake N, Fernando S, Siriwardana CHER, De Silva U, Poisson B (2008) Integrated approach for coastal hazards and risks in Sri Lanka. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8: 577-586.
13. Gill JC, Malamud BD (2012) Reviewing and visualising interaction relationships for natural hazards, EGU General Assembly 2012, 22-27 April, 2012, Vienna, Austria, 708.
14. Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds) (2005) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, Berlin.
15. Grossi P, Kunreuther H, Windeler D (2005) Chapter 2-an introduction to catastrophe models and insurance. In: Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, Berlin, pp 23-42.
16. Grünthal G, Thieken AH, Scharz J, Radtke KS, Smolka A, Merz B (2006) Comparative risk assessments for the city of cologne-storms, floods, earthquakes. Nat Hazards 38: 21-44. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-005-8598-0.
17. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34: 185-188.
18. Hill DP, Pollitz F, Newhall C (2002) Earthquake-volcano interactions. Phys Today 55(11): 41-47.
19. Irish JL, Resio DT, Ratcliff JJ (2008) The influence of storm size on hurricane surge. J Phys Oceanogr 38: 2003-2013. doi: 10. 1175/2008JPO3727. 1.
20. Jalayer F, Asprone D, Prota A, Manfredi G (2010) A decision support system for post-earthquake reliability asessment of structures subjected to aftershocks: an application to L'Aquila earthquake, 2009. Bull Earthq Eng. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-010-9230-6.
21. Kameda H (2012), Engineering agenda on nuclear safety from the 2011 Tohoku-Pacific earthquake. In: Proceedings of international symposium engineering lessons learned from the 2011 great East Japan Earthquake, March 1-4, 2012, Tokyo, Japan, 102-121.
22. Kappes MS, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64: 1925-1958. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-012-0294-2.
23. King GCP (2007) Fault interaction, earthquake stress changes, and the evolution of seismicity. In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 4. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 225-256.
24. Komendantova N, Mrzyglocki R, Mignan A, Khazai B, Wenzel F, Patt A, Fleming K (2014) Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: Feedback from civil protection stakeholders. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8: 50-67. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijdrr. 2013. 12. 006.
25. Krausmann E, Cozzani V, Salzano E, Renni E (2011) Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11: 921-929. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-11-921-2011.
26. Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 415-443. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-006-9024-z.
27. Mailier PJ, Stephenson DB, Ferro CAT, Hodges KI (2006) Serial clustering of extratropical cyclones. Mon Weather Rev 134: 2224-2240.
28. Marzocchi W, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Gasparini P, Mastellone ML, Di Ruocco A (2012), Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy. Nat Hazards. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-012-0092-x.
29. Mignan A, Grossi P, Muir-Wood R (2011) Risk assessment of Tunguska-type airbursts. Nat Hazards 56: 869-880. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-010-9597-3.
30. Parsons T (2005), Significance of stress transfer in time-dependent earthquake probability calculations. J Geophys Res 110: B05S02. doi: 10. 1029/2004JB003190.
31. Paté-Cornell E (2012) On "Black Swans" and "Perfect Storms": risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough. Risk Anal 32: 1823-1833. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1539-6924. 2011. 01787. x.
32. Piccardi L, Masse WB (eds) (2007) Myth and geology. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 273.
33. Rao AS, Lepech MD, Kiremidjian AS, Sun XY (2010) Time varying risk modeling of deteriorating bridge infrastructure for sustainable infrastructure design, 5th international conference on bridge maintenance safety management and life cycle optimization. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2494-2501.
34. Reese S, Ramsay D (2010) RiskScape: flood fragility methodology. NIWA Technical Report: WLG2010-45, p 46.
35. Scheffers A, Scheffers S, Squire P (2012) Trimlines as evidence for palaeo-tsunamis. Nat Hazards 63: 165-179. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-010-9691-6.
36. Schmidt J, Matcham I, Reese S, King A, Bell R, Henderson R, Smart G, Cousins J, Smith W, Heron D (2011) Quantitative multi-risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling. Nat Hazards 58: 1169-1192. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-011-9721-z.
37. Selva J (2013) Long-term multi-risk assessment: statistical treatment of interaction among risks. Hazards, Nat. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-013-0599-9.
38. Simkin T, Siebert L (1994) Volcanoes of the world, 2nd edn. Geoscience Press, Tucson.
39. Smolka A (2006) Natural disasters and the challenge of extreme events: risk management from an insurance perspective. Philos Trans R Soc A 364: 2147-2165. doi: 10. 1098/rsta. 2006. 1818.
40. Sornette D, Ouillon G (2012) Dragon-kings: mechanisms, statistical methods and empirical evidence. Eur Phys J Spec Top 205: 1-26. doi: 10. 1140/epjst/e2012-01559-5.
41. Spence RJS, Kelman I, Zuccaro PJ, Petrazzuoli S (2005) Residential building and occupant vulnerability to tephra fall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5: 477-494. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-5-477-2005.
42. Srivihok P, Honda K, Ruangrassamee A, Muangsin V, Naparat P, Foytong P, Promdumrong N, Aphimaeteethomrong P, Intavee A, Layug JE, Kosin T (2012) Development of an online tool for tsunami inundation simulation and tsunami loss estimation. Cont Shelf Res. doi: 10. 1016/j. csr. 2012. 08. 021.
43. Suppasri A, Imamura F, Koshimura S (2012) Tsunamigenic ratio of the Pacific Ocean earthquakes and a proposal for a Tsunami Index. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12: 175-185. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-12-175-2012.
44. Taleb NN (2007) The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House, New York.
45. Toda S, Stein RS, Reasenberg PA, Dieterich JH, Yoshida A (1998) Stress transferred by the 1995 Mw = 6. 9 Kobe, Japan, shock: effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J Geophys Res 103(B10): 24543-24565.
46. Vitolo R, Stephenson DB, Cook IM, Mitchell-Wallace K (2009) Serial clustering of intense European storms. Meteorol Zeitschrift 18: 411-424.
47. Wehner M, Ginger J, Holmes J, Sandland C, Edwards M (2010) Development of methods for assessing the vulnerability of Australian residential building stock to severe wind, IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 11, doi: 10. 1088/1755-1315/11/1/012017.
48. Zuccaro G, Cacace F, Spence RJS, Baxter PJ (2008) Impact of explosive eruption scenarios at Vesuvius. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178: 416-453. doi: 10. 1016/j. jvolgeores. 2008. 01. 005.